|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Hey Mr Darwin, just a casual question about what you'll grow and 'evolve' to be, k chump?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
DGN |
|
Post Content
|
In my experience man's consistent, inconsistencies reveal he works in destructively mysterious ways.
"The heart is more treacherous than anything else and is desperate. Who can know it? 10 I, Jehovah, am searching the heart, examining the kidneys, even to give to each one according to his ways, according to the fruitage of his dealings." Jer17:9
Quoting: DGN (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.[1] In a non sequitur, the conclusion could be either true or false, but the argument is fallacious because there is a disconnection between the premise and the conclusion. All invalid arguments are special cases of non sequitur. The term has special applicability in law, having a formal legal definition. Many types of known non sequitur argument forms have been classified into many different types of logical fallacies.  "That's not logical"  but I really enjoyed it, even if i don't understand the tit for tat... gotta study it a while... 
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
