Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,171 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 414,770
Pageviews Today: 523,210Threads Today: 92Posts Today: 1,905
04:27 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremel

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15390403
United States
01/03/2013 08:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremel
The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremely widespread and intense fires.

CL(95) = 20*LL(95)
= 20*[5*DL(95)]
= 100*DL(95)
= 100*(95/15)DL(15)
=100*6.33*DL(15)
=633*DL(15)
= 633 Force Units of upward support

where,
CL = Collapse Load for 100% & Total Collapse
LL = Live Load = Occupied & Furnished Weight
DL = Dead Load = Unoccupied, Unfurnished
110 = 110 Floor Steel WTC
95 = 95 Floor Steel Block (Lower Block)
15 = 15 Floor Steel Block (Top Block)
20 = Collapse Load Factor of John Skilling
5 = Live Load Factor of Ronald Hamburger
of NIST

Therefore, it required the Force of Weight of 633 15-Floor-Blocks pressing down on one 95-Floor-Steel-Block before the possibility of total collapse could possibly occur.

I am using the NIST and Mass Medias own published and or announced at 911 tour presentations data to make this scientific proof that one 15-Floor-Block could not, even in one’s wildest dreams totally collapse the 95-Floor-Steel-Block below.
The same application of this data will show that the other Twin Tower could not possibly collapse.

I have prepared a MS Word document with photos, data tables, graphs and other evidence aplenty to conclusively prove my assertions. If you are interested in receiving it for your own evaluation and can help me distribute it to the world, please email me at
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
and I will send you a copy at your email address.

I am also in the process of preparing a narrated PowerPoint slide show to put on the Internet. It is not complete yet.

This site is an eye-opener for me and I was not aware that it existed. I have been blined from the Truth for all of my life due to extreme censorship of school textbooks, publishers, video documentaries, movies, newpapers, magazines, etc…. I am extremely angry about this censorship. I see it all very clearly now, starting only a few years ago, starting when I read the book “Jewish Supremicism”. I have a lot more reading to do on this site, and learning to add to my disgust about be lifelong duped and deceived.
The American Free Press web site also has a lot of current and good related information for the discerning researcher.

Endless thanks to the originator of this website for exposing this otherwise extraordinarily censored history and current events. Keep up the incredible work, but you need, somehow, to get it to all of the people of the USA and the World….

How could I have been deceived, fooled, duped, defrauded for so, so, so long???

Chuck Boldwyn
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
Retired Physics & Chemistry Instructo
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5932524
United States
01/03/2013 08:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremel
'911 was a psychological operation.... this is evidence of "free energy' technology. and what I mean by "free energy" is non conventional energy that has not been metered... If I was to give it a name the name I would give it MAGNETIC ELECTRO-GRAVITIC NUCLEAR reactions. Electro-gravitic nuclear reactions describes low energy nuclear reactions which, the slang term for it is called FUSION... It doesn't take many people; folks within an organisation tend to follow the leader of the organisation. and there's undoubtedly a lot of well meaning people following that ... the official story was a psychological operation. It was very well planned. Do you think they just forgot to plan a cover up?... [If you don't accept version one, we'll give you version two.] Yeah. If you don't like version two we'll give you version one. If you have a false choice...? [Is there a version three? Is there a limited hangout?]. There seems to be some backups for that... the aim of my book is to empower the reader to understand for themselves. Instead of having to follow anybody... If you look at the evidence, the evidence will tell you exactly what happened. The buildings turned to dust.' [At: 44' - 46' mark].


This 1 hour 37' 44" video was uploaded on Nov 15, 2011: [link to www.youtube.com]


"Deal with reality before reality deals with you"
These buildings have "gone with the wind", as you say, but your bravery shall forever remain.
Thank you Judy

[link to www.drjudywood.com]
[link to wheredidthetowersgo.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29307060
United States
01/03/2013 08:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremel
The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremely widespread and intense fires.

CL(95) = 20*LL(95)
= 20*[5*DL(95)]
= 100*DL(95)
= 100*(95/15)DL(15)
=100*6.33*DL(15)
=633*DL(15)
= 633 Force Units of upward support

where,
CL = Collapse Load for 100% & Total Collapse
LL = Live Load = Occupied & Furnished Weight
DL = Dead Load = Unoccupied, Unfurnished
110 = 110 Floor Steel WTC
95 = 95 Floor Steel Block (Lower Block)
15 = 15 Floor Steel Block (Top Block)
20 = Collapse Load Factor of John Skilling
5 = Live Load Factor of Ronald Hamburger
of NIST

Therefore, it required the Force of Weight of 633 15-Floor-Blocks pressing down on one 95-Floor-Steel-Block before the possibility of total collapse could possibly occur.

I am using the NIST and Mass Medias own published and or announced at 911 tour presentations data to make this scientific proof that one 15-Floor-Block could not, even in one’s wildest dreams totally collapse the 95-Floor-Steel-Block below.
The same application of this data will show that the other Twin Tower could not possibly collapse.

I have prepared a MS Word document with photos, data tables, graphs and other evidence aplenty to conclusively prove my assertions. If you are interested in receiving it for your own evaluation and can help me distribute it to the world, please email me at
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
and I will send you a copy at your email address.

I am also in the process of preparing a narrated PowerPoint slide show to put on the Internet. It is not complete yet.

This site is an eye-opener for me and I was not aware that it existed. I have been blined from the Truth for all of my life due to extreme censorship of school textbooks, publishers, video documentaries, movies, newpapers, magazines, etc…. I am extremely angry about this censorship. I see it all very clearly now, starting only a few years ago, starting when I read the book “Jewish Supremicism”. I have a lot more reading to do on this site, and learning to add to my disgust about be lifelong duped and deceived.
The American Free Press web site also has a lot of current and good related information for the discerning researcher.

Endless thanks to the originator of this website for exposing this otherwise extraordinarily censored history and current events. Keep up the incredible work, but you need, somehow, to get it to all of the people of the USA and the World….

How could I have been deceived, fooled, duped, defrauded for so, so, so long???

Chuck Boldwyn
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
Retired Physics & Chemistry Instructo
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15390403

Under normal circumstances you are right.
You failed to factor in the strength(or lack thereof) of molten metal and concrete under extreme heat.
Please recalculate to include these factors.
7even

User ID: 30884478
United Kingdom
01/03/2013 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremel
The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremely widespread and intense fires.

CL(95) = 20*LL(95)
= 20*[5*DL(95)]
= 100*DL(95)
= 100*(95/15)DL(15)
=100*6.33*DL(15)
=633*DL(15)
= 633 Force Units of upward support

where,
CL = Collapse Load for 100% & Total Collapse
LL = Live Load = Occupied & Furnished Weight
DL = Dead Load = Unoccupied, Unfurnished
110 = 110 Floor Steel WTC
95 = 95 Floor Steel Block (Lower Block)
15 = 15 Floor Steel Block (Top Block)
20 = Collapse Load Factor of John Skilling
5 = Live Load Factor of Ronald Hamburger
of NIST

Therefore, it required the Force of Weight of 633 15-Floor-Blocks pressing down on one 95-Floor-Steel-Block before the possibility of total collapse could possibly occur.

I am using the NIST and Mass Medias own published and or announced at 911 tour presentations data to make this scientific proof that one 15-Floor-Block could not, even in one’s wildest dreams totally collapse the 95-Floor-Steel-Block below.
The same application of this data will show that the other Twin Tower could not possibly collapse.

I have prepared a MS Word document with photos, data tables, graphs and other evidence aplenty to conclusively prove my assertions. If you are interested in receiving it for your own evaluation and can help me distribute it to the world, please email me at
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
and I will send you a copy at your email address.

I am also in the process of preparing a narrated PowerPoint slide show to put on the Internet. It is not complete yet.

This site is an eye-opener for me and I was not aware that it existed. I have been blined from the Truth for all of my life due to extreme censorship of school textbooks, publishers, video documentaries, movies, newpapers, magazines, etc…. I am extremely angry about this censorship. I see it all very clearly now, starting only a few years ago, starting when I read the book “Jewish Supremicism”. I have a lot more reading to do on this site, and learning to add to my disgust about be lifelong duped and deceived.
The American Free Press web site also has a lot of current and good related information for the discerning researcher.

Endless thanks to the originator of this website for exposing this otherwise extraordinarily censored history and current events. Keep up the incredible work, but you need, somehow, to get it to all of the people of the USA and the World….

How could I have been deceived, fooled, duped, defrauded for so, so, so long???

Chuck Boldwyn
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
Retired Physics & Chemistry Instructo
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15390403

Under normal circumstances you are right.
You failed to factor in the strength(or lack thereof) of molten metal and concrete under extreme heat.
Please recalculate to include these factors.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29307060


Just how much of the steel frame do you presume heated and plasticised by the limited heat source. NIST's own report stated the majority of the fuel burnt off in the fireball. Even if, and personally I doubt it, enough heat was generated to initiate collapse how many other parts of the steel frame lower down do you presume weakened? More importantly how?
7even
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31085608
United States
01/03/2013 09:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremel
All the scientific proof in the world doesn't seem to be enough to break the hold that whoever pulled off 911 has on the govt. and news media.

It is an in your face fuck you to all of us who understand mechanical engineering, and forensic failure mode analysis.

We will likely be among those who are taken away in the middle of the night never to be seen again when the real purge of honest, knowledgeable, moral, ethical and patriotic individuals begins.

History repeats itself...

Endlessly...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29307060
United States
01/03/2013 10:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremel
The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremely widespread and intense fires.

CL(95) = 20*LL(95)
= 20*[5*DL(95)]
= 100*DL(95)
= 100*(95/15)DL(15)
=100*6.33*DL(15)
=633*DL(15)
= 633 Force Units of upward support

where,
CL = Collapse Load for 100% & Total Collapse
LL = Live Load = Occupied & Furnished Weight
DL = Dead Load = Unoccupied, Unfurnished
110 = 110 Floor Steel WTC
95 = 95 Floor Steel Block (Lower Block)
15 = 15 Floor Steel Block (Top Block)
20 = Collapse Load Factor of John Skilling
5 = Live Load Factor of Ronald Hamburger
of NIST

Therefore, it required the Force of Weight of 633 15-Floor-Blocks pressing down on one 95-Floor-Steel-Block before the possibility of total collapse could possibly occur.

I am using the NIST and Mass Medias own published and or announced at 911 tour presentations data to make this scientific proof that one 15-Floor-Block could not, even in one’s wildest dreams totally collapse the 95-Floor-Steel-Block below.
The same application of this data will show that the other Twin Tower could not possibly collapse.

I have prepared a MS Word document with photos, data tables, graphs and other evidence aplenty to conclusively prove my assertions. If you are interested in receiving it for your own evaluation and can help me distribute it to the world, please email me at
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
and I will send you a copy at your email address.

I am also in the process of preparing a narrated PowerPoint slide show to put on the Internet. It is not complete yet.

This site is an eye-opener for me and I was not aware that it existed. I have been blined from the Truth for all of my life due to extreme censorship of school textbooks, publishers, video documentaries, movies, newpapers, magazines, etc…. I am extremely angry about this censorship. I see it all very clearly now, starting only a few years ago, starting when I read the book “Jewish Supremicism”. I have a lot more reading to do on this site, and learning to add to my disgust about be lifelong duped and deceived.
The American Free Press web site also has a lot of current and good related information for the discerning researcher.

Endless thanks to the originator of this website for exposing this otherwise extraordinarily censored history and current events. Keep up the incredible work, but you need, somehow, to get it to all of the people of the USA and the World….

How could I have been deceived, fooled, duped, defrauded for so, so, so long???

Chuck Boldwyn
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
Retired Physics & Chemistry Instructo
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15390403

Under normal circumstances you are right.
You failed to factor in the strength(or lack thereof) of molten metal and concrete under extreme heat.
Please recalculate to include these factors.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29307060


Just how much of the steel frame do you presume heated and plasticised by the limited heat source. NIST's own report stated the majority of the fuel burnt off in the fireball. Even if, and personally I doubt it, enough heat was generated to initiate collapse how many other parts of the steel frame lower down do you presume weakened? More importantly how?
 Quoting: 7even

And you believe the NIST's report? That says it all!
You say its a government coverup, but believe and use data from a government agency!
UnmannedAerialPilot

User ID: 18327004
United States
01/03/2013 10:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremel
The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremely widespread and intense fires.

CL(95) = 20*LL(95)
= 20*[5*DL(95)]
= 100*DL(95)
= 100*(95/15)DL(15)
=100*6.33*DL(15)
=633*DL(15)
= 633 Force Units of upward support

where,
CL = Collapse Load for 100% & Total Collapse
LL = Live Load = Occupied & Furnished Weight
DL = Dead Load = Unoccupied, Unfurnished
110 = 110 Floor Steel WTC
95 = 95 Floor Steel Block (Lower Block)
15 = 15 Floor Steel Block (Top Block)
20 = Collapse Load Factor of John Skilling
5 = Live Load Factor of Ronald Hamburger
of NIST

Therefore, it required the Force of Weight of 633 15-Floor-Blocks pressing down on one 95-Floor-Steel-Block before the possibility of total collapse could possibly occur.

I am using the NIST and Mass Medias own published and or announced at 911 tour presentations data to make this scientific proof that one 15-Floor-Block could not, even in one’s wildest dreams totally collapse the 95-Floor-Steel-Block below.
The same application of this data will show that the other Twin Tower could not possibly collapse.

I have prepared a MS Word document with photos, data tables, graphs and other evidence aplenty to conclusively prove my assertions. If you are interested in receiving it for your own evaluation and can help me distribute it to the world, please email me at
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
and I will send you a copy at your email address.

I am also in the process of preparing a narrated PowerPoint slide show to put on the Internet. It is not complete yet.

This site is an eye-opener for me and I was not aware that it existed. I have been blined from the Truth for all of my life due to extreme censorship of school textbooks, publishers, video documentaries, movies, newpapers, magazines, etc…. I am extremely angry about this censorship. I see it all very clearly now, starting only a few years ago, starting when I read the book “Jewish Supremicism”. I have a lot more reading to do on this site, and learning to add to my disgust about be lifelong duped and deceived.
The American Free Press web site also has a lot of current and good related information for the discerning researcher.

Endless thanks to the originator of this website for exposing this otherwise extraordinarily censored history and current events. Keep up the incredible work, but you need, somehow, to get it to all of the people of the USA and the World….

How could I have been deceived, fooled, duped, defrauded for so, so, so long???

Chuck Boldwyn
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
Retired Physics & Chemistry Instructo
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15390403

Under normal circumstances you are right.
You failed to factor in the strength(or lack thereof) of molten metal and concrete under extreme heat.
Please recalculate to include these factors.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29307060


Just how much of the steel frame do you presume heated and plasticised by the limited heat source. NIST's own report stated the majority of the fuel burnt off in the fireball. Even if, and personally I doubt it, enough heat was generated to initiate collapse how many other parts of the steel frame lower down do you presume weakened? More importantly how?
 Quoting: 7even

And you believe the NIST's report? That says it all!
You say its a government coverup, but believe and use data from a government agency!

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29307060


You are so obviously trying to ruin this thread, you should e ashamed of yourself. You sell out the free-thinking, wide-awake people of this world to your corrupt masters and don't think you will be held accountable. The LORD knows your shill tactics and ALL who do the bidding of the Great Whore will catch her diseases and will be judged. God bless you OP, may God protect your thread of truth from these vicious liars and devils.
fnord
User ID: 29623822
United States
01/03/2013 10:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremel
Everybody has a theory what happened that day.

The only thing everybody agrees on is that what the media and government told us happened, did not.

Even the disinfo artists start from the premise that the official story is utterly wrong.

Is there a person in the world left who believes the official account of anything?
7even

User ID: 30884478
United Kingdom
01/05/2013 09:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremel
The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremely widespread and intense fires.

CL(95) = 20*LL(95)
= 20*[5*DL(95)]
= 100*DL(95)
= 100*(95/15)DL(15)
=100*6.33*DL(15)
=633*DL(15)
= 633 Force Units of upward support

where,
CL = Collapse Load for 100% & Total Collapse
LL = Live Load = Occupied & Furnished Weight
DL = Dead Load = Unoccupied, Unfurnished
110 = 110 Floor Steel WTC
95 = 95 Floor Steel Block (Lower Block)
15 = 15 Floor Steel Block (Top Block)
20 = Collapse Load Factor of John Skilling
5 = Live Load Factor of Ronald Hamburger
of NIST

Therefore, it required the Force of Weight of 633 15-Floor-Blocks pressing down on one 95-Floor-Steel-Block before the possibility of total collapse could possibly occur.

I am using the NIST and Mass Medias own published and or announced at 911 tour presentations data to make this scientific proof that one 15-Floor-Block could not, even in one’s wildest dreams totally collapse the 95-Floor-Steel-Block below.
The same application of this data will show that the other Twin Tower could not possibly collapse.

I have prepared a MS Word document with photos, data tables, graphs and other evidence aplenty to conclusively prove my assertions. If you are interested in receiving it for your own evaluation and can help me distribute it to the world, please email me at
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
and I will send you a copy at your email address.

I am also in the process of preparing a narrated PowerPoint slide show to put on the Internet. It is not complete yet.

This site is an eye-opener for me and I was not aware that it existed. I have been blined from the Truth for all of my life due to extreme censorship of school textbooks, publishers, video documentaries, movies, newpapers, magazines, etc…. I am extremely angry about this censorship. I see it all very clearly now, starting only a few years ago, starting when I read the book “Jewish Supremicism”. I have a lot more reading to do on this site, and learning to add to my disgust about be lifelong duped and deceived.
The American Free Press web site also has a lot of current and good related information for the discerning researcher.

Endless thanks to the originator of this website for exposing this otherwise extraordinarily censored history and current events. Keep up the incredible work, but you need, somehow, to get it to all of the people of the USA and the World….

How could I have been deceived, fooled, duped, defrauded for so, so, so long???

Chuck Boldwyn
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
Retired Physics & Chemistry Instructo
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15390403

Under normal circumstances you are right.
You failed to factor in the strength(or lack thereof) of molten metal and concrete under extreme heat.
Please recalculate to include these factors.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29307060


Just how much of the steel frame do you presume heated and plasticised by the limited heat source. NIST's own report stated the majority of the fuel burnt off in the fireball. Even if, and personally I doubt it, enough heat was generated to initiate collapse how many other parts of the steel frame lower down do you presume weakened? More importantly how?
 Quoting: 7even

And you believe the NIST's report? That says it all!
You say its a government coverup, but believe and use data from a government agency!

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29307060


If you think about what I put, even NIST's report. I was clearly trying to take that piece of fiction and attempting to turn it in on itself. When I claimed it says in the report most of the fuel burnt off I am pointing out the internal logic flaws that it is full of!

Last Edited by 7even on 01/05/2013 09:55 PM
7even

News