Not one but two HUGE SUNSPOTS | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 08:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to sidc.oma.be] 1652 beta-gamma. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31775728 United States 01/09/2013 08:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They are earth facing right now, but not in a geoeffective position. That's probably what you meant. I would give it 5 days to be directly geoeffective. Anytime GOES picks up a flare (ie these Cs) it is geoeffective and we get radiation here on Earth. It may not produce an Earth bound CME or geo effective storm, but if GOES picks it up, it is geo effective. Take as look at the Global D absorption map. [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 08:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Tanos User ID: 28279124 Spain 01/09/2013 08:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31775728 United States 01/09/2013 08:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 08:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | An Irish Bookie PaddyPower are offering odds of 16/1 that 2013 has the largest geomagnetic storm on record. Quoting: Tanos What do you think? A good bet there? Is that like a real online bet? Well. Statistically we're in solar maximum, and it's 2013, suns poles are due to flip anytime. I'd say it's a pretty safe bet. It wouldn't take a very strong storm to have the worst on record. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 08:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31775728 United States 01/09/2013 08:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They may be slightly geo-effective but that is irrelevant as they are not even directly Earth facing yet. Quoting: aliensbro Irrelevant ?? Ok. LOL Meaning they are not affecting us so why bring it up. Of course they are, did you look at the map ??? I'm not arguing with you here, it is what it is ... There's a difference between observable science and GLP doom |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23231420 United States 01/09/2013 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They may be slightly geo-effective but that is irrelevant as they are not even directly Earth facing yet. Quoting: aliensbro Irrelevant ?? Ok. LOL Meaning they are not affecting us so why bring it up. Of course they are, did you look at the map ??? I'm not arguing with you here, it is what it is ... There's a difference between observable science and GLP doom I love when people say geo-effective and irrelevant in the same sentence... |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They may be slightly geo-effective but that is irrelevant as they are not even directly Earth facing yet. Quoting: aliensbro Irrelevant ?? Ok. LOL Meaning they are not affecting us so why bring it up. Of course they are, did you look at the map ??? I'm not arguing with you here, it is what it is ... There's a difference between observable science and GLP doom How is that small scale radiation affecting us in any way bro? Please enlighten me as to what negative effects we're seeing on earth right now due to that very small absorption. |
Tanos User ID: 28279124 Spain 01/09/2013 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | An Irish Bookie PaddyPower are offering odds of 16/1 that 2013 has the largest geomagnetic storm on record. Quoting: Tanos What do you think? A good bet there? Is that like a real online bet? Well. Statistically we're in solar maximum, and it's 2013, suns poles are due to flip anytime. I'd say it's a pretty safe bet. It wouldn't take a very strong storm to have the worst on record. Yeah one of the biggest bookies in the UK. Hugely popular. 8/1 that the UK national grid shuts down for a day or more too in 2013. Thats what I thought, looking at it from a purely statistical standpoint with the information around currently, 16/1 seems a nonsense price. But I'm far from a registered Suntard so thought I'd put word out first and see what I got back. Thanks! The unexamined life is not worth living |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Of course they are, did you look at the map ??? I'm not arguing with you here, it is what it is ... There's a difference between observable science and GLP doom I love when people say geo-effective and irrelevant in the same sentence... We're at minimal geo effectiveness right now people, there are no affects being perceived from this. They are technically geo-effective, and will increase and become more geo effective as they rotate around. Given their current position they aren't really affecting us. I doubt we even had a transformer blow. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31775728 United States 01/09/2013 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | An Irish Bookie PaddyPower are offering odds of 16/1 that 2013 has the largest geomagnetic storm on record. Quoting: Tanos What do you think? A good bet there? Is that like a real online bet? Well. Statistically we're in solar maximum, and it's 2013, suns poles are due to flip anytime. I'd say it's a pretty safe bet. It wouldn't take a very strong storm to have the worst on record. Yeah one of the biggest bookies in the UK. Hugely popular. 8/1 that the UK national grid shuts down for a day or more too in 2013. Thats what I thought, looking at it from a purely statistical standpoint with the information around currently, 16/1 seems a nonsense price. But I'm far from a registered Suntard so thought I'd put word out first and see what I got back. Thanks! At 16/1 shit even if you lost you could've just bet $100 and it would be worth it. Then there's always that chance though. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 08:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What effects do radiation have ??? Quoting: TS66 Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of. And i'm reinforcing his statement that they are non geo effective. Small scale radiation like what you have shown here have just about no noticeable effects, other than that you may get a reading on some meter. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31775728 United States 01/09/2013 08:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What effects do radiation have ??? Quoting: TS66 Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of. And i'm reinforcing his statement that they are non geo effective. Small scale radiation like what you have shown here have just about no noticeable effects, other than that you may get a reading on some meter. No, no transformers will blow, and that wasn't my point. You are an unpleasant fellow without a clue, nor are you looking for one. Carry on, your readers await oh magnificent one |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 09:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What effects do radiation have ??? Quoting: TS66 Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of. And i'm reinforcing his statement that they are non geo effective. Small scale radiation like what you have shown here have just about no noticeable effects, other than that you may get a reading on some meter. No, no transformers will blow, and that wasn't my point. You are an unpleasant fellow without a clue, nor are you looking for one. Carry on, your readers await oh magnificent one I'm simply trying to understand the relevance of what you posted.. How is it relevant? I am not attacking you i'm asking you. Clearly you cannot provide a good response or you would've done so. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 09:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31775728 United States 01/09/2013 09:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They are earth facing right now, but not in a geoeffective position. That's probably what you meant. I would give it 5 days to be directly geoeffective. Anytime GOES picks up a flare (ie these Cs) it is geoeffective and we get radiation here on Earth. It may not produce an Earth bound CME or geo effective storm, but if GOES picks it up, it is geo effective. Take as look at the Global D absorption map. [link to www.swpc.noaa.gov] What effects do radiation have ??? Quoting: TS66 Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of. And i'm reinforcing his statement that they are non geo effective. Small scale radiation like what you have shown here have just about no noticeable effects, other than that you may get a reading on some meter. No, no transformers will blow, and that wasn't my point. You are an unpleasant fellow without a clue, nor are you looking for one. Carry on, your readers await oh magnificent one I'm simply trying to understand the relevance of what you posted.. How is it relevant? I am not attacking you i'm asking you. Clearly you cannot provide a good response or you would've done so. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 09:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31775728 United States 01/09/2013 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So your arguing symantics for the fact that they are technically considered geo-effective. Good point. Quoting: aliensbro I am arguing that in fact it IS in a geo effective POSITION simply for the fact [/b radiation is being picked up by a chart that records radiation out put, GOES. Ergo if GOES can pick up an increase in radiation, it is in fact in a geo effective position and if there were a flare and resulting CME that would also be geo effective. Get it ??? It was simple statement of fact that you have blown out of proportion. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23231420 United States 01/09/2013 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What effects do radiation have ??? Quoting: TS66 Relax no one is putting you on the spot here, I was responding to Gs's statement of being non geo effective, not your lack of. And i'm reinforcing his statement that they are non geo effective. Small scale radiation like what you have shown here have just about no noticeable effects, other than that you may get a reading on some meter. We use those small readings to analyze future outcomes of solar events. They are the first response systems that indicate threats such as incoming geo-magnetic storms. everything that is geo-effective, earth directed or not is quite significant. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 09:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23231420 United States 01/09/2013 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So your arguing symantics for the fact that they are technically considered geo-effective. Good point. Quoting: aliensbro I am arguing that in fact it IS in a geo effective POSITION simply for the fact [/b radiation is being picked up by a chart that records radiation out put, GOES. Ergo if GOES can pick up an increase in radiation, it is in fact in a geo effective position and if there were a flare and resulting CME that would also be geo effective. Get it ??? It was simple statement of fact that you have blown out of proportion. p.s. @ts66 I don't have an account. If I did I would friend request you. You provide very accurate information and logic driven responses. Chinwags with people of your caliper are often too few and far in between... kudos. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31775728 United States 01/09/2013 09:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So your arguing symantics for the fact that they are technically considered geo-effective. Good point. Quoting: aliensbro I am arguing that in fact it IS in a geo effective POSITION simply for the fact [/b radiation is being picked up by a chart that records radiation out put, GOES. Ergo if GOES can pick up an increase in radiation, it is in fact in a geo effective position and if there were a flare and resulting CME that would also be geo effective. Get it ??? It was simple statement of fact that you have blown out of proportion. p.s. @ts66 I don't have an account. If I did I would friend request you. You provide very accurate information and logic driven responses. Chinwags with people of your caliper are often too few and far in between... kudos. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23231420 United States 01/09/2013 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So your arguing symantics for the fact that they are technically considered geo-effective. Good point. Quoting: aliensbro I am arguing that in fact it IS in a geo effective POSITION simply for the fact [/b radiation is being picked up by a chart that records radiation out put, GOES. Ergo if GOES can pick up an increase in radiation, it is in fact in a geo effective position and if there were a flare and resulting CME that would also be geo effective. Get it ??? It was simple statement of fact that you have blown out of proportion. p.s. @ts66 I don't have an account. If I did I would friend request you. You provide very accurate information and logic driven responses. Chinwags with people of your caliper are often too few and far in between... kudos. |
1908247 User ID: 31821537 Brazil 01/09/2013 09:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm sorry, but I felt like doing this, page 13 calls. If you want to watch the video (: Now back to the sun. BACK TO THE FUTUUREE dont mind me Nus |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23231420 United States 01/09/2013 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/09/2013 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |