Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,041 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 249,569
Pageviews Today: 343,799Threads Today: 85Posts Today: 1,448
02:04 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation

 
ru1im2

User ID: 29925399
Mongolia
12/26/2012 09:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


siren2shillsiren2
Let Freedom Ring

User ID: 28037869
United States
12/26/2012 09:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


What victims?
Propagandiated

User ID: 7365566
United States
12/26/2012 10:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


What victims?
 Quoting: Let Freedom Ring
What, you didn't see all the victims those heroic first responders rushed out of the school with after the gunman was dead?

Oh yeah, they were all turned away.
Nothing to see here.
Propagandiated
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23596406
United States
12/27/2012 01:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


What victims?
 Quoting: Let Freedom Ring
What, you didn't see all the victims those heroic first responders rushed out of the school with after the gunman was dead?

Oh yeah, they were all turned away.
Nothing to see here.
 Quoting: Propagandiated


That type of talk can get you thrown in jail, pally!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30931251
United States
12/27/2012 01:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Lol those losers are CIA shills. The owners say chemtrails aren't real!

Lol

Frauds. Stay away
anonymous1234

User ID: 30851475
United States
12/27/2012 02:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I have studied this info carefully. The Sandy Hook ordeal is a hoax.

I am unsure how they got the school to go along with it. But, it was a psyop.

The evidence all points to this:

1) no bodies ever shown by media not even a drop of blood
2) bodies removed after dark (they would have been decomposing at this time
3) theft of photos on facebook to be used as victims
4)gun problems...which gun was used and of course we know the kid could not pull this off thus you needed multiple shooters
5) use of actors to play parts of family members
6) no significant crying or outcry from families
7) clearly the president acted like he was crying but was not moved at all
8) immediate move to hit second amendment
9) type of guns used are the ones they are always using in these psyops to get them banned
10) changing stories by mass media to confuse and misdirect
11) misdirection of the ssri drug info to get motive as none exists
12) lies about mom working at school to try to give reason why school was selected
13) no arrests even though we saw arrests (there was no crime committed)
14) bodies unclaimed
15) no identifying of bodies
16) no interviews of lanza family
17) closed casket funerals to hide they are empty

I can go on and on but you get the point. No evidence of a real murder. None.

Hope this helps.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13310174
United States
12/27/2012 02:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman



To not question the official story is the ultimate disrespect to the victims as it allows their murderers and the co-conspirators to get away free and probably kill again. WAKE UP, you're sleep walking again.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1524722


and you are plain lying.

you think anyone considers for one minute you believe what you are claiming?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30912042



You obviously don't even know what the fuck I am claiming. I can see that we're winning and waking people up on this topic because all the stinking pieces of shit shills like you come festering up out of your black ops sewers.

THIS IS WHAT I CLAIM: That there are professional hit teams in the US assembled, funded and managed by black ops agencies, who go around this country in groups of 2-3 agents and who arrange these mass shootings and then frame some poor patsy as the killer. These are PROFESSIONAL DEATH SQUADS as have been used in many other countries and times, and I believe they are involved in shootings like Sandy Hook, Aurora, Sikh Temple and others I'm sure.

I find that far more believable than some 110 lb autistic kid took all these guns and rifles and body armor...from his MOTHER...whom he killed and then went and stormed some school neither he nor she had any connection with despite the never ending onslaught of LEO and MSM LIES - repeated LIES.

And YOU are a lying sack of shit and someday you'll come down with the rest of these evil fucks who do this to children. FUCK YOU ASSHOLE.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1524722


clappa
Paradise Havona

User ID: 1405948
United States
12/27/2012 02:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29338719


finding the truth is never disrespectful
i get on this site... way too much
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30936798
South Africa
12/27/2012 02:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30899012


And people wonder why the UK is a fuckhole?!
You PC Poms are the reason for 90% of the bullshit in this world. Here's hoping you all get fucked up by the muzzies really soon...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13310174
United States
12/27/2012 02:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
This really seems to be the line in the sand with everyone. Maybe 12/21/2012 wasn't so off...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27002733
United States
12/27/2012 11:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
What else have they done?
9/11, US and Israel:
[link to www.amazon.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 19868668
United States
12/27/2012 02:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
The site has not banned discussion of the topic altogether, however, it looks like they have prohibited certain TYPES of speculation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19868668


They just got sick of you fantasizing, and using their bandwidth to drool your mental issues on to the net...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30906758





Your logic is clearly about as shit as your intellect, considering they are still allowing all types of inane, highly speculative drivel and blatant fantasization.

And who said I was posting anything on this topic over there?

You seem to assume a lot.

Really says something about you.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 19868668
United States
12/27/2012 02:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
And for the shills who constantly harp on about "speculation" and "no facts".... Pay attention to the fact that we are in a time of alleged democracy and freedom where your freedoms can be revoked indefinitely under speculation by the us government or military without due process if they deem it necessary (which is increasing it would seem)

Yet this is quietly overlooked, and a "truther" or "conspiracist" is demonised and/or censored.

Go figure.
 Quoting: Taboo 30905817


Demonized?

Not letting you pollute their privately owned website is 'censoring' you?

laugh

Fucking children...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30906758




Yes, it's the very definition of "censorship" you mental midget.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 19868668
United States
12/27/2012 02:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
They probably were worried about being sued because you freaks are dragging totally innocent people into this shit with KNOWN FALSE INFO.

You should all be ashamed.

bumpbumpbump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30842846




That's complete BS. As I explained it is not libel. No one would confuse that website for a "legitimate news source," but rather, (even as they say themselves)a site that provides user-driven and created content.

It is a public message board, full of private citizens stating their opinion.

And most of them do state that it is only their OPINION and not fact.

So that libel claim is BS, and they know it. And I think maybe you know it too.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 19868668
United States
12/27/2012 02:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
And before someone brings it up again, I'll re-state that I think the other angle is BS too. The "they did it so as not to upset the advertisers," thing.


The advertisers knew who they were signing up with. Nameably a CONSPIRACY SITE, on which SPECULATION occurs (the kind of speculation much of the mainstream considers nutty) and speculation which often QUESTIONS the official story.

Furthermore, alienating, censoring, and pissing off your AUDIENCE just to satisfy your ADVERTISERS makes no business sense whatsoever. Without millions of regular pageviews, those advertisers are worthless.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1073423
United Kingdom
12/27/2012 02:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
That place isn't a conspiracy site, it's for children to spout fairy tales ... a family entertainment venue like Disneyland.

Their logo should look like this ~ [link to www.parentwellbeing.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30662905
United States
12/27/2012 02:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
That place isn't a conspiracy site, it's for children to spout fairy tales ... a family entertainment venue like Disneyland.

Their logo should look like this ~ [link to www.parentwellbeing.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1073423


Its no GLP thats for sure.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30926647
United States
12/27/2012 02:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I looked through the forum and I can't find the thread that was on their front page. The last time I was there it was on page 74.

The member who started the thread, has not posted for a view days now. On the profile it says he, sorry she is taking a posting break. But on "mood" it says posting banned.

So there you go, people looking for the truth are being restricted from posting. Yesterday I saw a thread about censorship and they shut that one down too.


s226
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 19868668
United States
12/27/2012 08:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Yeah, I forgot to mention the truly funny part of this as well. The cherry on top. And I really hope the men behind the scenes at that other site see this, and understand it to be true. Not just for myself, but likely for A LOT of people.


I've been following the Sandy Hook incident like many of you since it occurred. Now I haven't been following it religiously or obsessively or anything like that. My interest was more "casual" I suppose you could say. It was apparent to me very quickly that there were some oddities and anomalies, and conflicted "facts" in the mainstream account. However, I was very far from convinced that this was a "false flag," event. I figured there was SOMETHING weird, but not necessarily that it was a false flag, or staged, or had something else MAJOR going on.

However, when I saw what Skeptic and Springer's "official" reactions to this were... when I saw them react exactly as they did regarding the 9/11 no planes talk, when I saw them react almost exactly as they did regarding the allegations that they are NSA / CIA / DoD / Cointelpro, etc.... that raised a bigger flag for me than almost anything else could have.

They were very clearly trying to steer discussion in a certain direction, clearly trying to censor certain information and veiwpoints, and they were very clearly using some classic COINTELPRO tactics. Shame, guilt, ridicule, topical shift, threats, and so on.

They say that they won't allow people to "destroy" the site they've worked so hard to build. I find that ironic, as they don't see suppressing the discussion which a LARGE portion of their member-base wanted to see as "destructive." How insane.

If their stated reasons for this censorship are true, then they're a bunch of sellouts, who care more about advertising dollars than the truth. Denying Ignorance, indeed. Just because they don't personally believe it's the truth, or find it distasteful, is not a reason to silence their members. A lot of people find it distasteful to think that our government may have set up the kennedy brothers to be killed, or that "9/11 was an inside job." Some people find such ideas HIGHLY distasteful and even offensive. Those were all tragic incidents where people died. Why should this be different? Because it's children?

