Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,982 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,051,991
Pageviews Today: 1,759,903Threads Today: 717Posts Today: 11,919
06:02 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15302140
United States
12/31/2012 02:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Shannon Hicks is the Associate Editor for The Newtown Bee in Connecticut and ALSO a Volunteer Firefighter for Sandy Hook.

She is the person who took that very well known photo of children being led single file out of "danger" by police.

I'm going to expose her LIES and TWO versions of her story, as well as my own view point that, when I explain it, will have you question this person for sure.

I will also mention a very suspicious production company further on as well. Read carefully, you'll enjoy my findings.

First I will quote an article published Dec. 15, 2012 2:54 pm

"Newtown Bee Associate Editor Shannon Hicks was at the newspaper’s offices about a mile and a quarter from Sandy Hook Elementary when she heard about a possible shooting at the school.

Hicks, a volunteer firefighter for the last three and a half years, heard the news through the police scanner, she said by phone Saturday night.

Hicks was one of the first people at the scene of the shooting, which left 20 children and seven adults dead, including the shooter. She was “behind the first dozen police officers,” said John Voket, also an associate editor at the paper, noting that the firehouse where Hicks is stationed shares a driveway with the school.

When Hicks got in the driveway, she started taking photographs immediately through the windshield of her car, with one hand on the steering wheel and one holding her camera, Voket said."

[link to www.poynter.org]

Ok, so her first story has her taking photos with one hand on the wheel and a camera in the other.

Now, before I show her other version of events, I want to point out that she is also supposed to be a volunteer firefighter and claims to have been listening in on the police scanner and heard about a possible shooting on the radio. And if you read the above story again, you'll notice TWO lies in that story alone.

Read what this "John Voket" person says again, noting that Shannon Hicks claims she was at the offices of the newspaper when the events started.

For comparison: "Newtown Bee Associate Editor Shannon Hicks was at the newspaper’s offices about a mile and a quarter from Sandy Hook Elementary"

Contradicting statement by John Voket: Hicks was one of the first people at the scene of the shooting, which left 20 children and seven adults dead, including the shooter. She was “behind the first dozen police officers,” said John Voket, also an associate editor at the paper, noting that the firehouse where Hicks is stationed shares a driveway with the school.

John Voket says that Shannon Hicks was one of the first people there AND that she was stationed at the Firehouse, not the offices of the newspaper listening to the police scanner as she claims.

I'm going to move on to her other version of events after asking you all a question.

If you were an editor of a newspaper AND a volunteer firefighter, don't you think that after hearing about a shooting at a school on a police scanner you would assume your roll as a firefighter to go and help INSTEAD OF going to the scene to be a "reporter"? I thought so.

Now, here is her version from TIME published 12/20/2012 and she even puts timestamps on this version:

"9:59 last Friday morning, Shannon Hicks pulled her 2006 Jeep Wrangler off the road just outside Sandy Hook Elementary school." (Note that she has claimed she was one of the first on scene and that police audio has 9:35 AM as the start time of incidents.)

“Parents just started yelling their children’s names,” remembers Hicks, careful to grab her camera off the passenger seat as she climbed out of her vehicle and into the chaos of the scene."

Oh really? I thought you took pictures from the side of the road with one hand on the wheel.


"At 10:09 am, 10 minutes after she climbed out of her vehicle, she snapped the shutter on an elementary school class being led out of the school by two Connecticut State Police officers."

[link to lightbox.time.com]

Is Shannon Hicks a liar? And why is this John Voket person contradicting himself? Busted.

One more question.

Why did this "Pass The Hat Productions" company, who only has a Facebook page, start a Fundraiser for the victims of Sandy Hook at 10:35 AM on 12/14/2012, only one hour after the police calls came in.

Here is a link to their page and if you look at their post from 12/14/2012 is is timestamped for proof. Is that not a little early to start fundraising?

[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]

What do you think?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1968384
United States
12/31/2012 03:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Why do you people keep interpreting journalistic fuckups/inconsistencies as an "inside job"...?

You'd be very good copy editors but as journalists you prove nothing.

Why not say something SPECIFIC for once? Like:

So Time magazine gives (very slightly) different details of her initial actions that day from a local newspaper. And you believe her showing up as a "reporter" is fishy because (in your opinion) she should have shown up as a "volunteer fire fighter" (where was the "fire" she was supposed to be "fighting" btw...?).

Fine.

So are you saying this lady's "in on it"...?

How, exactly? Specifically, what was her "role"...?

(also it's entirely possible she took the initial photographs immediately with "one hand on the wheel", then put the camera down, drove up farther or onto the side of the road to park, THEN grabbed the camera off the seat before getting out, as written in Time)

(just because Time doesn't give the EXACT details other sources did doesn't mean they contradict each other ffs...)
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 15302140
United States
12/31/2012 03:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
I'm not saying she is in on anything, I'm just pointing out some lies and false reports. I feel that her story is a bit weird to say the least.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9258462
United States
12/31/2012 03:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
This thing became a fundraising extravaganza while the blood was still wet? I wonder if any big banks were sponsors?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 15302140
United States
12/31/2012 03:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
MANY banks. Too many to list. This whole thing stunk to me the first second I heard it. I posted this here because if I put this on another site (you know the one) it will get deleted
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 15302140
United States
12/31/2012 03:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Also, if you look at the photograph you will notice the child in front and one of the adults in back are holding some papers of some sort. If you were evacuating a school, would you not drop everything you're doing - including homework or paper- to evacuate? Could they be drill instructions?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 15302140
United States
12/31/2012 03:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Lies and coverup: “I literally put on my firefighter gear,” she said. “I was there as a firefighter probably for not even more than 20 minutes before my editor said he wanted me back in the office to work with him to coordinate coverage from there.”
MzGA

User ID: 30868363
United States
12/31/2012 04:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
These people ugh, but people do believe it so... Just wanted to add that the picture that was shown of the kids looking so distraught coming out of the building was proven to a picture from a November drill where they asked the kids to close their eyes as they left the building . Wth? That's one way to get those expressions. Is there not a single person in the Ct area that will speak out risk be damned ? They have already raised 3 million according to the local paper The Patch.



Lies and coverup: “I literally put on my firefighter gear,” she said. “I was there as a firefighter probably for not even more than 20 minutes before my editor said he wanted me back in the office to work with him to coordinate coverage from there.”
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15302140
Anonymouse71

User ID: 847677
Sweden
12/31/2012 05:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Hi all, I believe that all the money raised, lawsuits and insurance claims will be massive. This will be the families 'pay-off'.
Anonymouse
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31204052
Australia
12/31/2012 06:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Facebook post is gone..
I did find something weird on Facebook.. The email or Parker fund was set up by Robbin Parkersburg best friend..
He works for Ernst andvyoung the sane company Adam Lanza father works for.. Hmmm
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31204052
Australia
12/31/2012 06:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Facebook post is gone..
I did find something weird on Facebook.. The email or Parker fund was set up by Robbin Parkersburg best friend..
He works for Ernst andvyoung the sane company Adam Lanza father works for.. Hmmm
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31204052


Geez my I pad doesn't like me today.. The emilie Parker fund was set up by robbie Parkers best best friend and he works for Ernst and young.. Adam Lanzas fathers employer..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31204979
Portugal
12/31/2012 06:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
These people ugh, but people do believe it so... Just wanted to add that the picture that was shown of the kids looking so distraught coming out of the building was proven to a picture from a November drill where they asked the kids to close their eyes as they left the building . Wth? That's one way to get those expressions. Is there not a single person in the Ct area that will speak out risk be damned ? They have already raised 3 million according to the local paper The Patch.

