Another liberal RAG publishes lists of MORE gun owners - Calls gun owners 'Assholes'

That should make all the current and retired police, corrections, and security personnel very happy.

That's really elevating the discussion...

Here they call us names, but I bet they would have cried foul if AIex J0nes had taken out his Johnson and dick slapped Piers Morgan in his oversized mellon...

People have gotten so thin skinned...

Last Edited by Saddletramp on 01/08/2013 08:40 PM

What? I happen to agree. Publish the staff addresses if they're going to pull this shit. Read the Fox article below and you'll see how they just made many criminals very happy.

Turnaround is fair play. Let's see them hire armed guards to protect themselves and we can laugh at the hypocrisy.


Ex-Burglars Say Newspaper’s Gun Map Would’ve Made the Job Easier, Safer

"Frank Abagnale, who was portrayed by Leonardo DiCaprio in the 2002 film “Catch Me if You Can,” and is perhaps the most famous reformed thief to ever earn a legitimate living by offering the public insight into the criminal mind, called the newspaper’s actions “reprehensible.”

“It is unbelievable that a newspaper or so called journalist would publish the names and addresses of legal gun owners, including federal agents, law enforcement officers and the like,” said Abagnale, who noted that he grew up in the suburban New York area served by the Journal-News. “This would be equivalent to publishing the names of individuals who keep substantial sums of money, jewelry and valuables in their home.”

[link to www.foxnews.com]

A couple from the NYT...

"After Pinpointing Gun Owners, Paper Is a Target" - [link to www.nytimes.com]

Newspaper That Put Gun Permit Map Online Hires Armed Guards - [link to www.nytimes.com]

Outcry Over Newspaper’s Map of Handgun Permit Holders - [link to cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com]

Their actions are dangerous and could be potentially deadly.
If they publish the addresses of women who are in hiding from estranged husbands, things could get ugly real fast.

I would hold the employees personally responsible if something would happen to a family member of mine due to their "tasteless" actions. Legal or not.

Does anyone have a phone number / email address of this asshole?

Yea it's all over the place already. Hahahah check the comments in the original link.

Looking at some of the comments infuriates me. I'm thinking that we, as Parents should start asking some pointed questions of the Parents that our children spend time with, I mean, If those Parents are going to fill my kids heads with propaganda about guns and that we need to 'do away' with the second, or any amendment for that matter, I don't want them around my children.
AND, seeing as how a lot of teachers are liberal leaning, then maybe they shouldn't be teaching at all. Seriously, if they are, in their position of Authority over our children, filling their minds with why we need to 'get rid of guns', instead of teaching them how important Our Constitution is, then they, or any adult in any positions of authority over children, should not be allowed to posses that position. Turn about really is fair play, so, if these folks wish to state that they 'need' to know who has guns at the houses of where their children play, then I have every reason to also ask about their political leanings, especially since they do not posses the equipment, nor the skills, to protect my child while they are visiting.

And this from the comments section:

So what's next on the Journal's agenda, the public sharing of vehicle registration info? Should owners of nice cars start worrying about some whacko writing down their license plate numbers and tracking them to their homes in the middle of the night? Can't wait to hear Mr. Worley on this one: "The people have as much of a right to know who owns a Mercedes C300 in their communities as C300 owners have to own their expensive vehicles." How would that go over with the average law-abiding luxury car owner?


Seriously, what is next? There is already a war against the rich, what if some rag publishes the list above? Wonder how that would turn out.

Any time any liberal maggot calls you an asshole, consider it a blessing.

I still think AIex J0nes should have pulled out his Johnson and dick whipped Piers Morgan about his huge English Mellon...

You wanna talk ratings baby! That would have gotten ratings!!!

Last Edited by Saddletramp on 01/08/2013 09:45 PM

Thanks

His voicemails full

so now all the crominals will know who doesn't have guns. those without guns will be easy targets.

Such a convenient distraction for these no good bastards when we should be auditing the criminally zionist controlled federal reserve bank. Expel them and send them to Israel, Ashkezar, or whatever other country they wish to morally, ethically, physically, spiritually, and financially bacnkrupt and ruin.

Here's the asshole newspaper's response to the publishing of the names:

Debate must span all guns, issues

Public means public
Under New York’s firearms statute, “The name and address of any person to whom an application for any license has been granted shall be a public record.” The meaning of this provision already has been vetted in the courts. In the early 1980s, The Wall Street Journal successfully sued New York City for access to firearms records. In finding for the newspaper, the state’s highest court rejected arguments that publication of the information could endanger gun owners. “There is no indication that the publication led to any harm or jeopardy,” Robert Freeman, executive director of the state Committee on Open Government, recently told the Poughkeepsie Journal. “I don’t think there is anything pejorative about (being named on a gun-permit list).”

Robert Freeman, executive director of the state Committee on Open Government - Idiot in favor of publishing the addresses

[link to www.lohud.com]

They can all go to hell.

Hey, Anonymous Canadian you wanna get a grip?
You are embarrassing me. (Are you even a Canadian?)

The use of derogatory names to denigrate the opposition is Propaganda in its very basest form.
Conjures up visions of WW1 propaganda posters that whipped up hatred by dehumanizing and in the next sentence, suggests killing the portrayed.
Publishing the names is absolutely deplorable, and dangerous for those identified owners as well as the ones without any guns in their homes. It was the randomness that made it work. Well the non owners now have big targets painted on their doors.

Peace, Love or War, Anonymous Canadian, what do you want?

Last Edited by PeaceLove&War on 01/08/2013 10:12 PM

Not on the "list".. i already checked.. they are exempt.

schumer and bloomburg are both missing from the list, funny that.

Do these assholes not realize they're making it more likely for THEM to be robbed? Criminals now have a list of what homes to avoid.

So it's "legitimate" to own a gun to protect a celebrity or some shit head banker, but not to protect yourself and your family?

Fucking Libs...

Maybe there will be a posted list of all the liberals. heh

I can't wait until this backfires and the people publishing these tasteless articles get their homes ransacked.

They might as well put a sign in their lawn that says "help yourself to my free shit."

I am so glad it has come down to the liberal media putting themselves in a position they are extremely vulnerable. Does anyone think they mind if someone knows they own a gun? How halarious! There are one hell of alot more gun owners who could give a damn less about anyone knowing them than there are liberal nazi panti wasted lunatics who are supposidly in the media. HAHAHA.. this is going to get real interesting .. fun to watch!

OP

I meant to tell you earlier, but had an appt

Rockland County is home to many of NYC borough Police officers and families

Also home to the Hassidim Jews, notably many who work in the diamond district....see New City etc

Those groups are all pretty conservative, and armed

One of these days these OWS types are going to cross the line

I left NYC years ago, now live in Texas, I would *love* to see them try to pull that crap down here

lol

NOT A LIBERAL RAG BUT A JEWISH RAG.

yup

parasites are the first ones to call for armed guards to protect them if an ex employee even looks at them funny

but good gracious, if the working people of the US believe they have the same rights to self protection, they must be "rednecks" which is a classic form of dehumanizing someone

categorize >> dehumanize >> dismiss >> deny them rights

If true...that means they are building a list of every legit owner out there.

Something wicked this way comes.

Are we allowed to shoot these people in self defense because they're endangering our lives with this list? Basically they're asking people to kill us.