Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,199 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 300,631
Pageviews Today: 490,439Threads Today: 138Posts Today: 2,472
05:17 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Abraham Lincoln was a Tyrant
Poster Handle Requiemdream (Ghost)
Post Content
The re-write of Lincoln's legacy has been stunning indeed. He was never an abolishionist, in fact he was a open racist, but he was losing support in the North for his scorched Earth war against the South, and the only large block of support he could find for continuing the war was the Northern Abolishionists.

His own Congress would not pass the emancipation proclamation, so in exchange for abolishionist support he went ahead and issued the emancipation proclamation as an executive order in the middle of the war, illegally I might add,.

Slavery was indeed a terrible injustice, but it was already on its way out in Western Civilization when the Civil War occurred. Revisionist historians latched onto slavery as the root cause of the Civil War, but in fact it was merely an afterthought and a desperate attempt to shore up waning support for that awful war....

And the United States has never been the same country since...

There have been several defining moments that have tested the United States resolve to maintain the true ideals of our forefathers, 9/11/2001, The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the U.S. Civil War have been three of the biggest, and also biggest failures...

It's time to admit the United States that most people think they live in is gone, the only reason we think it's still here is because the T.V. Tells Americans how free they are every single day. Until we can admit that the ideals of our forefathers have been hoplessly corrupted, there will be no fixing this...
 Quoting: Saddletramp


You don't know what the term scorched earth means.

Lincoln was a bit of a racist, and quite frankly it worked out well that a embittered southerner assassinated him, that way we had the slaves freed and no deportations of newly freed black Americans.

The Civil War was 100% fought because of slavery. It was fought because the US was expanding West, and the South wanted the slavery to spread there. The North was against this notion.

When the abolitionist Abraham Lincoln was elected president, the South Carolina began succession and six more states followed. A month later in February, when the Union refused to give up military installation to the newly formed Confederate government on confederate lands, the Confederacy attacked, and the civil war began.

All cause over slavery. Period.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6411376


oh man! There is so much wrong in that paragraph I don't know where to start! Holy crap! If you think the righteous citizens (at least the majority) of the north would send their sons, husbands & fathers the fight to free slaves - LOL! NO. MOST fought to preserve the union. MANY were conscripts from other countries like Germany & Ireland. Most of the TRUE history which, as we know, is written by THE VICTORS, has been buried by our government. However, as was posted earlier in this thread, this link in the UK [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] is a great detail of what was really going on. Things are never straight forward in government - even in history. There are always ulterior motives. nd even as black soldiers were dying for the Union cause and a mission to send 453 freed slaves to colonise a pest-ridden island off Haiti met with a disastrous small pox outbreak, Mr Lincoln was secretly authorising British officials to recruit what could have been hundreds of thousands of blacks for a new life on the sugar and cotton plantations of Central America.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP