Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,900 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,802,372
Pageviews Today: 2,403,724Threads Today: 607Posts Today: 12,031
07:28 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS

 
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 08:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
Well this is just peachy lol

[link to lasp.colorado.edu]
 Quoting: #Geomagnetic_Storm#


What's that???
 Quoting: Requiemdream (Ghost)


X-Ray output
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 08:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
[link to sidc.oma.be] 1652 beta-gamma.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31775728
United States
01/09/2013 08:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
About how much longer until the spots are earth facing?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31814453


They are earth facing right now, but not in a geoeffective position. That's probably what you meant. I would give it 5 days to be directly geoeffective.
 Quoting: #Geomagnetic_Storm#


Anytime GOES picks up a flare (ie these Cs) it is geoeffective and we get radiation here on Earth. It may not produce an Earth bound CME or geo effective storm, but if GOES picks it up, it is geo effective.

Take as look at the Global D absorption map.

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 08:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
They may be slightly geo-effective but that is irrelevant as they are not even directly Earth facing yet.
Tanos

User ID: 28279124
Spain
01/09/2013 08:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
An Irish Bookie PaddyPower are offering odds of 16/1 that 2013 has the largest geomagnetic storm on record.

What do you think? A good bet there?
The unexamined life is not worth living
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31775728
United States
01/09/2013 08:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
They may be slightly geo-effective but that is irrelevant as they are not even directly Earth facing yet.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Irrelevant ?? Ok. LOL
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 08:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
An Irish Bookie PaddyPower are offering odds of 16/1 that 2013 has the largest geomagnetic storm on record.

What do you think? A good bet there?
 Quoting: Tanos


Is that like a real online bet? Well. Statistically we're in solar maximum, and it's 2013, suns poles are due to flip anytime. I'd say it's a pretty safe bet. It wouldn't take a very strong storm to have the worst on record.
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 08:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
They may be slightly geo-effective but that is irrelevant as they are not even directly Earth facing yet.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Irrelevant ?? Ok. LOL
 Quoting: TS66


Meaning they are not affecting us so why bring it up.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31775728
United States
01/09/2013 08:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
They may be slightly geo-effective but that is irrelevant as they are not even directly Earth facing yet.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Irrelevant ?? Ok. LOL
 Quoting: TS66


Meaning they are not affecting us so why bring it up.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Of course they are, did you look at the map ???

I'm not arguing with you here, it is what it is ... hf

There's a difference between observable science and GLP doom wink
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23231420
United States
01/09/2013 08:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
They may be slightly geo-effective but that is irrelevant as they are not even directly Earth facing yet.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Irrelevant ?? Ok. LOL
 Quoting: TS66


Meaning they are not affecting us so why bring it up.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Of course they are, did you look at the map ???

I'm not arguing with you here, it is what it is ... hf

There's a difference between observable science and GLP doom wink
 Quoting: TS66


I love when people say geo-effective and irrelevant in the same sentence...

iamwith
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 08:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
They may be slightly geo-effective but that is irrelevant as they are not even directly Earth facing yet.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Irrelevant ?? Ok. LOL
 Quoting: TS66


Meaning they are not affecting us so why bring it up.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Of course they are, did you look at the map ???

I'm not arguing with you here, it is what it is ... hf

There's a difference between observable science and GLP doom wink
 Quoting: TS66


How is that small scale radiation affecting us in any way bro? Please enlighten me as to what negative effects we're seeing on earth right now due to that very small absorption.
Tanos

User ID: 28279124
Spain
01/09/2013 08:47 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
An Irish Bookie PaddyPower are offering odds of 16/1 that 2013 has the largest geomagnetic storm on record.

What do you think? A good bet there?
 Quoting: Tanos


Is that like a real online bet? Well. Statistically we're in solar maximum, and it's 2013, suns poles are due to flip anytime. I'd say it's a pretty safe bet. It wouldn't take a very strong storm to have the worst on record.
 Quoting: aliensbro

Yeah one of the biggest bookies in the UK. Hugely popular.

8/1 that the UK national grid shuts down for a day or more too in 2013.

Thats what I thought, looking at it from a purely statistical standpoint with the information around currently, 16/1 seems a nonsense price. But I'm far from a registered Suntard so thought I'd put word out first and see what I got back.

Thanks!
The unexamined life is not worth living
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 08:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
...


Irrelevant ?? Ok. LOL
 Quoting: TS66


Meaning they are not affecting us so why bring it up.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Of course they are, did you look at the map ???

I'm not arguing with you here, it is what it is ... hf

There's a difference between observable science and GLP doom wink
 Quoting: TS66


I love when people say geo-effective and irrelevant in the same sentence...

iamwith
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23231420


We're at minimal geo effectiveness right now people, there are no affects being perceived from this. They are technically geo-effective, and will increase and become more geo effective as they rotate around. Given their current position they aren't really affecting us. I doubt we even had a transformer blow.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31775728
United States
01/09/2013 08:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
What effects do radiation have ???

Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of.
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 08:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
An Irish Bookie PaddyPower are offering odds of 16/1 that 2013 has the largest geomagnetic storm on record.

What do you think? A good bet there?
 Quoting: Tanos


Is that like a real online bet? Well. Statistically we're in solar maximum, and it's 2013, suns poles are due to flip anytime. I'd say it's a pretty safe bet. It wouldn't take a very strong storm to have the worst on record.
 Quoting: aliensbro

Yeah one of the biggest bookies in the UK. Hugely popular.

8/1 that the UK national grid shuts down for a day or more too in 2013.

Thats what I thought, looking at it from a purely statistical standpoint with the information around currently, 16/1 seems a nonsense price. But I'm far from a registered Suntard so thought I'd put word out first and see what I got back.

Thanks!
 Quoting: Tanos


At 16/1 shit even if you lost you could've just bet $100 and it would be worth it. Then there's always that chance though.
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 08:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
What effects do radiation have ???

Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of.
 Quoting: TS66


And i'm reinforcing his statement that they are non geo effective. Small scale radiation like what you have shown here have just about no noticeable effects, other than that you may get a reading on some meter.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31775728
United States
01/09/2013 08:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
What effects do radiation have ???

Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of.
 Quoting: TS66


And i'm reinforcing his statement that they are non geo effective. Small scale radiation like what you have shown here have just about no noticeable effects, other than that you may get a reading on some meter.
 Quoting: aliensbro


No, no transformers will blow, and that wasn't my point. You are an unpleasant fellow without a clue, nor are you looking for one.

Carry on, your readers await oh magnificent one blink
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 09:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
What effects do radiation have ???

Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of.
 Quoting: TS66


And i'm reinforcing his statement that they are non geo effective. Small scale radiation like what you have shown here have just about no noticeable effects, other than that you may get a reading on some meter.
 Quoting: aliensbro


No, no transformers will blow, and that wasn't my point. You are an unpleasant fellow without a clue, nor are you looking for one.

Carry on, your readers await oh magnificent one blink
 Quoting: TS66


I'm simply trying to understand the relevance of what you posted.. How is it relevant? I am not attacking you i'm asking you. Clearly you cannot provide a good response or you would've done so.
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 09:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
The sky is blue.. See I can post useless shit too.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31775728
United States
01/09/2013 09:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
About how much longer until the spots are earth facing?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31814453


They are earth facing right now, but not in a geoeffective position. That's probably what you meant. I would give it 5 days to be directly geoeffective.
 Quoting: #Geomagnetic_Storm#


Anytime GOES picks up a flare (ie these Cs) it is geoeffective and we get radiation here on Earth. It may not produce an Earth bound CME or geo effective storm, but if GOES picks it up, it is geo effective.

Take as look at the Global D absorption map.

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]
 Quoting: TS66


What effects do radiation have ???

Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of.
 Quoting: TS66


And i'm reinforcing his statement that they are non geo effective. Small scale radiation like what you have shown here have just about no noticeable effects, other than that you may get a reading on some meter.
 Quoting: aliensbro


No, no transformers will blow, and that wasn't my point. You are an unpleasant fellow without a clue, nor are you looking for one.

Carry on, your readers await oh magnificent one blink
 Quoting: TS66


I'm simply trying to understand the relevance of what you posted.. How is it relevant? I am not attacking you i'm asking you. Clearly you cannot provide a good response or you would've done so.
 Quoting: aliensbro
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 09:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
So your arguing symantics for the fact that they are technically considered geo-effective. Good point.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31775728
United States
01/09/2013 09:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
So your arguing symantics for the fact that they are technically considered geo-effective. Good point.
 Quoting: aliensbro


I am arguing that in fact it IS in a geo effective POSITION simply for the fact [/b radiation is being picked up by a chart that records radiation out put, GOES. Ergo if GOES can pick up an increase in radiation, it is in fact in a geo effective position and if there were a flare and resulting CME that would also be geo effective. Get it ???

