BREAKING: Neil DeGrasse Tyson Planetary Alignment [Video]

yes yes yes...bingo
i will see you in the new age buddy
let the seromonies begin tonight

DECEMBER 29 2012

see ya there

Forget about alignments, conjunctions is where it is at-

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Don't worry. The recent Venus transit will bring us doom before long...

Neil Degrasse Tyson is the man. Thanks OP

Both these quotes are by the same famous person and are relevant .

1....Facts are meaningless - you could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!

2....Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything. 14% of people know that.

Homer J Simpson

good vid,Dapurps!!

LOL

Don't look up there!...what are you doing, silly monkey
we've made all these great things to keep you occupied...
why are you looking at the star?!?!
those are pin pricks of light in the incomprehensible mass that is the universe.

Don't look at that! My goodness, you might miss something important in the local news or something....

"not even special" haha ouch!

That was funny...

Today at noon central is pretty cool.The Sun will have all the planets in a line with Pluto on the east side and Mercury on the west side.
The only planet not in the daytime sky is Jupiter Who is very close to the full moon on the opposite hemishere.

Check it out...
[link to www.skyviewcafe.com]

You forgot this.

Did he say anything that isn't true?


Only the dumb ones.

The smart ones know that "rare alignments" are meaningless.


So?


No.

The vast majority of astronomers working for NASA is an "alternative thinkers" meme.
And, as usual, not based on any facts.


Some heads require regular applications of clue-by-fours.
Stupid ideas deserve to be mocked.

Still shootin' dope?

in the materialistic and scientific spectrum yes. But astrologically speaking...well I am of the mind that the stars and planets effect our paths.

And for good reason.

Looks like i made it a little too obvious on here.

Ah yes! The guy that preaches faithless science - his religion. Everything was put in the heavens for signs and for seasons. They are used to tell the greatest story ever told. And they are used as markers in time.

He only discusses alignments in a vacuum. He does not discuss the significance of the alignments as it relates to prophecy. So he is right and wrong at the same time.

A godless man - an antichrist - a bastard.

I envy your innocence.

Richard Hoaxland has been the very opposite of quiet the past 10 years. he's only managed to expose himself for the fraud he is due to his 19.5 degrees this, hypertorsion physics, and making every rare event meet Neils very description of whom to be wary of.

Hoaxland has no credibility at this point. The the last year alone has been nothing but straight up Bullshit and him craw fishing out of his own predictions.

The only thing he has on his site at this point, he got from Neil Armstrong, and that's about Phobos being a hollow manufactured satellite and that it needs to be further investigated due to the fact that it may provide very interesting info.

Phobos was in the news just recently after the EU Space agency reported that Phobos was hollow based on various radar readings..

What is this fuckery?! When did "not rare" end up meaning "insignificant"? When did "happens often" end up meaning "don't pay any attention to it"? Who the hell is he to decide what matters? All these idiots do is speak half truths(when not ignoring us or lying to us outright) and/or mock us. We live in an Electric Universe and EVERYTHING effects EVERYTHING ELSE. This shit talking fop-sweat knows this, he's not nearly as stupid or obtuse as he pretends to be. He is a semi entertaining mouthpiece for the Elites though, if you take him as such, I'll give him that much.

Actually, he didn't say that common things are insignificant. What he said was that many "rare" occurrences are about as significant as each other. Just because something only happens every so many thousands of years doesn't mean it's of any more value to our existence than other events of similar notoriety. A square is always a rectangle but not all rectangles are squares.

Try to stop looking for things to be mad about all the time. You'll enjoy life much more.

I just watched his video about UFO's.

He is saying that the common people see something flashing in the sky, and it is something we have never seen before and we yell, "UFO!! It must be aliens!".. then he says that we are drawing conclusions naming something that is unidentified.

Ok, that may be true. Then he goes on to say that to be a scientist, they are always ignorant and have to research to identify "things".. Always at the drawing board.

Ok, I get that.

So, my beef is, if us common "non-scientist" people search, and research, and make discoveries, just like the "scientists" do, why are we shot down? why are we still told by the "scientific community with a PhD on the wall", that we are wrong?

Oh yeah, because we are just common folk and need to shut up and let them do their job.. Stay stupid folks.

Because most scientist have an ego of "all knowing"

But Neil is awesome. He's not perfect but he's smart.

I think there are two parts to an answer for that...

First, speaking generally about for the "scientific community", who would you trust more to fix your car - an auto mechanic or a dentist? A dentist may happen to know about cars but dollar for dollar, I would imagine you would take your vehicle to someone with a specialty in the particular craft.

Secondly, in regards specifically to Dr. Tyson, he mentions in some interview that if his most respected colleagues claimed to see a UFO, he would ask for evidence. He goes on to make an interesting point about perception and how eye witness accounts are not redeemable as solid facts, yet we have a justice system that revolves around convicting murderers based on the same type of testimony.

I think the reason Neil is incredibly popular and to many of us "common folk", credible, is that he does have a rational method to understanding science. He tends to explain things with a logical approach to parallel a point that he constantly reiterates - he would rather you doubt him and go do your own research than to simply take him at his word.

Neil is charismatic and passionate about what he does.

Having said that, he is still a shill.

Can you elaborate as to why you think that?

"You" usually are.

Citizen scientists have the same burden of evidence as professionals.

What scientists (metaphorically speaking) do with new ideas is load them in a canon and shoot them at the wall of reality.
Then they study the pieces.
Very few new ideas survive first contact with the real world.
The life of a scientist means having your ideas disproven 99% of the time.

It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. — Richard Feynman