Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,293 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 479,208
Pageviews Today: 780,976Threads Today: 260Posts Today: 4,233
09:26 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Declaration of Independence & The Bill of Rights VS. The US Masonic Constitution

 
PLEASE READ THIS
User ID: 29412599
United States
01/01/2013 12:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Declaration of Independence & The Bill of Rights VS. The US Masonic Constitution
The US Constitution was a betrayal of the Declaration of Independence. Real patriots such as Patrick Henry, George Mason and a few others saw it as a blueprint for empire and fought it. The Bill of Rights was added at their insistence as a defense against the Constitution! Big Banker whores such as Hamilton and the Federalists didn't want any enumerated rights - they said "You must trust us and our promises to observe your rights." Henry said, "Not good enough - we need guarantees."

In 1976, the Sovereign Grand Commander of the 33rd Degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, Henry C. Clausen, published a little book called "Masons Who Helped Shape Our Nation." On page 82, he writes: "Though free, we were not yet united [1783]. The loose Articles of Confederation did not provide a strong national government, common currency or consistent judicial system. Men of vision realized that another step must be taken if he weak Confederation of American States was to become a strong, unified nation. Again Freemasonry set the pattern in ideology and form. Since the Masonic federal system of organization was the only pattern for effective organization operating in each of the original Thirteen Colonies, it was natural that patriotic Brethren should turn to the organizational base of the Craft for a model. Regardless of the other forces that affected the formation of the Constitution during the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the fact remains that the federalism created is identical t the federalism of the Grand Lodge system of Masonic government created in Anderson's Constitutions of 1723."

PLEASE FINISH ARTICLE HERE: VERY INFORMATIVE
[link to rense.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 29412599
United States
01/01/2013 12:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Declaration of Independence & The Bill of Rights VS. The US Masonic Constitution
The US Constitution was a betrayal of the Declaration of Independence. Real patriots such as Patrick Henry, George Mason and a few others saw it as a blueprint for empire and fought it. The Bill of Rights was added at their insistence as a defense against the Constitution! Big Banker whores such as Hamilton and the Federalists didn't want any enumerated rights - they said "You must trust us and our promises to observe your rights." Henry said, "Not good enough - we need guarantees."

In 1976, the Sovereign Grand Commander of the 33rd Degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, Henry C. Clausen, published a little book called "Masons Who Helped Shape Our Nation." On page 82, he writes: "Though free, we were not yet united [1783]. The loose Articles of Confederation did not provide a strong national government, common currency or consistent judicial system. Men of vision realized that another step must be taken if he weak Confederation of American States was to become a strong, unified nation. Again Freemasonry set the pattern in ideology and form. Since the Masonic federal system of organization was the only pattern for effective organization operating in each of the original Thirteen Colonies, it was natural that patriotic Brethren should turn to the organizational base of the Craft for a model. Regardless of the other forces that affected the formation of the Constitution during the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the fact remains that the federalism created is identical t the federalism of the Grand Lodge system of Masonic government created in Anderson's Constitutions of 1723."

PLEASE FINISH ARTICLE HERE: VERY INFORMATIVE
[link to rense.com]
 Quoting: PLEASE READ THIS 29412599
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30895624
United States
01/01/2013 12:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Declaration of Independence & The Bill of Rights VS. The US Masonic Constitution
The Bill of Rights is a part of the Constitution by the way.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 29412599
United States
01/01/2013 12:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Declaration of Independence & The Bill of Rights VS. The US Masonic Constitution
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.





GLP