It was simple statement of fact that you have blown out of proportion.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23231420
United States
01/09/2013 09:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
What effects do radiation have ???

Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of.
 Quoting: TS66


And i'm reinforcing his statement that they are non geo effective. Small scale radiation like what you have shown here have just about no noticeable effects, other than that you may get a reading on some meter.
 Quoting: aliensbro


We use those small readings to analyze future outcomes of solar events. They are the first response systems that indicate threats such as incoming geo-magnetic storms. everything that is geo-effective, earth directed or not is quite significant.
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 09:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
I mean I don't see it as highly important but I guess it doesn't hurt to have that information here as well, I'm not a suntard and more than likely just don't understand the importance of small scale readings like above. Didn't mean to attack you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23231420
United States
01/09/2013 09:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
So your arguing symantics for the fact that they are technically considered geo-effective. Good point.
 Quoting: aliensbro


I am arguing that in fact it IS in a geo effective POSITION simply for the fact [/b radiation is being picked up by a chart that records radiation out put, GOES. Ergo if GOES can pick up an increase in radiation, it is in fact in a geo effective position and if there were a flare and resulting CME that would also be geo effective. Get it ???

It was simple statement of fact that you have blown out of proportion.
 Quoting: TS66


p.s. @ts66
I don't have an account.
If I did I would friend request you.
You provide very accurate information and logic driven responses. Chinwags with people of your caliper are often too few and far in between...
kudos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31775728
United States
01/09/2013 09:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
So your arguing symantics for the fact that they are technically considered geo-effective. Good point.
 Quoting: aliensbro


I am arguing that in fact it IS in a geo effective POSITION simply for the fact [/b radiation is being picked up by a chart that records radiation out put, GOES. Ergo if GOES can pick up an increase in radiation, it is in fact in a geo effective position and if there were a flare and resulting CME that would also be geo effective. Get it ???

It was simple statement of fact that you have blown out of proportion.
 Quoting: TS66


p.s. @ts66
I don't have an account.
If I did I would friend request you.
You provide very accurate information and logic driven responses. Chinwags with people of your caliper are often too few and far in between...
kudos.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23231420


hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23231420
United States
01/09/2013 09:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
So your arguing symantics for the fact that they are technically considered geo-effective. Good point.
 Quoting: aliensbro


I am arguing that in fact it IS in a geo effective POSITION simply for the fact [/b radiation is being picked up by a chart that records radiation out put, GOES. Ergo if GOES can pick up an increase in radiation, it is in fact in a geo effective position and if there were a flare and resulting CME that would also be geo effective. Get it ???

It was simple statement of fact that you have blown out of proportion.
 Quoting: TS66


p.s. @ts66
I don't have an account.
If I did I would friend request you.
You provide very accurate information and logic driven responses. Chinwags with people of your caliper are often too few and far in between...
kudos.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23231420


hf
 Quoting: TS66


tounge
1908247

User ID: 31821537
Brazil
01/09/2013 09:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
I'm sorry, but I felt like doing this, page 13 calls.


I am not attacking you i'm asking you.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Clearly you cannot provide a good response or you would've done so.
 Quoting: aliensbro


The sky is blue.. See I can post useless shit too.
 Quoting: aliensbro



Didn't mean to attack you.
 Quoting: aliensbro



If you want to watch the video (:





Now back to the sun. BACK TO THE FUTUUREE

dont mind me
- ? Nus.

-You Hold Witness I Witness

As if he could, by himself, say:
_Alive, therefore life itself.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23231420
United States
01/09/2013 09:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
I'm sorry, but I felt like doing this, page 13 calls.


I am not attacking you i'm asking you.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Clearly you cannot provide a good response or you would've done so.
 Quoting: aliensbro


The sky is blue.. See I can post useless shit too.
 Quoting: aliensbro



Didn't mean to attack you.
 Quoting: aliensbro



If you want to watch the video (:





Now back to the sun. BACK TO THE FUTUUREE

dont mind me
 Quoting: 1908247


You only get stronger by fighting a better opponent.
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/09/2013 09:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS
I'm sorry, but I felt like doing this, page 13 calls.


I am not attacking you i'm asking you.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Clearly you cannot provide a good response or you would've done so.
 Quoting: aliensbro


The sky is blue.. See I can post useless shit too.
 Quoting: aliensbro



Didn't mean to attack you.
 Quoting: aliensbro



If you want to watch the video (:





Now back to the sun. BACK TO THE FUTUUREE

dont mind me
 Quoting: 1908247


Lol kudos for the collection of my asshole statements.

News