 Quoting: MzGA


proven to a picture from a November drill - Do you have a source please?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11360402
United States
12/31/2012 06:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
bsflag..Fucking Moronic Bulllshit!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31199936
United States
12/31/2012 07:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Editing and fact checking are apparently dead arts. However, these articles have some weirdnesses.

Why would anyone care what sort of car this woman drives? Why did two different articles mention specific vehicles that are absolutely nothing alike? That is very... I don't know that it is suspicious per se, but it's just downright odd. If I am reading such a story IDGAF if some small town reporter skidded up in a VW or a Jeep Wrangler.

Then there are just too many weird details that don't match that don't even really matter. Like was she driving and snapping photos? Did she jump out of her car and take photos? If I don't know, I'll just write she took photos and move along with my story especially if it's an early story (as in breaking news).

Then we progress to did she tromp into the crime scene snapping away on the heels of police? Was she at the paper's office a mile and a quarter away or was she dressing up in her fireman's gear?

I mean, if no one has any sort of accurate idea what she was doing why should we even care? If some silly reporter's hijinks are all they have to talk about then there's no story (yet). But, maybe the whole point is to just report half the stories in such a haphazard, unprofessional manner that reading them is frustrating. Needless to say, TV tends to be even worse most of the time.

As far as the photo, if HER PAPER miscaptioned the original photo that they knew had been taken some time previously, they should be ashamed. If they didn't and other news outlets made assumptions that the photo was taken as the story unfolded, then that is typical sloppy reporting.

As for fundraising, weren't these mostly rich people? I'm not being mean. I am always very upset and sad to see horrible things happen. But, this is what I keep hearing.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19396116
United States
12/31/2012 07:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Be sure to gather metadata from photos. Information such as time the photo was taken to GPS coordinates can be obtained from photos. Here is a tool for doing that.

[link to www.jpeg-scrubber.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19396116
United States
12/31/2012 07:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Here is how someone can strip metadata from photos who have photoshop.

[link to askville.amazon.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 519793
United States
12/31/2012 11:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
You are really stretching to call these things "lies..."

None of the things you list are inconsistent, unless you put an absurd spin on them.

Someone who arrives 20 minutes after a shooting is "one of the first on the scene..." The pictures she took are proof that she got there while it was still unfolding.

The mention that she is "stationed" at the fire house does not mean she was there at the time... It means it's her assigned place of work.

The fact that she took pictures outside the car doesn't affect the fact that she took pictures earlier in the car.

also - the "timestamp" on the webpage is meaningless unless you know what time zone both the receiving and sending computers are set to. I routinely get email messages that are several hours off in their time due to that. Check it out.

If it was a conspiracy wouldn't it be simpler to put out a consistent story?

Sifting the trivia and turning everything into a conspiracy cheapens true conspiracies, and makes it all a joke. Do better or do something else with your time.
13th-Century

User ID: 31055867
Canada
12/31/2012 11:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
These people ugh, but people do believe it so... Just wanted to add that the picture that was shown of the kids looking so distraught coming out of the building was proven to a picture from a November drill where they asked the kids to close their eyes as they left the building . Wth? That's one way to get those expressions. Is there not a single person in the Ct area that will speak out risk be damned ? They have already raised 3 million according to the local paper The Patch.

 Quoting: MzGA


proven to a picture from a November drill - Do you have a source please?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31204979


From London, England, The Daily Mail, with the headline:

Murdered principal's haunting pictures of Sandy Hook children practicing their evacuation drill - just days before massacre

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

NOW - even though the famous photograph we have all seen of the children in a line does not appear in this Daily Mail article (it may have been removed, for obvious reasons), the fact is that the information that the famous photo is indeed from a drill needs to be tracked down.

