Hey Mr Darwin, just a casual question about what you'll grow and 'evolve' to be, k chump?

great tune I love the Beach Boys and Brian Wilson!!

I want to evolve into a Venomous, Egg-Laying, Duck-Billed, Beaver-Tailed, Otter.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/06/2013 01:54 AM

:munkee : Me too!

I'm glad mankind developed the mutation that allowed them to process lactose. I fucking love cheese.

I hope all these idiots asking Darwin questions realise that he evolved in to what we all are destined to become... dead.

Isn't that devolving?

no

what you continue to do is akin to flogging a dead horse
in an attempt to make it trot for you

which is unevolved, to say the least but not devolved

devolved is what happens when you realise you don't know everything and you delegate to others who do

hope that helps :-)

Darwin's theory of NON-intelligent design was a dead horse from the start and his church can't flog it to life any more than they can find a single half this half that fossil of any species ever. Wonder why that is.

Since you were asking about elephants earlier, here you go. Hint: they've found fossils for all of these species.

[link to ageofdinosaurs.com]

Darwins been dead for quite some time.

Pretty easy to win an argument with someone that can't reply.

Even easier against his church, no fossil, no evidence just a theory.

Plenty of species but none turned into another. Genetic law requires cells replicate exactly or mutate to death.

Most monkeys are smarter than you. At least they don't believe in childish fairy stories.

Tru DAT!!!Darwin is DEAD...but aren't all his modern day evolutionists still waiting to see what the Duck billed Platypus will grow up to be? maybe someday it will fly? now THATS a good childish fairy story!

Darwin can never make a man out of a monkey but he's great at making monkeys out of men and leading them into a make believe world of sy/fy fairy tales.

I agree with evolution and it applies to every other animal on earth apart from Human beings to a certain point in time, when we "jumped" or "skipped" a step in evolution which is impossible, so now you add sitchins theory to that and bam you have your answer "genetic manipulation" i mean we have evidence of it in our chromosomes, we have evidence in the "missing link" Human beings don't belong here as much as other animals do in a way but hey if you want to completely call Darwin an idiot that's fine but his theories work well for every other animal apart from us and that is telling you something.

Bringing religious fairy tales into the fray means nothing and will always mean nothing and the sooner you understand that the better.

Maybe you should study other cultures and work out the real truth of "Gods" for yourself, i agree some were completely made up but i believe some were beings from another world described in the only way a man could of "Gods"

But yeah as i said evolution is correct for all species, except for man at least until a certain point.

You believe that positive traits being passed on to following generations is a fairy tale, yet you believe that the world being poofed into existence in seven days by a magic sky wizard, a talking snake, and a chick being made from a bone torn out of a man's stomach to be hard science?

Religion is based on ancient people with Schizophrenia, if i went into the street and started talking to a bush i'm sure i would end up in a mental hospital. The only people who are making men looks dumb as monkeys are religious people, at
least Darwin tried to find the answers rather than putting it down to an act of a magical man in the sky, that's all religion is a way to not have to find the answers for yourself.

Humans...

The human species is explained by magical amoebas? If after millions of years they became extinct because of turning into humans what are these?

The Human Genome Project has dished up some real surprises to scientists. The first surprise was the vast percentage of the human DNA that is inactive. It is estimated that at least 97% of our DNA is in actual fact a waste of space, as it does not contain any active genes that actually carry the code for any of our physical makeup.

Then within the genes there are Introns – parts that do not carry any code; and Exons - sections that carry some sort of genetic code. The full length of our DNA is made up of some 20 000 genes that have now been identified.

These genes carry the blueprint for the structure of our entire body. What is very puzzling is the fact that Homo sapiens, as the supposed pinnacle if civilized evolution on this planet, should have such large parts of unused DNA. We seem to have the longest DNA molecule among all other species, but we use the smallest part of it in proportion to the other species. In other words, all the other creatures use much more of their DNA than humans do. Some species use as much as 98% of their DNA.

This flies directly in the face of the principles of evolution.

Humans should have the most complex and evolved DNA of all creatures, to have reached levels of civilization seemingly much higher than any other species on Earth over millions of years of evolution. What is even more curious is the predicted number of genes in species. The numbers seem to increase steadily from basic organisms to the most advanced. We would expect that humans should end up having most genes, but strangely this is not the case.

Here are some examples of the predictions for total number of genes in species.
Fruit Fly 21 000
Zebrafish 50 000
Chicken 76 000
Mouse 81 000
Chimp 130 000
Human 68 000
Can you see the problem here?

The Chimp is our closes know genetic relative and yet it has almost twice as many genes as humans.

And then we get to the anomaly of the chromosomes. Our DNA is broken up into 23 pairs of chromosomes. By comparison, all apes have 24 pairs. One would expect that Homo erectus, our immediate evolutionary precursor would then also have had 24 chromosome pairs.

Just one year ago on 6 April 2005, researchers from the National Human Genome Research Institute announced that,
“A detailed analysis of chromosomes 2 and 4 has detected the largest “gene deserts” known in the human genome and uncovered more evidence that human chromosome 2 arose from the fusion of two ancestral ape chromosomes” as reported in Nature.
It is also the second largest chromosome we possess and it seems to make no sense why 2 primordial chromosomes should have merged to make us human, if this new chromosome gives us no apparent advantage for survival.

So when we read in the Sumerian tablets that humans were cloned as a sub-species between Homo erectus and a more advanced human-like species that arrived on Earth some 400 000 years ago, it suddenly makes a little bit more sense. The tablets describe how our maker removed certain parts of the “Tree of life” to trim the ability of the new “creature” and how they struggled to make the perfect “primitive worker” so that it could understand commands but not be too smart to question their existence.

Similar suggestions of genetic cloning are made in The Koran and Hindu Laws of Manu.

The Koran:
• Ya Sin: “Is man not aware that We created him from a little germ?”
• The Believers - God says almost verbatim what the Sumerian tablets tell us. “We first created man from an essence of clay; then placed him a living germ in a secure enclosure. The germ we made a clot of blood, and the clot a lump of flesh. This we fashioned into bones, then clothed the bones with flesh…”
Laws of Manu:
• 19. But from minute body (-framing) particles of these seven very powerful Purushas springs this (world), the perishable from the imperishable.
• 20. Among them each succeeding (element) acquires the quality of the preceding one, and whatever place (in the sequence) each of them occupies, even so many qualities it is declared to possess.
Notice the reference to “We” by the creator. The cloning of humans as a more primitive worker or “lulu amelu” suddenly does not seem so far fetched and the strange genetic anomalies seem to support some genetic manipulation in our distant past. The modern-day researchers go further to say that this “fusion” of our chromosome 2 is what makes us human.

Are we getting closer to proving that humans were created by his MAKER as slaves to work in the early gold mines on Earth? It certainly seems like it.

Your assumption is flawed.

I don't think they know he is dead.

wonder away..

it's fruitless though - if you disagree then present your own arguements ; inspire

don't flog a dead one

seriosly pal - if you are so smart and divinely and intelligently created - show a bit of it

instead of these endless challenges to a dead and dated scientist

Good request

thank you so much

i'm inspired
- that was inspirational :-))

i wish that level of graphic representaion was available for more inter, intra and extracellular processes

dreams of the future

it's simply divine :-)x

It's amazing human science has become at least able to explore divine design but, to be able to explain it? Will man ever become that educated?

actually, yes they will.......


"They will not do any harm or cause any ruin in all my hoy mountain; because the earth will certainly be filled with the knowledge of Jehovah"- Isaiah 11:9

.....is not evolution based on vivid imagination. like "Once upon a time far far away"?

Armesis presents justification for the divine destruction of religions as depicted in Revelation ch 17-18. Darwin however didn't seek an explanation of creation, he didn't even have a question, just a smoke screen of denial and confusion, a theory of NON-intelligent 'design', mocking the scientific ignorance of the gullible masses, quite like the religious charlatans his church competes with.

The real difference is clergyman learned how to cash in on hellfire theories, Chuck's church never did because it only offers hopelessness.