Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,836 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,432,964
Pageviews Today: 1,954,452Threads Today: 462Posts Today: 9,396
02:10 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1524722
United States
12/26/2012 06:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman



To not question the official story is the ultimate disrespect to the victims as it allows their murderers and the co-conspirators to get away free and probably kill again. WAKE UP, you're sleep walking again.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1524722


and you are plain lying.

you think anyone considers for one minute you believe what you are claiming?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30912042



You obviously don't even know what the fuck I am claiming. I can see that we're winning and waking people up on this topic because all the stinking pieces of shit shills like you come festering up out of your black ops sewers.

THIS IS WHAT I CLAIM: That there are professional hit teams in the US assembled, funded and managed by black ops agencies, who go around this country in groups of 2-3 agents and who arrange these mass shootings and then frame some poor patsy as the killer. These are PROFESSIONAL DEATH SQUADS as have been used in many other countries and times, and I believe they are involved in shootings like Sandy Hook, Aurora, Sikh Temple and others I'm sure.

I find that far more believable than some 110 lb autistic kid took all these guns and rifles and body armor...from his MOTHER...whom he killed and then went and stormed some school neither he nor she had any connection with despite the never ending onslaught of LEO and MSM LIES - repeated LIES.

And YOU are a lying sack of shit and someday you'll come down with the rest of these evil fucks who do this to children. FUCK YOU ASSHOLE.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5588896
Canada
12/26/2012 06:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman

Being a truth seeker, I would hope people would be searching for the truth on my children's behalf. That's what they said about the 911 families, and a lot of them came out searching for truth. A*S is a controlled site, end of story.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11360402
United States
12/26/2012 06:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
...


So You can't Find the "Offical Story" either??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


Typical snide and sarcastic shill response to a perfectly reasonable explanation of the way things work.

Such responses play to their only audience. Those like themselves, or naive lazy casual forum readers. The lowest common denominator.

I actually have quite a bit of pity for such people who have such a delusional sense of self due to various mental/emotional traumas and upbringing, coupled with brain numbing diets. Sad. But they still must be revealed and identified for the sad subhumans they have become.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


So I'm Typical,snide and sarcastic,a Shill.

I'm naive and lazy,a casual forum reader.

You Pitty me,I'm delusional,I have mental/emotional traumas
and a brain Numbing Diet, and I'm a sad subhuman...

Damn!!yeahsure

If You and your friends are going to Claim that there are inconsistencies in the Offical Story,Why Can't Any of you Just Post the "Offical Story"

You've spent Day's putting the "Evidence" together,What's The Problem??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


The Hartford Courant is the OLDEST newspaper in the U.S. I consider what they publish to be the "official story." AND IT IS FULL OF HOLES!!!
Thread: SANDY HOOK - Ms. Soto's Class - Details Change AGAIN!!

Address the points I raise, if you dare.
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


No I won't take that dare,You've posted way too much information.

D
GladioDaddy-O

User ID: 22439147
United States
12/26/2012 07:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
...


Typical snide and sarcastic shill response to a perfectly reasonable explanation of the way things work.

Such responses play to their only audience. Those like themselves, or naive lazy casual forum readers. The lowest common denominator.

I actually have quite a bit of pity for such people who have such a delusional sense of self due to various mental/emotional traumas and upbringing, coupled with brain numbing diets. Sad. But they still must be revealed and identified for the sad subhumans they have become.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


So I'm Typical,snide and sarcastic,a Shill.

I'm naive and lazy,a casual forum reader.

You Pitty me,I'm delusional,I have mental/emotional traumas
and a brain Numbing Diet, and I'm a sad subhuman...

Damn!!yeahsure

If You and your friends are going to Claim that there are inconsistencies in the Offical Story,Why Can't Any of you Just Post the "Offical Story"

You've spent Day's putting the "Evidence" together,What's The Problem??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


The Hartford Courant is the OLDEST newspaper in the U.S. I consider what they publish to be the "official story." AND IT IS FULL OF HOLES!!!
Thread: SANDY HOOK - Ms. Soto's Class - Details Change AGAIN!!

Address the points I raise, if you dare.
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


No I won't take that dare,You've posted way too much information.

D
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


That's idiotic.
s.j
User ID: 30889932
United States
12/26/2012 07:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


bla bla blah

homo
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30662905
United States
12/26/2012 07:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
...


You are the type of person who points out a person's spelling mistakes in order to attempt to smear them in a negative light and hope to discredit them that way.

Either that or you are extremely naive and uninformed about the state of mass media in this country.

See, I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

So, here is the deal.

Any mass media publication is owned by one of a handful of parent companies, who have placed loyal editor's in chief who are bound by ideology and private contract to frame a narrative via the "journalism" they publish.

This includes almost all print newspapers to a one, major magazines, and their online satellites.

So all together, whatever they report, is the "official" story. A person who is paying attention will note that they all say the same thing, and if not, then eventually, over time, they will get on the same page with their final conclusive coverage on any major event.

Wake up. Gladio has.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


So You can't Find the "Offical Story" either??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


Typical snide and sarcastic shill response to a perfectly reasonable explanation of the way things work.

Such responses play to their only audience. Those like themselves, or naive lazy casual forum readers. The lowest common denominator.

I actually have quite a bit of pity for such people who have such a delusional sense of self due to various mental/emotional traumas and upbringing, coupled with brain numbing diets. Sad. But they still must be revealed and identified for the sad subhumans they have become.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


So I'm Typical,snide and sarcastic,a Shill.

I'm naive and lazy,a casual forum reader.

You Pitty me,I'm delusional,I have mental/emotional traumas
and a brain Numbing Diet, and I'm a sad subhuman...

Damn!!yeahsure

If You and your friends are going to Claim that there are inconsistencies in the Offical Story,Why Can't Any of you Just Post the "Offical Story"

You've spent Day's putting the "Evidence" together,What's The Problem??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


The only problem around here are shills who don't do their own homework and have their feet so far shoved into their mouths they are shitting toes.

Many GLP'ers have recorded most if not all of the inconsistencies and discrepancies published by the mainstream controlled media sources. You know the one's who claim all their sources are "official".

Sonic Dreamer started that thread and put the words "Newtown" and "MAJOR DISCREPANCIES LIST" in the title to make it easy to find in a search.

Over 30 pages of inconsistencies from the mouth's of "officials". Updated hourly, daily.

Anyone really interested in the collective "official" story can find it right there.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27936953
United States
12/26/2012 07:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
To deny speculation,denies truth
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30541819
United States
12/26/2012 07:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
The official story is a damn lie!

Alleged 'shooter' Adam with no drivers license or car of his own unable to even support himself due to developmental disabilities pulled off this all? Dont think so.

Other massacres have many inconsistencies. This looks the same.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 07:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Kidnap Sandy Claws.


[link to www.youtube.com]
HERE'S THE REASON WHY THE
User ID: 1908267
United States
12/26/2012 07:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
DID IT

BECAUSE THIS SHOOTING
THIS PARTICULAR SHOOTING THEY INTEND ON USING
THEY R GONNA ACT ON ITS INTEL
THIS IS THE ONE THEY POINT TO TO TURN ON THE GUNS
THEY NEED THIS ONE IT IS IN THE SCRIPT
SO
WE REALLY NEED TO TAKE IT DOWN
LIKE A SMALL 911TRUTH GROUP
MEET IN SECRET LIKE ANONYMOUS AND
TAKE JUST 'THIS ONE' APART
PIECE BY PIECE
BLAKBLOK STYLE
NOW GO
-
User ID: 30541819
United States
12/26/2012 07:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
THE PETE SANTILLI SHOW has been covering it all...

[link to www.americanfreedomradio.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 07:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
PedoBear.


[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Cowherder
FEMA Region IX.

User ID: 28230270
United States
12/26/2012 07:53 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
AG Eric Holder stated in 1995 the Americans had to be brainwashed into accepting new gun controls.

Cass Sunstein said that conspiracy theorists must be met head-on by government to reinforce the government's truth.

the US Air Force commissioned software to enable one user to manage hundreds of on-line profiles to better spread propaganda.

thousands of US military members are now stationed in Australia, supposedly to keep China in check militarily.

beware US government shills that are posting from Australia.

they're not all Australians.

Last Edited by Anonymous Cowherder on 12/26/2012 08:16 PM
I'm a Libertarian Constitutionalist.

I don't give a shit what you do with your own life, whether you make it a success or a failure, that is the outcome of the choices you make, but please take responsibility for yourself and don't make ME pay for YOUR choices and we're all good.

Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Apportionment Act of 1911!

Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be.

Restore the Republic.

It's a flower, not something to be feared.

cow - Moo!
Screwed Geese
User ID: 29747300
United States
12/26/2012 07:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way?
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


If the parents of the dead children are not acting and going through horrific trauma do you not think that it's disrespectful to conspire against them online.

There is no proof the victims are in on it, i for one do believe real children with loving families were killed during this massacre and the subject should be approached with compassion.
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 07:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Children Stolen?

Possibly.


[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29358702
United States
12/26/2012 08:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30443180
Norway
12/26/2012 08:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
all information is GOOD FOR YOU!...... bad for teh lame that cannot tell the difference.. but those are probably the ones you are reading about anyhow... *cough*
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 08:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
all information is GOOD FOR YOU!...... bad for teh lame that cannot tell the difference.. but those are probably the ones you are reading about anyhow... *cough*
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30443180


Norway huh!?

Absolute and Total Fucking Mayhem.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18681750
United States
12/26/2012 08:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Yep, I got the message about this, since I'm a member over there.

I found it pretty shocking, and so I just left their site and came back over here, for the day. That used to be my favorite site, and I was a daily poster, but in the last year it has become dull. I used to get most of my news from there, but the members are not on top of things as well as they used to be.

And, of course, on topic...... censorship of 911 and now sandy hook. Pathetic.

These sites are NOT for sympathy, they are for conversation and vetting of information we are fed as citizens. Without the crazy theories talked about, we could not get to the bottom of all the crazy stuff that goes on around the world.

GLP has become my favorite of this type of site for the last few months.

Thanks all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29747300
United States
12/26/2012 08:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way?
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


If the parents of the dead children are not acting and going through horrific trauma do you not think that it's disrespectful to conspire against them online.

There is no proof the victims are in on it, i for one do believe real children with loving families were killed during this massacre and the subject should be approached with compassion.
 Quoting: Kat Woman



 Quoting: Screwed Geese 29747300


Devoted Follower
User ID: 28055738
United States
12/26/2012 08:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Who even uses that site any more?

It's a crap site...amongst the worst of all the conspiracy sites imo...

burnit
Suntar

User ID: 29216381
United States
12/26/2012 08:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Yep, I got the message about this, since I'm a member over there.

I found it pretty shocking, and so I just left their site and came back over here, for the day. That used to be my favorite site, and I was a daily poster, but in the last year it has become dull. I used to get most of my news from there, but the members are not on top of things as well as they used to be.

And, of course, on topic...... censorship of 911 and now sandy hook. Pathetic.

These sites are NOT for sympathy, they are for conversation and vetting of information we are fed as citizens. Without the crazy theories talked about, we could not get to the bottom of all the crazy stuff that goes on around the world.

GLP has become my favorite of this type of site for the last few months.

Thanks all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18681750


The same 3 or 4 posters making sure to derail the threads just before/as a moderator comes in and shuts off the discussion. Same 3-4 people. One of them has been curiously absent today, however.

Here is much better!
I'm not sure what to believe. But at least we get to have a discussion. There? There's a select few people who are intent to ensure nothing is discussed.
hf hf hf

Last Edited by Suntar on 12/26/2012 08:41 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13806508
United States
12/26/2012 08:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


You're right. The "grieving parents are actors" charges were completely inane and of course could not be substantiated so why discredit the site by allowing that crap.

There was also some fairly heinous libel directed at people who were only connected to the story by the "research" of basement commandos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28047859
United States
12/26/2012 08:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29338719


Are we really sure their are victims. So many lies and deception maybe everything was staged. There are to many lies to know what or if any of the story is true. I sure hope no kids got hurt and its just one huge setup for the public to bash gun ownership...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23409930
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 09:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


What kind of Statist BS is that?
Seeking the Truth is disrespectful to the victims?
How disrespectful(to the innocent) is it to let the REAL perpetrators get away with their Murder?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30895595


Kat Woman is a classic example of a naive traumatized mind controlled person. Such a person will say anything in hopes they might persuade others to stop revealing the truth.

She will play on any potential guilt an investigator has. Simple but often effective, as that sort of shaming/humiliation tactic is what was used on her at a young age when she innocently questioned the hypocritical authority figures who were handling her.

Bad Karma sucks. And then you become a shill for the matrix.

Wittingly or unwittingly, the result is the same.

Blue pill.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


Lol.

So me saying why I THINK they banned it makes me a traumatized mind control victim. Makes me wonder where you get that type of knowledge from. Fuck you you arragont know it all. Calling me naive for an opinion i have in a heavily manipulated world. Well Done you have a gold star.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13806508
United States
12/26/2012 09:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Are we really sure their are victims. So many lies and deception maybe everything was staged. There are to many lies to know what or if any of the story is true. I sure hope no kids got hurt and its just one huge setup for the public to bash gun ownership...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28047859


Some times the "official story" is more or less the real story.

It's a lot easier psychologically to imagine the world is under control (even nefarious control) than to accept that we ultimately live in a world of chaos where random, uncontrollable crap can happen to you or even innocent little kids at any time.

Instead of indulging in inane speculation about Sandy Hook we should be focused on the CTs that are right out in the open; such as HSBC basically getting a giant "get out of jail free card" for laundering drug money.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23409930
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 09:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman



To not question the official story is the ultimate disrespect to the victims as it allows their murderers and the co-conspirators to get away free and probably kill again. WAKE UP, you're sleep walking again.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1524722


Im refering to the accusations being made against the victims families nothing else
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30924542
United States
12/26/2012 09:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


HSBC, a British bank did. Oh, I noticed you reside in the United Kingdom. What a coincidence!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30906758
United States
12/26/2012 09:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Oomgawa Timba!

Unk Tantor!!!

loser
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1524722
United States
12/26/2012 09:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way?
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


If the parents of the dead children are not acting and going through horrific trauma do you not think that it's disrespectful to conspire against them online.

There is no proof the victims are in on it, i for one do believe real children with loving families were killed during this massacre and the subject should be approached with compassion.
 Quoting: Kat Woman



 Quoting: Screwed Geese 29747300



That is extremely strange about the kid's black & red dress. The father who was in another video smiling and laughing before he started acting serious on cue, is very odd too. But with the dress, which is obviously the same style of dress - could there have been more than one made, like maybe all the little girls had the same dress for special occasions? Don't some families dress their kids alike for an Xmas photo shoot?

That's the only thing I can think of because it would be exceedingly strange to give a child it's just murdered's sibling's dress to wear for a photo shoot with the President. And would the dress even fit her?

So, I'm wondering if it's just a duplicate and maybe all the kids had the same dress.

News