Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30899012 United Kingdom 12/26/2012 02:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well just a thought anyway... Quoting: Kat Woman I'm sure you will all continue to think that a certain conspiracy site is attempting to cover things up regardless of what is said here. In this case, yes I will. And I'm far from the only one. Nothing said HERE is likely to make me believe otherwise. They would need to change or drastically clarify this policy. It is obvious censorship. The stated reasons are logically unsound. They are also engaging in classic cointelpro tactics (ridicule, shame) as if threat of the ban hammer were not enough. As stated, the only other time I've seen them react this strongly in the way of trying to threaten long-time members (there's that alienating the audience again) and steer discussion was the 9/11 no planes thing... and look how many people think THAT was a conspiracy. What else are we supposed to believe? Well what do you believe? Why do you think they would ban it there and not HERE. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 19868668 United States 12/26/2012 02:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I should point out the truly ironic thing here is that I was completely on the fence, and even leaning toward "this was a genuine tragedy," until they pulled this crap. But I've read enough of their denials and guilt-tripping (re: 9/11 "no planes" and re: they = cointelpro) to see the stark similarities between those incidents, and their reaction to the speculation on this subject. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30899012 United Kingdom 12/26/2012 02:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30894122 Australia 12/26/2012 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12269654 United States 12/26/2012 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims Quoting: Kat Woman Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way? If the parents of the dead children are not acting and going through horrific trauma do you not think that it's disrespectful to conspire against them online. There is no proof the victims are in on it, i for one do believe real children with loving families were killed during this massacre and the subject should be approached with compassion. he never said anything about the victims famlies being "in on it" (WHICH THERE IS SOME PROOF OF) Discussing a topic whether each person has their facts straight or not doesn't mean they are "conspiring against" anyone or anything. discussing this issue is not a conspiracy. everyone's opinion on each even that took place that day and how are not all right so don't try to roll all the theories, ideas, and evidence into one lump and say they all impliment the victims. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23409930 United Kingdom 12/26/2012 03:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
HippyAwakened User ID: 1667285 United States 12/26/2012 03:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
GladioDaddy-O User ID: 22439147 United States 12/26/2012 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 19868668 United States 12/26/2012 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30906758 United States 12/26/2012 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Taboo User ID: 30905817 Spain 12/26/2012 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At every upload on the net, it is being pulled down even to this day. I managed to watch it about 4 days ago, sent the web link to a couple of friends and my friend in Australia said half way through watching it got pulled down, and the other friend I sent it to never got to see it. This film was aired in Cannes last year and covers Princess Dianas death (murder) in depth that gives some very telling information about the royals and the media cover up. Unilateral censorship of anything is always curious and very telling. Whether it be the establishment in the UK or the establishment in the US (and we all know they are intrinsically linked) "they" are running a test to expose and eliminate those who are awake to their antics aswell as measuring to what extent their antics are not discernible to the average "joe public" The Internet is the only consciousness they haven't managed to fully control so they are trying to find ways to subvert "free speech" without waking "average joe" (who is in the majority) in the process. "They" exploit the fact that so many cannot wield their intuition or critically analyse anything independent to what they have been offered by the "authority" of the controlled media...visually. |
Suntar User ID: 29216381 United States 12/26/2012 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The site has not banned discussion of the topic altogether, however, it looks like they have prohibited certain TYPES of speculation. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19868668 They just got sick of you fantasizing, and using their bandwidth to drool your mental issues on to the net... Well now, that's objective... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30906758 United States 12/26/2012 03:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The site has not banned discussion of the topic altogether, however, it looks like they have prohibited certain TYPES of speculation. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19868668 They just got sick of you fantasizing, and using their bandwidth to drool your mental issues on to the net... Well now, that's objective... Aww...Did I upset you? |
Taboo User ID: 30905817 Spain 12/26/2012 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And for the shills who constantly harp on about "speculation" and "no facts".... Pay attention to the fact that we are in a time of alleged democracy and freedom where your freedoms can be revoked indefinitely under speculation by the us government or military without due process if they deem it necessary (which is increasing it would seem) Yet this is quietly overlooked, and a "truther" or "conspiracist" is demonised and/or censored. Go figure. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30906758 United States 12/26/2012 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And for the shills who constantly harp on about "speculation" and "no facts".... Pay attention to the fact that we are in a time of alleged democracy and freedom where your freedoms can be revoked indefinitely under speculation by the us government or military without due process if they deem it necessary (which is increasing it would seem) Quoting: Taboo 30905817 Yet this is quietly overlooked, and a "truther" or "conspiracist" is demonised and/or censored. Go figure. Demonized? Not letting you pollute their privately owned website is 'censoring' you? Fucking children... |
