Neutrino moon x-ray results from G.H.REES dated 1988 | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31676496 United Kingdom 01/07/2013 07:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31676496 United Kingdom 01/07/2013 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31676496 United Kingdom 01/07/2013 07:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2967850 Ireland 01/07/2013 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pray tell op What device could possibly read/image a nutrino source'the world awaits a new pardigim in particle pysics your's sarcasticly-a thick twat. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31676496 A neutrino detector is a physics apparatus designed to study neutrinos. Because neutrinos are only weakly interacting with other particles of matter, neutrino detectors must be very large in order to detect a significant number of neutrinos. Neutrino detectors are often built underground to isolate the detector from cosmic rays and other background radiation.[1] The field of neutrino astronomy is still very much in its infancy – the only confirmed extraterrestrial sources so far are the Sun and supernova SN1987A. Neutrino observatories will "give astronomers fresh eyes with which to study the universe."[2] [link to en.wikipedia.org] In 13 months of observing with the half-complete IceCube detector at the South Pole. [link to www.wired.com] IceCube, which was completed in December 2010 after a decade of construction, is an array of 5,160 such detectors arrayed more than a mile deep in Antarctic ice. Unlike earlier neutrino detectors, like Superkamiokande in Japan and SNO in Canada, IceCube is big enough to sense neutrinos with energies higher than a trillion electron volts, which are produced by the very highest-energy cosmic rays. If gamma-ray bursts are responsible for cosmic rays, IceCube should be able to tell. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22323395 United States 01/07/2013 07:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31676496 United Kingdom 01/07/2013 07:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pray tell op What device could possibly read/image a nutrino source'the world awaits a new pardigim in particle pysics your's sarcasticly-a thick twat. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31676496 Ps I love this site. It would have to be an image reader the size of the image X the square of the distance between the image and the reader. andan almost infinately dense object to be imaged to return a signal,by the time it arrived at the reader it would be totaly entrophic Therefore the answer would preceed the question. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31676496 United Kingdom 01/07/2013 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pray tell op What device could possibly read/image a nutrino source'the world awaits a new pardigim in particle pysics your's sarcasticly-a thick twat. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31676496 A neutrino detector is a physics apparatus designed to study neutrinos. Because neutrinos are only weakly interacting with other particles of matter, neutrino detectors must be very large in order to detect a significant number of neutrinos. Neutrino detectors are often built underground to isolate the detector from cosmic rays and other background radiation.[1] The field of neutrino astronomy is still very much in its infancy – the only confirmed extraterrestrial sources so far are the Sun and supernova SN1987A. Neutrino observatories will "give astronomers fresh eyes with which to study the universe."[2] [link to en.wikipedia.org] In 13 months of observing with the half-complete IceCube detector at the South Pole. [link to www.wired.com] IceCube, which was completed in December 2010 after a decade of construction, is an array of 5,160 such detectors arrayed more than a mile deep in Antarctic ice. Unlike earlier neutrino detectors, like Superkamiokande in Japan and SNO in Canada, IceCube is big enough to sense neutrinos with energies higher than a trillion electron volts, which are produced by the very highest-energy cosmic rays. If gamma-ray bursts are responsible for cosmic rays, IceCube should be able to tell. Answer apreciated but you are talking about a few in trillions of neutrinos that are allegedly created being detected-to image something would be a whole new ball game' |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31676496 United Kingdom 01/07/2013 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also I think that the ice detector relies on a photon flash from a decaying neutrino reaction with the ice detector but radioactive decay (in the detector)has to be factord in wich can only be assesed by a mathematical algorithm therefore is subject to human Imperfection. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2967850 Ireland 01/07/2013 07:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IceCube and the AMANDA project take advantage of this method on a much larger scale by using ice instead of water; to facilitate this both are constructed in Antarctica at the south pole, the only place to find a chunk of ice big enough! The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) uses heavy water. In addition to the neutrino interactions available in a regular water detector, the deuterium in the heavy water can be broken up by a neutrino. The resulting free neutron is subsequently captured, releasing a burst of gamma rays which are detected. All three neutrino flavors participate equally in this dissociation reaction. The MiniBooNE detector employs pure mineral oil as its detection medium. Mineral oil is a natural scintillator, so charged particles without sufficient energy to produce Cherenkov light can still produce scintillation light. This allows low energy muons and protons, invisible in water, to be detected. Tau leptons decay essentially immediately to either pions or another charged lepton, and can't be observed directly in this kind of detector. (To directly observe taus, one typically looks for a kink in tracks in photographic emulsion.) Most neutrino experiments must address the flux of cosmic rays that bombard the earth's surface. The higher energy (>50 MeV or so) neutrino experiments often cover or surround the primary detector with a "veto" detector which reveals when a cosmic ray passes into the primary detector, allowing the corresponding activity in the primary detector to be ignored ("vetoed"). [link to icecube.wisc.edu] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2967850 Ireland 01/07/2013 08:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also I think that the ice detector relies on a photon flash from a decaying neutrino reaction with the ice detector but radioactive decay (in the detector)has to be factord in wich can only be assesed by a mathematical algorithm therefore is subject to human Imperfection. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31676496 To those who do not know mathematics it is difficult to get across a real feeling as to the beauty, the deepest beauty, of nature ... If you want to learn about nature, to appreciate nature, it is necessary to understand the language that she speaks in. -Richard Feynman "Traditional logic is binary: either a proposition is true or it is false, either black or white. However, we live in a world of gray — or of even more colors. The advantage of binary logic is that it is relatively simple. The disadvantage is that it sometimes fails to match reality." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31676496 United Kingdom 01/07/2013 08:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Most neutrino experiments must address the flux of cosmic rays that bombard the earth's surface. The higher energy (>50 MeV or so) neutrino experiments often cover or surround the primary detector with a "veto" detector which reveals when a cosmic ray passes into the primary detector, allowing the corresponding activity in the primary detector to be ignored ("vetoed").That adresses my query about radioactive decay thank yoy fellow ac but back to the original thread to use neutrinos as an imageing device is almost beyong science fiction.Having said that I do beleive there is something not natural about the Moon ?. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31676496 United Kingdom 01/07/2013 08:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Most neutrino experiments must address the flux of cosmic rays that bombard the earth's surface. The higher energy (>50 MeV or so) neutrino experiments often cover or surround the primary detector with a "veto" detector which reveals when a cosmic ray passes into the primary detector, allowing the corresponding activity in the primary detector to be ignored ("vetoed").That adresses my query about radioactive decay thank yoy fellow ac but back to the original thread to use neutrinos as an imageing device is almost beyong science fiction.Having said that I do beleive there is something not natural about the Moon ?. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31676496 Sorry about the spelling blame the scotch... |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 31716829 Greece 01/07/2013 08:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2967850 Ireland 01/07/2013 08:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Most neutrino experiments must address the flux of cosmic rays that bombard the earth's surface. The higher energy (>50 MeV or so) neutrino experiments often cover or surround the primary detector with a "veto" detector which reveals when a cosmic ray passes into the primary detector, allowing the corresponding activity in the primary detector to be ignored ("vetoed").That adresses my query about radioactive decay thank yoy fellow ac but back to the original thread to use neutrinos as an imageing device is almost beyong science fiction.Having said that I do beleive there is something not natural about the Moon ?. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31676496 Most neutrino experiments must address the flux of cosmic rays that bombard the earth's surface. The higher energy (>50 MeV or so) neutrino experiments often cover or surround the primary detector with a "veto" detector which reveals when a cosmic ray passes into the primary detector, allowing the corresponding activity in the primary detector to be ignored ("vetoed").That adresses my query about radioactive decay thank yoy fellow ac but back to the original thread to use neutrinos as an imageing device is almost beyong science fiction.Having said that I do beleive there is something not natural about the Moon ?. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31676496 Sorry about the spelling blame the scotch... |
Blitz the storm-striker User ID: 31684112 Canada 01/07/2013 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This way they wont be able to run and control you. They will try to scare you in your dreams. But thats all they can do. Becasue they are fucked and they know it. Stella police is watching VEry close. Should they make the wrong move. To live is to believe in the power of dreams! To dream is to believe in the power of love! To love is to Know the truth! The Desire to Be fuel the belief that you Are which ignite the Will to Become which bring back forth the desire to be... Let it be-come you! It means Stop seeking your higher self! It is seeking you! Stand still in your mind to calm the waters of your mind and then it shall find you, so you can ride those waves together! your true self lies somewhere between your heart and your consciousness. It is called the heart consciousness,which is the creator, which is you! The heart create the emotions and our mind evoke its purpose, from which we dream the life we live in order to imagine the nature of reality and finally remember love! The highest Purpose of our mind is the ability to Forget! Go on and Forgive yourself! There is no love in truth but there is truth in love! Be authentic, nobody else can do it for you! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32954630 Greece 01/24/2013 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29224635 United States 01/24/2013 05:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33078584 Greece 01/26/2013 06:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |