Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,360 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 259,442
Pageviews Today: 339,629Threads Today: 56Posts Today: 1,311
02:41 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Liberals vs. Convervatives (Democracy vs Republic)

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30995077
United States
12/28/2012 07:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Liberals vs. Convervatives (Democracy vs Republic)
Which side will you pick?

Red or Blue?
The Right or the Left?
Republican or Democrat?
Conservative or Liberal?
Turd Sandwich or Giant Douche?
Manu-Koelbren

User ID: 29289144
Spain
12/28/2012 08:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Liberals vs. Convervatives (Democracy vs Republic)
The liberals are not really democrats, most of them would privately admit that they long for a socialist utopia. They don't want freedom, they want state intervention in everything. They believe the state knows best how to administer a nation that the citizens themselves.
"White privilege" is the liberal religion's version of Original Sin: you are born guilty, and you carry that burden of guilt all your life, and the only way to escape eternal damnation is for white people confess their sin, to bow, kneel and believe the dogma of the Church of Liberalism, genuflect at its altars, honor its saints, fill the collection plate, and never, ever doubt.

-- Dixon Diaz
Manu-Koelbren

User ID: 29289144
Spain
12/28/2012 08:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Liberals vs. Convervatives (Democracy vs Republic)
The liberals are not really democrats, most of them would privately admit that they long for a socialist utopia. They don't want freedom, they want state intervention in everything. They believe the state knows best how to administer a nation that the citizens themselves.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


And they're actually right, in the multicultural, degenerate societies that they have fomented only a ruthless police state can control the chaos that naturally ensues. In an unicultural, strongly moral society supported by a culturally apt and racially good population however, you can actually enjoy freedom and prosperity instead of an Orwellian nightmare. That's exactly why the liberals have boycotted all these things because they're in fact antagonistic to freedom as this brings a social dynamic which creates diversity instead of uniformity, and thus inequality comes to exist. There are suddenly those who succeed and those who fail and for a liberal this is not admissible.
"White privilege" is the liberal religion's version of Original Sin: you are born guilty, and you carry that burden of guilt all your life, and the only way to escape eternal damnation is for white people confess their sin, to bow, kneel and believe the dogma of the Church of Liberalism, genuflect at its altars, honor its saints, fill the collection plate, and never, ever doubt.

-- Dixon Diaz
NSF001

User ID: 31008224
United Kingdom
12/28/2012 08:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Liberals vs. Convervatives (Democracy vs Republic)
There aren't sides as you describe it. Left/Right has been built up to accomodate TPTB, to let them say and do things that are completely contradictory.

Left and Right as they are thought of are designed to polarise the masses into two opposing camps. They do this by extrapolating single issue, a prime example is 'racism'. People who identify early on with anti-racism see their beliefs reflected in the anti-fa section. They will then commit to the side with the anti-fascists and will call it the left and self-identify as leftists.
If classical liberalism was leftist neo-liberalism is anything but, with the attacks on free speech, constant support for war and adoration of government interventionism. Point these things out to any self-identifying 'leftist' and they will simply not believe it, or even be able to see your point. They identify with their vision of what the left is and that is part of their personality. The same goes for people who support the right to bear arms, who will self-identify with the right, and may end up supporting other policies simply because that is what the talking heads on their side say.

Ultimately that's where they made the division, cutting the populace right in two by drawing the invisible boxes of the left/right paradigm in your mind. How it works in practice is that politicians, and those behind the scenes that support them through MSM propoganda and capital, are able to subtlety change their stance over a number of years taking some support from the other side to make up for that lost by selling out the ideas that first attracted votes to them.

A current example was highlighted in an article from the independent the other day, I can't find a digital version but it was about how Prime Minister David Cameron is trying to raise his appeal amongst gay voters, who traditionally support one of the more 'leftist' parties. Cameron publically supported Gay Marriage despite the majority of his party being against it. The bill was defeated but Cameron can always bring this up in the future and play on it. This was done because Camerons standing in his party, especially among the traditional conservitives had fallen because of his indecisosn on Europe. He and his backers are making up for lost support by harvesting extra gay vote. This is a prime example of a 'right to left' switch. The exact same thing works in reverse.

Sorry if this is hard to read, I was thinig something along these lines in bed last night and am at work the now so just blurted it out but there is a point in here somewhere.
I don't think so,
he's up there with the others laying low,
vying with those who you've traded your life to to bless your soul,
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31013220
United States
12/28/2012 08:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Liberals vs. Convervatives (Democracy vs Republic)
Which side will you pick?

Red or Blue?
The Right or the Left?
Republican or Democrat?
Conservative or Liberal?
Turd Sandwich or Giant Douche?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30995077


The present day Republican Party are not Conservatives. They are, in fact, statists, although not of the same evil flavor as the Communists/Democrats.

Learn to read before you attempt to right.
Ostria1

User ID: 29325791
Greece
12/28/2012 08:47 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Liberals vs. Convervatives (Democracy vs Republic)
They say "the extreems meet".. this is what i believe.
Ostria
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26952109
United States
12/28/2012 08:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Liberals vs. Convervatives (Democracy vs Republic)
I am a constitutionalist. I believe TRUE conservatives are the only way our country can survive. How anyone could give a liberalism credit for anything is beyond me. Everything liberals touch they ruin. Lets do an example.. divide the country in half. One side a republic where capitalism rules.. the other a liberal utopia where socialism rules.

On the capitalists side people would be able to keep all their earnings but for a small amount to run enough government to keep their part of the country safe. Business would flourish.. if they could not provide a product or a service which was worthy of the publics money they would fail.. schools, highway dept, libraries, on and on would be privately owned, would be successfull if they produced and the public liked their management etc. Medicine would advance, new medical breakthroughs ... science, basic humanity needs would be abundant and worthy of the money people paid to buy them. The cost of items and goods and services would be low due to less government intervention epa regulations .. on and on..

ON the liberals side there would be poverty, due to lack of productivity. Taxes would be high due to all the government agencies and control. The government would be heading off a cliff on a daily basis due to the fact too few workers to support those who feel they are entitled to being taken care of and not having to participate in the tax input. Due to lack of finanicial insentives there would be lower medical advancment, building projects slow and done poorly also due to pride, poor work ethics.. people would be governed in everything they do .. big brother in its attempt to spread the wealth has found that eventually it will run out of other peoples money and they did. Schools would be breeding grounds for illiterate jail birds.. teachers more concerned about the quality of their benefits than the quality of their students education.. snow removal would get done when the lazy arse driver decided it was time to go to work.. making sure all his benefits were up to snuff before he got out in the miserable cold..

You get the picture. One side believes in the Bill of Rights were NO |HUMAN is to touch these laws bestowed upon our land by our Creator. The constitution is the bible for all laws, rules, culture is guided by this paper written by the brillance of men who gave all they had to ensure this great nation remained free .. free from a tyranny, free from a government which over steps its bounds.
The other side constantly attempting an assault against its citizens.. chipping away the laws God granted man.. constantly making laws which are intrusive, smothering, controlling, privacy invaded..

Ask someone who came here from Europe behind the iron curtain.. ask them about how innocent socialism is and where it ultimately leads. We are only one generation away from the communist wall in Germany .. take a look back in history then GET SMART.. let those who want socialism to have it some where else.. Oh and do not forget to take a really good look at the leaders where socialism on further to marxism to communism..the leaders live very well.. like KINGS and Queens.. while the unwashed masses live in squaller. Does Obama and his merry wife remind you of this? Oppulence as opposed to suffering joblessness homelessness.. all the while they say they CARE.. anyone who believes their lies deserve to live under their rule.

News