Suntar User ID: 29216381 United States 12/26/2012 04:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30896588 United Kingdom 12/26/2012 04:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And for the shills who constantly harp on about "speculation" and "no facts".... Pay attention to the fact that we are in a time of alleged democracy and freedom where your freedoms can be revoked indefinitely under speculation by the us government or military without due process if they deem it necessary (which is increasing it would seem) Quoting: Taboo 30905817 Yet this is quietly overlooked, and a "truther" or "conspiracist" is demonised and/or censored. Go figure. Demonized? Not letting you pollute their privately owned website is 'censoring' you? Fucking children... Obvious shill is obvious. |
Ralph--a house dog User ID: 25802009 United States 12/26/2012 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims Quoting: Kat Woman Bullshit. If I were a victim of something like that I'd come back and haunt everybody's ass until the truth came out! Don't you think their souls deserve it? Last Edited by Ralph--a house dog on 12/26/2012 04:24 PM "Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night.....Rage, rage against the dying of the light"-----Dylan Thomas HIS NAME IS SETH RICH [link to biblicalselfdefense.com] [link to forum.1111ers.blog] Always remember that "for the greater good" will not include YOU. "Who decides?" ---Robert A. Heinlein -'Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.'—Benjamin Franklin [link to www.westcoasttruth.com] The only thing worth paying full retail for is pantyhose. You cannot do all of the good the world needs, but the world needs all of the good you can do. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1375041 United States 12/26/2012 04:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Cowherder Stop the inanity! User ID: 28230270 United States 12/26/2012 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And for the shills who constantly harp on about "speculation" and "no facts".... Pay attention to the fact that we are in a time of alleged democracy and freedom where your freedoms can be revoked indefinitely under speculation by the us government or military without due process if they deem it necessary (which is increasing it would seem) Quoting: Taboo 30905817 Yet this is quietly overlooked, and a "truther" or "conspiracist" is demonised and/or censored. Go figure. Demonized? Not letting you pollute their privately owned website is 'censoring' you? Fucking children... way to prove a point. Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared. - Moo! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23409930 United Kingdom 12/26/2012 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims Quoting: Kat Woman Bullshit. If I were a victim of something like that I'd come back and haunt everybody's ass until the truth came out! Don't you think their souls deserve it? I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims Quoting: Kat Woman Bullshit. If I were a victim of something like that I'd come back and haunt everybody's ass until the truth came out! Don't you think their souls deserve it? of course, im refering to the speculations about that some of the victims are not victims at all but in on it. This may be why they have put a stop to it over there, what if people have seen it and complained etc. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1216538 United States 12/26/2012 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4032947 United States 12/26/2012 04:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1188564 United Kingdom 12/26/2012 04:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That website can go suck a fuck after I criticised their stupid 'conspiracy girls' agenda. I stated that a conspiracy show shouldn't isolate genders or stereotype against others and was promptly permabanned for arguing my case. If I was trolling, posting graphic images, or porn then it's understandable. But to be permabanned just for questioning 'their' motives is retarded. |
Suntar User ID: 29216381 United States 12/26/2012 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11360402 United States 12/26/2012 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims Quoting: Kat Woman Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way? There's No official story. Your information gathering is inconsistent,that's why Your so wrong. |
GladioDaddy-O User ID: 22439147 United States 12/26/2012 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims Quoting: Kat Woman Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way? There's No official story. Your information gathering is inconsistent,that's why Your so wrong. Check my information gathering on the threads I've posted, shill. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30842846 United States 12/26/2012 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25635188 United States 12/26/2012 05:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "The victims of Sandy Hook deserve to know the truth".YOU ASS CLOWN, YOU ARE NOT A VICTIM OF SANDY HOOK!!!!!!!!!!!! You are a moron destroying the lives of innocent people whose children were gunned down by a fucking maniac. You are pure evil.I hope they hunt you people down and prosecute every last one of you.If I were one of those poor parents I can fucking assure I would get you. Pure fucking evil to be revictimized by pack of conspiracy keyboard morons. Pure unaldulterated evil.Karma's a bitch baby, you'd better watch out. |
Paco Lips User ID: 30683467 United States 12/26/2012 05:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims Quoting: Kat Woman Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way? exactly.....basically any one trying to get to the truth these days are disrespectful. |