You are really stretching to call these things "lies..."
None of the things you list are inconsistent, unless you put an absurd spin on them.
Someone who arrives 20 minutes after a shooting is "one of the first on the scene..." The pictures she took are proof that she got there while it was still unfolding.
The mention that she is "stationed" at the fire house does not mean she was there at the time... It means it's her assigned place of work.
The fact that she took pictures outside the car doesn't affect the fact that she took pictures earlier in the car.
also - the "timestamp" on the webpage is meaningless unless you know what time zone both the receiving and sending computers are set to. I routinely get email messages that are several hours off in their time due to that. Check it out.
If it was a conspiracy wouldn't it be simpler to put out a consistent story?
Sifting the trivia and turning everything into a conspiracy cheapens true conspiracies, and makes it all a joke. Do better or do something else with your time.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 519793 I was initially so saddened by this event that I was crying -- which I'm not inclined to do. So it makes me rather upset to learn that there are SO MANY inconsistencies without any clarification all over the place -- when everyone has a changing story and the facts are mercurial, I wisen up. I don't like being tricked
So, one thing that bugs me is why hell didn't that Rosen guy (who "helped" the children) call POLICE or get help from firefighters (He's next door to the firehouse) when distraught children show up on his lawn? Obviously, this editor was so unbusy that she went right back to work in her OFFICE (and even if she was doing duty at the paper - you'd think they'd want her ON THE SCENE gathering INFORMATION)
But back to ROSEN - Would you take in a bunch of distraught children INTO YOUR HOUSE and give them STUFFED ANIMALS to "play" with without alerting authorities? And he refers to how he was ESPECIALLY sad...and HOPING IT WASN'T THIS SPECIFIC TEACHER -- to find out that their teacher was "That pretty 27 year old teacher, Victoria Soto" ...sorry, was he stalking her? How does he know her age? If he DID know her, he'd certainly mention that important detail (and does not)...No, he refers to the teacher in a way that reads like a character description from a SCRIPT. I studied a little movie script writing and that precisely how you would insert a succinnt, initial character description into a movie script..."A PRETTY 27 YEAR OLD TEACHER, VICTORIA SOTO"
So, either these are LIES or this town has some serious, deep rooted rampant problems with professionalism and priorities.
