DELIBERATE INCONSISTENCIES Are Embedded in Sandy Hook Official Story - Video

It is very curious indeed that no one is considering this information on the forum today.

Can an engineered life changing event for all Americans, in the same way 9/11 was really only have a shelf life of less than a month of those interested in the inconsistencies?

I am working on a "Who Is" list for the alleged victims.
Anybody else want to help?

I am working on Rekos. Or Reekos, as the father's name is listed in Jigsaw.

[link to www.jigsaw.com]

Excellent video. Excellent.

There is a pattern in that Mary Sherlach, depending on the media article list her husband as Robert, Bill, and Mark.

How do you make an error like that?

The Robert guy she is always shown in a photo with is in a relationship with Denise Labunski!!

[link to www.facebook.com]

Here's a little explanation of the psychological processes involved, when the public is subjected to these "inconsistencies" in such a very emotional context.

Whenever a person accepts "the official storyline," the common sense of their inner self cries out, silently: "No, no, it couldn't happen this way. No, no, these people are not behaving like bereaved parents. No, no, the police would not handle a gun suspected of being used in a crime like this. No, no, there had to be more than one shooter; so who did they chase into the woods?"

This inner cry of "No" is overwhelmed by the person's desire to respect the authority of law enforcement, to avoid ridicule by friends and family, to agree that the TV broadcasters are trustworthy, as always.

But the psychological conflict inside, the 'cognitive dissonance,' creates a great deal of internal stress.

Uncertainty.

Confusion.

Even anger -- which can take the form of attacking researchers as 'conspiracy nuts'.

The result is that when these events are repeated, over and over again, in different places, with different victims reported killed, and with whole new sets of "inconsistencies," a person who is not aware of the mind control techniques being used just reels in dismay.

He or she becomes even more malleable, even more easy to control.

Because the emotions are raw.

Because the intellectual defenses against further programming have been disarmed.

Consider this tie-in...

If it is true, as reported by Daily Kos, that the result of Obama Biden's gun legislation will ultimately be raids against U.S. citizens to grab their guns, then it is inevitable that many neighbourhoods throughout the United States will witness the violent deaths of many otherwise law-abiding Americans who believe the 2nd Amendment is worth fighting for.

The media, however, will demonize these dead gunowners.

We will be told "They were part of a militia group"; or "they were terrorists"; or "they were child kidnappers and abusers" etc. etc. etc.

There will be deliberate inconsistencies in the official news stories of these events.... who shot first... what weapons were found in the homes... how a witness family member just "disappeared'...

Psychologically prepped and paralyzed, Americans will do nothing to stop this, if the government's plans succeed.

And so the article below makes sense:

High-profile killings of dissident Americans set to begin as soon as February 22nd.

US Federal Court rulings have granted the Obama administration the right to kill, without trial or charges, any American the President's team so chooses, and keep the reason(s) for doing so secret.

In explaining how the country has reached this point in the degradation of our nation, here is the exact wording used by United States District Court Judge Colleen McMahon who in handing down the most recent ruling legitimizing such an incredible expansion of government violence against its own people.

She said:

“The Alice-in-Wonderland nature of this pronouncement is not lost on me; but after careful consideration, I find myself stuck in a paradoxical situation in which I cannot solve a problem because of contradictory constraints and rules — a veritable Catch-22. I can find no way around the thicket of laws and precedents that effectively allow the Executive Branch of our Government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws, while keeping the reason for their conclusion a secret.”

A similarly chilling ruling was issued last month by United States Appeals Court Judge Raymond Lohier, which allows the American President to detain indefinitely any citizen he so chooses without trial or charges, a move so grave and draconian it led to the Academy Award-winning director Oliver Stone saying about Obama:

“I think under the disguise of sheep’s clothing he has been a wolf. That because of the nightmare of the Bush presidency that preceded him, people forgave him a lot. He was a great hope for change. The color of his skin, the upbringing, the internationalism, the globalism, seemed all evident. And he is an intelligent man. He has taken all the Bush changes he basically put them into the establishment, he has codified them.

"That is what is sad. So we are going into the second administration that is living outside the law and does not respect the law and foundations of our system and he is a constitutional lawyer, you know. Without the law, it is the law of the jungle. Nuremburg existed for a reason and there was a reason to have trials, there is a reason for due process – ‘habeas corpus’ as they call it in the United States.”

Far sooner than anyone wants to imagine, it can be supposed citizens were not complying with the new gun control laws, that Vice President Joseph Biden “guaranteed” Boston Mayor Thomas Menino would be enacted by the end of January, will find themselves in danger.

Law Enforcement or Death Squads

VIPER teams, which is the acronym for Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response Team, operate under a programme run by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), whose agents report to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

[link to www.conservativenewscentral.com]

I don't know about this. I think the sheeple don't even recognize the inconsistencies. They aren't following these incidents as closely as some of us who can readily see the problems. They accept it on day one and that's the end of it. They may make donations but they 100% trust the media and won't even consider that these events could be false flags.

Because I research these things, I can tell you that the inconsistencies, if intentional do not make me more malleable. Quite the contrary.

Sorry you don't get the point.

Let's try again.

Follow me closely now.

The "sheeple accept it on day one" -- right -- but even the sheeple can see for themselves that things don't add up.

A lot of the people asking questions about this all over the internet are not the usual shit-disturbers.

Many straight-and-narrow MSM lovers are genuinely struggling with this inconsistent news reports.

There are millions more of them who never dare articulate their uneasiness.

Those are the ones the video is talking about, and those are the ones who are open to be manipulated in even more terrible scenarios down the road.

Please watch the video again. The man addressing the camera is not a smooth talker, but he has investigated more truth in the past two years than anyone else in even the alternative media.

Thank you, Morris.

Wow, Robert De Niro with red hair!

[link to hollywoodlife.com]

Nancy tells HollyBaby.com exclusively, “Logan started kindergarten in September 2012. He was perfectly fine in September and October, and then in November he started acting strange. I got an email from his teacher saying he was a little weepy and then I started getting phone calls that Logan was crying and wanted to go home. Eventually it got so bad that I took him to the doctor who ran tests, saying that Logan was perfectly healthy.”

“I remember the principal, Dawn Hochsprung, getting on her knees and saying to Logan, ‘We love you and this is a wonderful place.’ Logan screamed back saying, ‘No, no! It’s not a safe place. I am scared.’ Logan’s doctor suggested that we take him out of school for a couple of weeks and home school him.

Amazing story, any way you look at it.

“I remember the principal, Dawn Hochsprung, getting on her knees and saying to Logan, ‘We love you and this is a wonderful place.’ Logan screamed back saying, ‘No, no! It’s not a safe place. I am scared.’ Logan’s doctor suggested that we take him out of school for a couple of weeks and home school him. So we had a tutor come in once a day for an hour and we would visit the school once a week so he could see his friends and teachers. But whenever we visited the school, he would start shaking and trembling. He would cry and he wouldn’t open his eyes,” said Karen.

The principal and the school psychologist Mary Sherlock, 56, who spoke to Logan on the phone daily while he was being home schooled, were both among the first killed in the shootings.

“Logan was perfectly normal wherever we were except at school,” Karen explained. “We couldn’t even say the word ‘school’ in the house because he would get so upset.

What makes no sense here is that the mother says she took that poor kid back to the school once a week - to traumatize him some more?

She also says the principal and the school psychologist spoke to him daily on the phone. This is so unlikely, people.

Or if they did check in daily on the phone, I can only conclude the principal and the psychologist are not really dead now, but they were insiders, involved in the scheme. They were afraid that little Logan would psychically pick up DETAILS, and they wanted to be sure that was not the case.

What really makes my skin crawl is the principal bending down and telling Logan, "We love you."

Excuse me, no teacher or principal has any business saying that manipulative crap to a child, who should know that his parents are the ones who love him, not somebody paid to pretend!

The more I read this account, it smells.

I guess. I just don't see why this mother would be giving an exclusive interview about it to somebody called hollybaby or hollywoodlife. It makes me kind of leery of it altogether.
Can you give me a rationale as to how this would have been arranged to come about?

It looks like this 'Holly-Weird' story is designed to reinforce the idea that children were actually killed at the school. More and more, that is looking very unlikely, as this new thread points out:

Thread: "CHILD SLAVES SELL, we are told, for well over $200,000." So - Were the Sandy Hook kids stolen?

If any of the children or adults "really died" it could be as simple as needing body organs for someone important in their organization. It could be sacrificial as well. Otherwise if they are "missing" I suspect it involves pedophile slaves, who knows for sure? All I know is that the official story is a "lie" and these deeds were evil in nature whether anyone died or not. May God disclose the truth for all to see......

What did they do at school beginning in November that made the child act out?
rehearsing?
rehearsal?

or is he psychic so the mother is semi auditioning him for future roles? lol

and why any mother would go to Hollywood life? What would the Hollywood wierdos see in this article that we don't?

I don't know that anyone was killed at the school but the outcome remains the same.

They could use random pics and invented storylines and a few alleged parents to back it up.
Why these people would involve themselves to help sell the story is anybody's guess.

This event or parody event has many layers.
That's why it won't be easy to crack more than
it already has in that it is an illusion.

Could it have been a trick to steal kids to sell on the black market? Only if you believe that these parents all sold out or existed in the first place.

I am not seeing this but it does appear this event was at least a couple years in the planning stages.

Where it was chosen. Why it was chosen. How it would best be accomplished. Every aspect.
There does seem to be a demonic element or Bohemian Grove Luciferian facet to it. But, all that does it make it more unbelievable to the average person who might only have watched this event in 30 second soundbites.

In Jesus' Name.

Amen.



OP,

I think it traumatizes even those who do see through it, who do register the inconsistencies and ask questions. Maybe even more that it does the sheeple, because apparently there's not a damn thing we can do about it.

Thank you GOD for the people on this thread!
I am so glad you are here with me.

except that the mainstream public knows nothing of these inconsistencies...only those on the fringe.

no one i know with guns has shot me or has missed me so i'm cool with having them, but thisisn't about guns

The inconsistencies might or might not be deliberate. Movie makers pay big bucks for continuity supervisors. Some of these inconsistencies are easy to make. Others seem too strange like the nurse saying that mother worked as teacher at school for a long time.
How should this be handled?
I would say just press on and get out the word. Some things don’t add up like the real owner of the black car where shotgun/rifle found being a known criminal from Norwalk. Or evidence of two other suspects held.
New Age (Something that begins with ‘M’) of this group put out a Sandy Hook website with a group of links. She got over 5,000 hits in a short time.
This is what needs to be done.

That may be, but no one around here is shocked.

What's up with this? What are they trying to do?

Op....check out all sandy hook threads. There is one about donation sites being up days in advance.

the thing I think deserves the most scrutiny is the supposed school evacuation, the response time from "first responders" who was actually let into the school, etc.

and of course the clampdown on every bit of information regarding this supposed open and closed case

look at this Washington Post article where they say NO NEWTOWN EMTS WENT INTO THE SCHOOL THAT DAY!!! Who the hell did? There is a lot more in this "official" article from such an impeachable source as the Washington Post...

"On Dec. 14, none of Newtown’s EMTs entered the school."

[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

Good video.

My question is who would you vote for as best actors -

Sandy hook or Aurora. Tough call.

Here's an Aurora tape I pulled up.

I know it's old hat by now but the exact same features

No Tears
No Anger
Very Calm talking about death and blood
Very Accepting
Very Fake

Mind you the she lost her love one.

By the way her and Tanner Coon and the other Aurora actors did make the rounds so there is some video to look at.

[link to www.youtube.com]

I guess the Sikh shootings are Bollywood so they are not eligible for any awards here.

I have not read this thread I will later, but I have thought of this. The bottom line however is evidence of photo-shopped photos in MSM newspapers. I don't really care what they say on the news or how many times they correct or add something verbally, but real evidence can not be ignored. I'm still looking for this stuff.

Thanks good thread

Good post.

This article has so many interesting bits in it, here are a few that caught my eye:

"Dozens of units from several jurisdictions would follow, barreling up Dickinson Drive toward the school, where the initial report indicated an active threat and multiple casualties. But the reality that greeted most first responders was confounding: There were people to evacuate but none to save."

...EMTs and firefighters stood like sentinels outside the school, waiting to be useful, even after a paramedic exited the building and told Chief Halstead that everybody who was still inside would not be coming out."


[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

How many paramedics went in? Who decided that all the victims were apparently so obviously and completely dead, all of them, so as to not require attempted recuscitation?

Sally Ride....the name stuff does get weird. Sorry off topic. She was just mentioned in Law and Order/ C.I. .....a lot of interesting things are mentioned in that show i'm finding....probably all crap though?