The Three Awesomest Constitutional Amendments Ever Proposed

best: 2,9,10

worst: 16,17,18 (luckily the 18th has been repealed. 1 down, 2 to go.)

double post

Last Edited by Anonymous Cowherder on 01/06/2013 10:24 PM

I love imao.us!
But why the indirect link? I think the article should've been directly linked.

How about this. Every person has the right to do whatever they want as long as it does not infringe on any other persons right to do whatever they want.

Sounds nice except people don't think that far ahead of themselves from what I noticed

Continue?

Nice rule to live by, but in practice it sounds like a legal nightmare. The courts would be even more choked than they currently are trying to determine if Party A infringed Party B, or vice versa, or who should be liable, or if Party C (the government) had a hand in it and/or if the deep public pockets could be picked.

Just a thought...

I never said it would be easy

True, and a very good and important point, I'll grant you.

Writer Keln has some decent follow-on and superlative thoughts about even further restrictions on the Federal government: [link to www.nukingpolitics.com]

I love imo.us! The "Nuke the Moon" essay should be required reading in schools and colleges throughout the land.

I love imo.us! The "Nuke the Moon" essay should be required reading in schools and colleges throughout the land.

What he said!

What'd he say?

The text I intended to quote apparently came from No Dhimmi's sig. Sorry for the error!

He said:

Proud Infidel !!!

The religion of submission cannot survive an open and honest discussion of its convoluted and foolish scriptures, its sexually perverted terrorist prophet, or its deceitful and demented god. When Western leaders become unified and resolute in their hostility to Islam's violent and ungodly beginnings, Muslims will flee the religion because they will be horrified by its endorsement of terrorism, mass murder, slave trading, plunder, kidnapping, and rape.

If Muslims & their apologists really want to cure "Islamophobia," here is an easy way. Focus their indignation on Muslims committing violent acts in the name of Islam, not on non-Muslims reporting on those acts.

Bukhari:V4B52N268 "Allah's Apostle said, 'War is deceit.'"

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them." ~ Founding Father, George Mason, Co-author of the Second Amendment.

[link to www.faithfreedom.org]
[link to thereligionofpeace.com]
[link to prophetofdoom.net]
[link to www.bibleprobe.com]
[link to www.fatherzakaria.net]

Islam is not a race - the racism rant is lame, used by the intellectually lazy to derail the debate.

Ah. Just saw this on another thread, but there's better commentary on this one.

I think this thread might be a double post. And "awesomest" might be a bit of a reach since Mark Levin's are better. Plus he has more momentum behind them.

Sorry it has taken me forever and a day to respond, but on balance I think you might be right. And I mean about all your points.

Still, if not "awesomest", at least way up there in my book. I agree that Levin has more momentum, and I think that is probably for many reasons, starting with "his are better", but IMHO that's not the entire story. But it is enough, so I guess it doesn't warrant speculating on the other reasons.

These would be nice, but I'll join you in rooting for Levin's.