I actually read - somewhere?!?!?!?!? - that the famous photo was from a year ago, November 2011.
13th-Century

User ID: 31055867
Canada
12/31/2012 11:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Found this:

A highly circulated photo depicts students walking in a single file formation with their hands on each others’ shoulders and eyes shut. Yet this was the image of a drill that took place prior to the event itself. Most other photos are portraits of individual children. Despite aerial video footage of the event documenting law enforcement scouring the scene and apprehending one or more suspects in the wooded area nearby the school,[11] there is no such evidence that a mass exodus of children from the school transpired once law enforcement pronounced Sandy Hook secure. Nor are there videos or photos of several hundred students and their parents at the oft-referenced fire station nearby where students were routed for parent pick up.


[link to www.globalresearch.ca]

Note: Global Research is a highly respected alternative news source in Ottawa, Canada.

The author of this article is Professor James F. Tracy, and here is his bio:

About the author:
An Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University, James Tracy's work on media history, politics and culture has appeared in a wide variety of academic journals, edited volumes, and alternative news and opinion outlets. Tracy is editor of Union for Democratic Communication’s journal Democratic Communiqué and a contributor to Project Censored’s forthcoming publication Censored 2013: The Top Censored Stories and Media Analysis of 2011-2012. Additional writings and information are accessible at memoryholeblog.com.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28837935
United States
12/31/2012 11:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
These people ugh, but people do believe it so... Just wanted to add that the picture that was shown of the kids looking so distraught coming out of the building was proven to a picture from a November drill where they asked the kids to close their eyes as they left the building . Wth? That's one way to get those expressions. Is there not a single person in the Ct area that will speak out risk be damned ? They have already raised 3 million according to the local paper The Patch.



Lies and coverup: “I literally put on my firefighter gear,” she said. “I was there as a firefighter probably for not even more than 20 minutes before my editor said he wanted me back in the office to work with him to coordinate coverage from there.”
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15302140

 Quoting: MzGA



Okay that quotation is VERY strange....if this women is a firefighter, her and her editor should have some agreement that in case of an emergency (and this was a HUGE emergency), that her job as a firefighter would come first. Why is she even taking calls from her editor when she's supposedly working on a huge emergency? Makes no sense. These are lies or these people have some serious troubles with professionalism.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25739945
United States
12/31/2012 11:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Good work, Oppie!

And....

A 600 child evacuation would be quite a sight....

With a thousand emotional parents greeting them....

No such images exist!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25739945
United States
12/31/2012 11:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Good work, Oppie!

And....

A 600 child evacuation would be quite a sight....

With a thousand emotional parents greeting them....

No such images exist!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28837935
United States
12/31/2012 11:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
You are really stretching to call these things "lies..."

None of the things you list are inconsistent, unless you put an absurd spin on them.

Someone who arrives 20 minutes after a shooting is "one of the first on the scene..." The pictures she took are proof that she got there while it was still unfolding.

The mention that she is "stationed" at the fire house does not mean she was there at the time... It means it's her assigned place of work.

The fact that she took pictures outside the car doesn't affect the fact that she took pictures earlier in the car.

also - the "timestamp" on the webpage is meaningless unless you know what time zone both the receiving and sending computers are set to. I routinely get email messages that are several hours off in their time due to that. Check it out.

If it was a conspiracy wouldn't it be simpler to put out a consistent story?

Sifting the trivia and turning everything into a conspiracy cheapens true conspiracies, and makes it all a joke. Do better or do something else with your time.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 519793



I was initially so saddened by this event that I was crying -- which I'm not inclined to do. So it makes me rather upset to learn that there are SO MANY inconsistencies without any clarification all over the place -- when everyone has a changing story and the facts are mercurial, I wisen up. I don't like being tricked

So, one thing that bugs me is why hell didn't that Rosen guy (who "helped" the children) call POLICE or get help from firefighters (He's next door to the firehouse) when distraught children show up on his lawn? Obviously, this editor was so unbusy that she went right back to work in her OFFICE (and even if she was doing duty at the paper - you'd think they'd want her ON THE SCENE gathering INFORMATION)

But back to ROSEN - Would you take in a bunch of distraught children INTO YOUR HOUSE and give them STUFFED ANIMALS to "play" with without alerting authorities? And he refers to how he was ESPECIALLY sad...and HOPING IT WASN'T THIS SPECIFIC TEACHER -- to find out that their teacher was "That pretty 27 year old teacher, Victoria Soto" ...sorry, was he stalking her? How does he know her age? If he DID know her, he'd certainly mention that important detail (and does not)...No, he refers to the teacher in a way that reads like a character description from a SCRIPT. I studied a little movie script writing and that precisely how you would insert a succinnt, initial character description into a movie script..."A PRETTY 27 YEAR OLD TEACHER, VICTORIA SOTO"

So, either these are LIES or this town has some serious, deep rooted rampant problems with professionalism and priorities.
13th-Century

User ID: 31055867
Canada
12/31/2012 12:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Sandy Hook Kids


Is the little girl in the blue top really crying, or is she laughing or sounding off about something?

We think we 'see' what we are expected to see.

The little girl in the pink pants and the pink sneakers, further back, looks as if she is smiling and having a good time.

I repeat:

WE KNOW NOW THIS IS A PHOTO FROM A DRILL AT THE SCHOOL IN NOVEMBER... What year, I'm not sure.

Maybe November 2012.

Maybe November 2011.

Remember this:

SOMEBODY checked the principal's tweets after the December 14, 2012 event, they saw this photo, and they decided to spread it all over the media, pretending it was the evacuation of kids from Sandy Hook Elementary on the day of the shootings.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28837935
United States
12/31/2012 12:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Good work, Oppie!

And....

A 600 child evacuation would be quite a sight....

With a thousand emotional parents greeting them....

No such images exist!!!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25739945


And with such an evacuation -- couldn't they use the help of firefighters? TO help people in shock, at the least? OR Wouldn't the newspaper want as many reporters ON THE SCENE as possible to witness all the reunification and take accounts of what happened 20 minutes into this? And if there were people there -- they could have intervened, for instnace -- in helping the distraught children on Rosen's doorstep, who was (apparently) at such a loss for help he took them into his house?
13th-Century

User ID: 31055867
Canada
12/31/2012 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
You are really stretching to call these things "lies..."

None of the things you list are inconsistent, unless you put an absurd spin on them.

Someone who arrives 20 minutes after a shooting is "one of the first on the scene..." The pictures she took are proof that she got there while it was still unfolding.

The mention that she is "stationed" at the fire house does not mean she was there at the time... It means it's her assigned place of work.

The fact that she took pictures outside the car doesn't affect the fact that she took pictures earlier in the car.

also - the "timestamp" on the webpage is meaningless unless you know what time zone both the receiving and sending computers are set to. I routinely get email messages that are several hours off in their time due to that. Check it out.

If it was a conspiracy wouldn't it be simpler to put out a consistent story?

Sifting the trivia and turning everything into a conspiracy cheapens true conspiracies, and makes it all a joke. Do better or do something else with your time.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 519793



I was initially so saddened by this event that I was crying -- which I'm not inclined to do. So it makes me rather upset to learn that there are SO MANY inconsistencies without any clarification all over the place -- when everyone has a changing story and the facts are mercurial, I wisen up. I don't like being tricked

So, one thing that bugs me is why hell didn't that Rosen guy (who "helped" the children) call POLICE or get help from firefighters (He's next door to the firehouse) when distraught children show up on his lawn? Obviously, this editor was so unbusy that she went right back to work in her OFFICE (and even if she was doing duty at the paper - you'd think they'd want her ON THE SCENE gathering INFORMATION)

But back to ROSEN - Would you take in a bunch of distraught children INTO YOUR HOUSE and give them STUFFED ANIMALS to "play" with without alerting authorities? And he refers to how he was ESPECIALLY sad...and HOPING IT WASN'T THIS SPECIFIC TEACHER -- to find out that their teacher was "That pretty 27 year old teacher, Victoria Soto" ...sorry, was he stalking her? How does he know her age? If he DID know her, he'd certainly mention that important detail (and does not)...No, he refers to the teacher in a way that reads like a character description from a SCRIPT. I studied a little movie script writing and that precisely how you would insert a succinnt, initial character description into a movie script..."A PRETTY 27 YEAR OLD TEACHER, VICTORIA SOTO"

So, either these are LIES or this town has some serious, deep rooted rampant problems with professionalism and priorities.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837935


There is a great deal of information now on the web concerning Newtown, Connecticut, and the presence of active satanists.

In fact, I just watched a youtube video in which a very reasonable-sounding man conjectured that the whole town is part of a satanic cult.

It may be that many of the citizens are afraid of the cult members and have decided to keep quiet.



Last Edited by 13th-Century on 12/31/2012 12:04 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30670070
United States
12/31/2012 12:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
Sandy Hook firefighter dies in hospital on 12/21 (one week after 12/14), no cause of death given. Granted he's 86 years old, but still a cause of death is often stated.

[link to chappaqua.patch.com]


"He was an active member of The American Legion and served sixty-five years as a volunteer firefighter in the Hook and Ladder Fire Company of Mt. Kisco, NY. "

A firefighter for 65 years!

Even if he was in a different fire company, he might have been a first responder with his local FD to this incident. Just a datapoint ...
Pilgrim
User ID: 31218197
Ireland
12/31/2012 12:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
bump for interest.......
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28837935
United States
12/31/2012 12:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
If the editor were allowed to remain on the scene, there would be an expectation of real evacuation photos instead of a STOCK PHOTO FROM years back that is used to portray the evacuation. It's so strange someone with a camera who knows all the firefighters would be called back...to do what? I mean, there would be all this traffic and crap anyways...couldn't they coordinate ON THE PHONE? Strange.

And what sort of school takes photos of drills, anyways? Especially a photo of a drill in which one child looks (maybe) distraught? Is that normal drill activity? A normal photo of a practice drill that would be put on a school's website might have children hanging around a firetruck or doing a drill with SMILES on their face?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28837935
United States
12/31/2012 12:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
If the editor were allowed to remain on the scene, there would be an expectation of real evacuation photos instead of a STOCK PHOTO FROM years back that is used to portray the evacuation. It's so strange someone with a camera who knows all the firefighters would be called back...to do what? I mean, there would be all this traffic and crap anyways...couldn't they coordinate ON THE PHONE? Strange.

And what sort of school takes photos of drills, anyways? Especially a photo of a drill in which one child looks (maybe) distraught? Is that normal drill activity? A normal photo of a practice drill that would be put on a school's website might have children hanging around a firetruck or doing a drill with SMILES on their face?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837935


Sorry my last sentence should read:
Wouldn't a normal photo of a practice drill which would be put on a school's website have children hanging around a firetruck or doing a drill with SMILES on their faces?
13th-Century

User ID: 31055867
Canada
12/31/2012 12:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NEW Sandy Hook Lies Uncovered! ~Juicy News~
If the editor were allowed to remain on the scene, there would be an expectation of real evacuation photos instead of a STOCK PHOTO FROM years back that is used to portray the evacuation. It's so strange someone with a camera who knows all the firefighters would be called back...to do what? I mean, there would be all this traffic and crap anyways...couldn't they coordinate ON THE PHONE? Strange.

And what sort of school takes photos of drills, anyways? Especially a photo of a drill in which one child looks (maybe) distraught? Is that normal drill activity? A normal photo of a practice drill that would be put on a school's website might have children hanging around a firetruck or doing a drill with SMILES on their face?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28837935


Hey - wouldn't it be wild if even this famous photo were staged?!

Somebody knew it would be useful to have when Dec. 14th rolled around.

Just a conjecture.





GLP