State trying to make sperm donor pay child support

i bet the poor bastard didn't have a clue 2 spiteful lesbos were going to kick him in the nuts 3 years down the road. never crossed his mind. but it's crossed my mind before!!!!!!!!!!! ahahahahahahaha watch sperm donations drop to nothing!!!! that's darwin bitches!!!!

or irony in eugencis. damn that would make a good t-shirt. there would have to be a picture of a guy donating flube to a sperm bank who somehow hands it to two lesbians who continue their family tree while future lesbian family trees stop abruptly.... damn how in the world am i going to draw this thing? and then all the other lesbian family trees who see their imenent demise through the treacherous actions of the initial lesbian family rise up against them and eliminate them!!!!!! and then lesbians become extinct.... until the next generation. wow maybe this is just the circle of life.

i must figure this out!!!!!!!!!! but i can't stop laughing!!!!

WHAT? Those are women!

Holy Frijoles!!!!

[link to www.youtube.com]

The latest is that they broke up, and the lesbian girl who looks a bit less like a boy has now found love with a gentleman...

What a bunch of hokey's

Any male, notice I did not say man, any male that sells his own penal excrement is in fact selling his own children. The creatures that buy this jizz have 100% odds of using it to grow little donor spawn, so every donor is selling his own children in actuality. Any male that would do that needs to be removed from the gene pool in the first place, and it is the government's job to see that this happens before problems like this surface again!

So, if the father lost his junk fighting in a war to save your ass, he can never have kids because he will never be the biological father.

You country is a fucking joke , and the laughing stock of the world

Bald girls are not cute. You could land a plane on that one girl's forehead

So guy jerks off in a cup to make some money and must now pay money for jerking off in the cup?

They buy his sperm but now he has to pay, isn't that some kind of entrapment?

If he didn't actually fuck her, it doesn't count!

To me it looks like both State and Dykes are exploiting people.

It does count it is his child . his blood . he should have thought this out before he did the deed .

Whatever the outcome of the legal battle here, seems to me lesbians are going to have a much tougher time getting people to donate sperm to their cause.

yep . good point .

I had a customer of mine several years back who was a lesbian . She brought in a baby . cute baby too. She says to me yes "this is our "turkey baster baby " . She told me how one of her guy friends came in shot into the turkey baster and then she stuck it up her 20 seconds later . the kid was a toddler . i knew he could hear her say this . and I though oh how fucked up - think about it your a kid and one day it dawns on you were created not out of lovemaking but by a plastic kitchen tool .

I respect your opinion, but refute your arguments.
Thou I'm unable to be rude, so lets go:
First of all, I'm not too much of a religious man. I'm a graduated physicist, thus, a man of science.
I'm assuming you never read "The origin of species", by a very respectable scientist, Charles Darwin.
I'm assuming that, because of the way you talk. Artificial insemination is possible, thou, not the natural way. Science did not mastered it yet, and in my opinion will take a loooong time before mastering it. Why? Simple: We don't understand nature as we think we do, there's always another trick to learn.
I do not hate homossexuals, I'm just against this behavior, for considering it wrong, and you speaking like that only proves that what I wrote is right, we are being imposed to accept it even against our will.
Evolution, happened not only because behavior, it has lots of factors that will generate mutated offspring, again, check "The Origing of Species - Charles Darwin".
In a nutshell, you defend your point of view, trying ridicule somebody else's opinion, but with no base at all.
Again, evolution is based on natural selection, note the word "natural". Now, imagine a world, where people no longer generate children in the "natural" way, only using artificial insemination, consider this:

Birth Defects

In a study that analyzed rates of birth defects between naturally conceived children and those conceived though artificial means, Hansen et al (2002) found that children conceived through the latter means were at much higher risk. For example, babies conceived through artificial insemination had an 8.6% chance of having a birth defect compared to 4.2% of naturally conceived babies.

Most likely defects

Of the seven types of defects that the researchers showcased in their study, only two reached significance as being more prevalent in artificial insemination births. These were cardiovascular, at 1.3%, and musculoskeletal, at 3.3%. In naturally conceived babies, these were at .6% and 1.1%, respectively.
The researchers submitted that some of the likely causes of the higher rate of defects could be owed to the advanced age of infertile couples, the underlying cause of the infertility and the medications prescribed during the insemination process.
Read more at: [link to www.ehow.com]

Well, I don't even need to say anything else here. Arificial insemination, has more than double chances of generating defective babies. Even when these defects are not apparent, it will be passed on through another insemination, generating even worst things. Still think this is the best way? If you do, try to read more, study more.

So, my argument that homossexuality is scientific wrong, is sustained.

And I don't need or want your advices, keep them to yourself will you?