I hate to see children harmed as well. Who wouldn't? And nor would I want to offend anyone who was truly grieving. But if these guys think that the sandy hook parents are googling themselves, or even better, reading threads on some CONSPIRACY SITE, then they're absolutely delusional or ignorant, or otherwise want us to think so.

You don't want to see the site you worked on, so long and hard, to be destroyed? Then perhaps you shouldn't make poor decisions which piss off your audience. Perhaps you shouldn't try to shame and ridicule them. Perhaps you shouldn't, dare I say, possibly HELP COVER UP SOMETHING ROTTEN IN DENMARK.

It would be truly ironic and rather amusing if this were the thing which made a majority of people realize that the site in question is just a COINTELPRO op.

Of course, if that were true they would probably just have their crack team of paid trolls create a few hundred new accounts and post up a storm.

lol

Did anyone else notice that in that thread (the one where they made the censorship announcement) there were a couple members you had never seen before? Members whose registration dates were not new... 2010 or earlier even, maybe, and yet they only had a few hundred posts, many of which in the sandy threads? Just an observation... I'm sure it doesn't mean anything.

whatever
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30988094
Canada
12/27/2012 08:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
This website is POS.

I get banned for no reason all the time. I just got off an apparent ban that started on the 21st.

All I can guess is where it says

"We sometimes ban entire ISPs" I guess since mine is a large one they banned it for a short period.

All websites these days are ran to promote the Operators own personal agenda and it's pathetic.

What the internet has become is pathetic.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30988094
Canada
12/27/2012 08:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
What's amusing is where it says

"If you pay us we will unban you."

LOL I'll pay you to lick my dick.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 19868668
United States
12/27/2012 08:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
TL;DR

What I was saying above, in summary, is that I thought some of the facts and reports regarding the Sandy Hook shooting seemed odd, before they censored its discussion over there. But I really didn't think it was a "false flag" or completely staged like a lot of people saying.

However, when I saw how similar their reaction was, to the time they tried to censor / steer the 9/11 discussion, or even kind of their refutation regarding being COINTELPRO... well, that was nearly enough to make me want to take a MAJOR second (and third, etc) look at the Sandy Hook thing.

So great job, guys, in flipping some of us to the other side, and spreading the kind of discussion you wanted to squash. Maybe it's not happening on your precious site any longer... but trust me when I say that you've created a monster.

A hungry one.

A curious one.


rant
Children of the Atom

User ID: 20257839
United States
12/27/2012 09:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29338719


clappa
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1461405
United States
12/27/2012 09:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
No need to look at any conspiracy sites for the truth
of what really happened at Sandy Hook...

... Just look at these 3 regular sites:

[link to www.truthin7minutes.com]
[link to sandyhookhoax.blogspot.com]
[link to www.sandyhookhoax.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21190903
Canada
12/27/2012 09:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
What's amusing is where it says

"If you pay us we will unban you."

LOL I'll pay you to lick my dick.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30988094


and here i thought that the admin was a decent man, nope, just another greedy scamming @#$!#$%
also i don't believe anyone died, it was all fabricated news, all actors, none of it happened, all prerecorded and scripted.
all witnesses are actors.
you're all sheep!
go back to facebook!
i personally am going back to LoP, at least there there is a honest admin.
B
User ID: 30552017
United States
12/28/2012 08:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Part Five of my continuing Sandy Hook coverage is now up online. You don't wanna miss this one: new shocking revelations! [link to www.brendanhunt.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30926647
United States
12/28/2012 02:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Another summary on Rodia, who is not at all ruled out as of yet, read the update here:

[link to www.insanemedia.net]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31018424
United Kingdom
12/28/2012 02:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I have posted something on there today and its still there. Its titled have people forgot the child day care center being bombed , or words to that effect. It then goes on to say "what makes people thing sandy is any different?". Or more words to that effect.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27515407
United States
12/28/2012 04:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
What's amusing is where it says

"If you pay us we will unban you."

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30988094


um that's exactly what glp does too...
iix

User ID: 30823473
Australia
12/30/2012 01:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
No need to look at any conspiracy sites for the truth
of what really happened at Sandy Hook...

... Just look at these 3 regular sites:

[link to www.truthin7minutes.com]
[link to sandyhookhoax.blogspot.com]
[link to www.sandyhookhoax.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1461405

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!