Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,932 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 466,287
Pageviews Today: 817,347Threads Today: 336Posts Today: 5,180
10:29 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
Yeah, I forgot to mention the truly funny part of this as well. The cherry on top. And I really hope the men behind the scenes at that other site see this, and understand it to be true. Not just for myself, but likely for A LOT of people.


I've been following the Sandy Hook incident like many of you since it occurred. Now I haven't been following it religiously or obsessively or anything like that. My interest was more "casual" I suppose you could say. It was apparent to me very quickly that there were some oddities and anomalies, and conflicted "facts" in the mainstream account. However, I was very far from convinced that this was a "false flag," event. I figured there was SOMETHING weird, but not necessarily that it was a false flag, or staged, or had something else MAJOR going on.

However, when I saw what Skeptic and Springer's "official" reactions to this were... when I saw them react exactly as they did regarding the 9/11 no planes talk, when I saw them react almost exactly as they did regarding the allegations that they are NSA / CIA / DoD / Cointelpro, etc.... that raised a bigger flag for me than almost anything else could have.

They were very clearly trying to steer discussion in a certain direction, clearly trying to censor certain information and veiwpoints, and they were very clearly using some classic COINTELPRO tactics. Shame, guilt, ridicule, topical shift, threats, and so on.

They say that they won't allow people to "destroy" the site they've worked so hard to build. I find that ironic, as they don't see suppressing the discussion which a LARGE portion of their member-base wanted to see as "destructive." How insane.

If their stated reasons for this censorship are true, then they're a bunch of sellouts, who care more about advertising dollars than the truth. Denying Ignorance, indeed. Just because they don't personally believe it's the truth, or find it distasteful, is not a reason to silence their members. A lot of people find it distasteful to think that our government may have set up the kennedy brothers to be killed, or that "9/11 was an inside job." Some people find such ideas HIGHLY distasteful and even offensive. Those were all tragic incidents where people died. Why should this be different? Because it's children?

I hate to see children harmed as well. Who wouldn't? And nor would I want to offend anyone who was truly grieving. But if these guys think that the sandy hook parents are googling themselves, or even better, reading threads on some CONSPIRACY SITE, then they're absolutely delusional or ignorant, or otherwise want us to think so.

You don't want to see the site you worked on, so long and hard, to be destroyed? Then perhaps you shouldn't make poor decisions which piss off your audience. Perhaps you shouldn't try to shame and ridicule them. Perhaps you shouldn't, dare I say, possibly HELP COVER UP SOMETHING ROTTEN IN DENMARK.

It would be truly ironic and rather amusing if this were the thing which made a majority of people realize that the site in question is just a COINTELPRO op.

Of course, if that were true they would probably just have their crack team of paid trolls create a few hundred new accounts and post up a storm.

lol

Did anyone else notice that in that thread (the one where they made the censorship announcement) there were a couple members you had never seen before? Members whose registration dates were not new... 2010 or earlier even, maybe, and yet they only had a few hundred posts, many of which in the sandy threads? Just an observation... I'm sure it doesn't mean anything.

whatever
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP