Reporter Tells the Truth! | |
guncontrolltard2 User ID: 31003984 United States 12/28/2012 11:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Romney knows how to run a successful business, the negro doesn't have a clue...but we let the children vote in Santa... Quoting: BRIEF i dont get it either brief, when you look at america from the outside,you guys look like retards, assholes ,idiots crooks con men cocksuckers, i could go on and on, but what we really want to know is why you let it continue, we guess its cause americans are cowards and have no real purpose other than to be the worlds biggest population of douche bag losers,,, whay you say? |
Sledster User ID: 30917618 United States 12/28/2012 11:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: KillerKoodaaa i dont get it either brief, when you look at america from the outside,you guys look like retards, assholes ,idiots crooks con men cocksuckers, i could go on and on, but what we really want to know is why you let it continue, we guess its cause americans are cowards and have no real purpose other than to be the worlds biggest population of douche bag losers,,, whay you say? I've been a land owner since I was able to vote at 18. Since then I have voted straight republican because I am against welfare and socialism, yet even before my time the non land owners were allowed to vote and that's what fucked things up...so while I was building a career and a family, what do propose I should have done? There is no choice in this country. Republican, Democrat, it's a big joke. How can you have lived in this country as long as you have and not see that? I want welfare gone too. I want government out of my life. Anywhere in history after the 1960's it didn't matter who was in office it all still exists. One president in this country tried to tell the truth and his head was exploded all over his car and wife. The sad part is that people inside themselves know the truth but they continue on like it's business as usual for Uncle Sam. What does the fact of owning land have to do with anything? Seriously? Many of us own land, cars, boats, ect... Why is that important? Nothing you say will change anything. If it's true that you want to this to end, if you want all this social welfare to be but a memory than it's time to speak quietly. The method of brunt force is not working anymore. Ive been on GLP for a long time. I like to vent here and it's a awesome place to see what our future holds but it could be an awesome place to make real change if people like you make it happen. You stand out for a reason. It's not because of your words it's because of who you are. What you call a landowner and what I call a landowner are probably two different things... A true land owner owns his deed free and clear...any welfare rat can borrow money and declare himself a landowner. Welfare recipients should not be allowed to vote, it's a conflict of interest. It has to crash now, there's no way to recover the mess. There's a big difference between a non-land owner and a welfare recipient Brief. Just saying. I'm tired of waiting, somebody push the damn button already! Keep your 72 virgins, give me one old biker chick. |
guncontrolltard2 User ID: 31003984 United States 12/28/2012 11:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Romney knows how to run a successful business, the negro doesn't have a clue...but we let the children vote in Santa... Quoting: BRIEF i dont get it either brief, when you look at america from the outside,you guys look like retards, assholes ,idiots crooks con men cocksuckers, i could go on and on, but what we really want to know is why you let it continue, we guess its cause americans are cowards and have no real purpose other than to be the worlds biggest population of douche bag losers,,, whay you say? the land of the free! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/29/2012 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The guy on the video is wrong. The gold standard went out in 1964, and people were given till 1968 to get rid of the dollars (to the bank) and trade them in for Fed Reserve Notes at the time. That can be looked up at the Wikipedia. And of course I remember that because I guess I am old. The current system is based on what the Country can earn in the future. It's a paper world, but of course if the world is wiped out then........................it was only paper if it even exists after that and it probably won't. On the other hand, gold would still exist so the new method was and is thought to be better. If you have to pay back in gold if a lot fails, then you better have that backing to do that. There is not enough gold in the world to do that though. And it would be worse to have to pay back in gold. That is where Ron Paul is just plain wrong then. That would make matter worse not better. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30600228 United States 12/29/2012 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wow, OP, I'm amazed to see truth like that on TV in the U.S. I wonder if that's a sign of the global awakening of consciousness I believe is occurring. I certainly hope so. 5 stars from me. This should be pinned! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31052540 Me too....that was a strong piece. In fact if I were her I'd be very concerned for my job right about now. Or is it just more "awareness" hype from the puppet masters to prompt people into action? A deliberate plan demands conclusion.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/29/2012 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8397139 United States 12/29/2012 12:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The guy on the video is wrong. The gold standard went out in 1964, and people were given till 1968 to get rid of the dollars (to the bank) and trade them in for Fed Reserve Notes at the time. That can be looked up at the Wikipedia. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27794780 And of course I remember that because I guess I am old. The current system is based on what the Country can earn in the future. It's a paper world, but of course if the world is wiped out then........................it was only paper if it even exists after that and it probably won't. On the other hand, gold would still exist so the new method was and is thought to be better. If you have to pay back in gold if a lot fails, then you better have that backing to do that. There is not enough gold in the world to do that though. And it would be worse to have to pay back in gold. That is where Ron Paul is just plain wrong then. That would make matter worse not better. "Starting under the administration of the French President Charles de Gaulle and continuing until 1970, France reduced its dollar reserves, trading them for gold from the U.S. government, thereby reducing U.S. economic influence abroad. This, along with the fiscal strain of federal expenditures for the Vietnam War and persistent balance of payments deficits, led President Richard Nixon to end the direct convertibility of the dollar to gold on August 15, 1971, resulting in the system's breakdown (the "Nixon Shock")." [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/29/2012 12:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That is the way that it was explained back then, and of course being a Leader in the World, then future potential is what drives the paper market. Misusing it then is a point left to someone else to ponder and consider. But for goods bought in the USA, the Fed Reserve Note will still apply no matter what happens. |
The Mechanic User ID: 30953029 United States 12/29/2012 12:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/29/2012 12:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to en.wikipedia.org] In March 1968, the effort to control the private market price of gold was abandoned. For the paper dollar of the USA, it was 1968 that the paper dollar was not backed by gold anymore. Who cares what France was doing although it may have taken foreign Nations that long like the video stated then. (I did not actually find the link for the dollar yet at Wikipedia, but what I stated was what happened here in the USA. Started in 1964, ended in 1968. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/29/2012 12:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Free-Us-Now User ID: 28986686 United States 12/29/2012 12:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/29/2012 12:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Before you would get a paper dollar and on it was stated that it was backed by gold. Fed Reserve Notes (the paper nowadays since that time) do not state that at any time, so all paper dollars that stated that they were backed by gold, were gone, and had to be by 1968. That was law. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17584550 United States 12/29/2012 12:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20901334 United States 12/29/2012 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Land owner? Please, if you truly owned land, there would be no reason to pay the real owner TAXES on it. How the hell can anyone pay TAX to another for something OWNED? The stupidity and programming of the DEBT system in the US never ceases to stagger me. YOU CANNOT TAX SOMETHING THAT IS NOT YOURS. The OWNER receives TAX on property, the OWNER does NOT PAY tax on owned property. I defy anyone to prove that FACT incorrect. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8397139 United States 12/29/2012 12:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to en.wikipedia.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27794780 In March 1968, the effort to control the private market price of gold was abandoned. For the paper dollar of the USA, it was 1968 that the paper dollar was not backed by gold anymore. Who cares what France was doing although it may have taken foreign Nations that long like the video stated then. (I did not actually find the link for the dollar yet at Wikipedia, but what I stated was what happened here in the USA. Started in 1964, ended in 1968. Oh, I see! Thanks! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6430811 Germany 12/29/2012 12:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 1506618 United States 12/29/2012 12:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Only an idiot believes the president has any power or effect. Congress is told what to do and given the proper motivation to do so (which includes bribery, blackmail, and outright threats which are implied to them before they are put into position) and the president signs the bill. In many cases the Executive branch writes law that the Federal reserve dictates to him (which is the reason the president was given the power to write executive orders) and the judicial branch completely ignores it's limitations and 'interprets' laws any way that suits the banksters, which is in contradiction to the balance of governmental power built into the constitution. The bottom line is the federal reserve is an international corporation of globalist bankers and has control of our nation's government because it is the hand that feeds it. Germany had the same situation after World war 1 and soon after Hitler nationalized the currency and put it under the control of the nations government, the country enjoyed an immediate prosperity envied throughout the world, and it's government was able to make great strides in technology and infrastructure. The parasites were simply removed, which were doing the same thing to Germany they are to this nation, sucking as much blood as they can.. . The President is the defacto CEO of that corporation and does pretty much what the international banksters tell him to. For those of you who are not aware, the secret Service has two jobs, and if you think about it, these two jobs reveal the truth. One of their jobs is to protect the currency of the Federal reserve from counterfeiters (the Federal Reserve IS NOT a government agency, it is a private international corporation) and the other is to protect the President, or kill him in it becomes necessarily as in the case of Kennedy. The presidency is a figurehead position meant to fool the people, the actual CEO of the corporation is the CEO of the federal reserve. Think about it, when Kennedy was killed he was trying to do away with the federal reserve and the secret service works for them. That is why they put him in an open car in the crossfire of at least three snipers in a city where he was known to be extremely unpopular. This way the facts could be muddled forever and we would never know the truth, which is the secret service arranged for a situation that would most certainly lead to the president's death. The kill shot came from a street drain from the front, BTW, and was the second shot that shot him from the same direction, almost directly ahead of him.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20901334 United States 12/29/2012 12:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Before you would get a paper dollar and on it was stated that it was backed by gold. Fed Reserve Notes (the paper nowadays since that time) do not state that at any time, so all paper dollars that stated that they were backed by gold, were gone, and had to be by 1968. That was law. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27794780 Uh, not true at all, there are about 300 million gold backed dollars in the US economy. It is reported yearly in the Treasury accounting report. Just because you do not know how to access them does not mean they are not out there for use. I use them every day. By the way US Coins are not Federal Reserve DEBT, either and in fact, are lawful money. |
mikedoall User ID: 26706438 United States 12/29/2012 12:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/29/2012 12:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Production of one-dollar Federal Reserve Notes was undertaken in late 1963 to replace the soon-to-be obsolete $1 Silver Certificate. The design on the reverse remained the same, but the border design on the obverse underwent considerable modification, as the mostly abstract filigrees were replaced with designs that were mostly botanical in nature. In addition, the word "one", which had appeared eight times around the border, in small type, was eliminated. The serial numbers and treasury seal were printed in green ink. This was the first time the one-dollar bill was printed as a Federal Reserve Note. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Unless it was silver, but I really thought though that it was also the gold standard. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11391214 United States 12/29/2012 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30493690 Australia 12/29/2012 12:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30000551 United States 12/29/2012 12:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8397139 United States 12/29/2012 12:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/29/2012 12:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 1506618 United States 12/29/2012 12:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Land owner? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20901334 Please, if you truly owned land, there would be no reason to pay the real owner TAXES on it. How the hell can anyone pay TAX to another for something OWNED? The stupidity and programming of the DEBT system in the US never ceases to stagger me. YOU CANNOT TAX SOMETHING THAT IS NOT YOURS. The OWNER receives TAX on property, the OWNER does NOT PAY tax on owned property. I defy anyone to prove that FACT incorrect. Damned good point. My property is completely paid for in full and I hold deed that states I own it (with my name in all capital letters of course), but if I don't pay taxes on it the government auctions it off to the highest bidder. This "tax" can realistically be seen as rent, so how can I have to pay rent on property I already own? With all of the other taxes levied on the american citizen, it cannot be justified as a necessity to provide funding for infrastructure as is claimed, and in any case it is extortion to force someone to pay tribute on that which they hold clear title of ownership to. This is the same thing as income tax, which has no law supporting it's implementation. This is just one of many examples of the government acting as enforcer for a corporation in return for monetary compensation, and is completely illegal. I have characterized this globalist cabal as an international crime syndicate, and that is exactly what it is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31052540 Argentina 12/29/2012 12:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I live in Spokane, this wasn't actually aired on KHQ nightly news, this is internet content only. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30000551 Thanks for clarifying that. I jumped the gun there, assuming it had actually been broadcast. Hopefully that's the next step -- broadcasting truth like that so the sheeple can at least hear it and start to think. |
Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 1506618 United States 12/29/2012 12:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I live in Spokane, this wasn't actually aired on KHQ nightly news, this is internet content only. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30000551 Thanks for clarifying that. I jumped the gun there, assuming it had actually been broadcast. Hopefully that's the next step -- broadcasting truth like that so the sheeple can at least hear it and start to think. I know many people (including the President himself), believed the following speech was being broadcast tot he American people, but the truth is it was never broadcast and never even known about until the 90's. Kennedy was told he was going to be going live, otherwise he would not have started the speech the way he did. Of course the Jewish media which was controlled by the banksters would never have aired this speech: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31052540 Argentina 12/29/2012 12:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The guy on the video is wrong. The gold standard went out in 1964, and people were given till 1968 to get rid of the dollars (to the bank) and trade them in for Fed Reserve Notes at the time. That can be looked up at the Wikipedia. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27794780 And of course I remember that because I guess I am old. The current system is based on what the Country can earn in the future. It's a paper world, but of course if the world is wiped out then........................it was only paper if it even exists after that and it probably won't. On the other hand, gold would still exist so the new method was and is thought to be better. If you have to pay back in gold if a lot fails, then you better have that backing to do that. There is not enough gold in the world to do that though. And it would be worse to have to pay back in gold. That is where Ron Paul is just plain wrong then. That would make matter worse not better. As another poster stated, Nixon was forced to finally close the gold window (the convertibility of the U.S. dollar into gold as a means to settle U.S. debt with foreign nations) in 1971, but of course you're correct that the process was set into motion prior to that. As to your point about Ron Paul being wrong, since "there isn't enough gold", that is the most common misconception about the inevitable return to the gold standard. Of course there isn't enough gold at gold's current price, but gold was and still is the final arbiter of monetary value, since it's the best money that has ever existed on this planet (Aristotle first defined the 5 characteristics of what makes something money, and gold is the best fit, with silver being a close second). Because the system has become so bastardized, so far removed from what a true and just monetary system should be and how it should function, the price of gold will necessarily have to rise, and rise enormously, for gold to be able to reenter the monetary system again. But that is inevitable. The process has been in motion for quite some time, hence the powerful bull market for gold, which, contrary to the bullshit Goldman Sachs fed the sheeple recently, is alive and well. Gold, as priced in any fiat currency you care to name, is still extremely cheap, which means we have a ways to go yet, unfortunately, until it replaces all the bullshit paper we've all become accustomed to using as money. But it can and it will. And we'll all be a lot better off when it does. |