Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,128 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 577,496
Pageviews Today: 831,558Threads Today: 207Posts Today: 4,262
08:39 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.

 
tandym

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 08:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
I think there is much more to Sandy Hook than meets the eye, but I am having a hard time believing that all of these 'Sandy Hook' elements coming to light now (United Way, Vimeo, etc) having the wrong dates on them is actually 'valid'.

Someone is having fun at our expense.

Try it for yourself...

Go to Google
Type in 'Sandy Hook Tragedy'
Click Search
When the list comes back , at the top of the page just under the logo/search bar, choose Search Tools
Click the triangle next to 'Any Duration' and scroll down to choose 'Custom Range'
When the box pops up, use the << Next to January 2013 to scroll backwards in time. Pick any day you like.... Heck, pick January 1st, 2012!
Choose this date for both the From & To dates of your search.
Click Go.

Behold -- Sandy Hook Tragedy has results even for January 2012.

I don't buy it. Someone jacked with the search in Google -- or else, their search NEVER worked the way we 'thought' it did.

Just ANOTHER way for them to manipulate us. To get us to think that we can *trust* whatever Google gives us -- when in reality the results are staged just like everything else.

Computer Code does exactly what you tell it to do. Someone told Google's Search algorithm to report results that don't make sense.

Last Edited by tandym on 01/08/2013 08:22 PM
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 08:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Here's my January 1, 2012 search results...

[link to www.google.com (secure)]
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 08:22 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
bump
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 08:24 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
January 1st, 2011....

[link to www.google.com (secure)]
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 08:24 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Thread: This Sandy Hook Vimeo Video Was Uploaded 4 MONTHS Prior to shooting.

I wonder if the vimeo search has the same weirdness...

Last Edited by tandym on 01/08/2013 08:25 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27338393
United States
01/08/2013 08:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
didnt the shooting happen on dec 14? [link to en.wikipedia.org]


then goto gool and type in with quotes "sandy hook tragedy" then goto search tools and put in from dec 1 to dec 13 and alot of articles are posted before it even happened...
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 08:27 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
bump
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 08:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
didnt the shooting happen on dec 14? [link to en.wikipedia.org]


then goto gool and type in with quotes "sandy hook tragedy" then goto search tools and put in from dec 1 to dec 13 and alot of articles are posted before it even happened...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27338393


That's what I am saying. The search is fooked since you can input dates from January 1st, 2011 and get results.

Which means that we have to automatically throw out all google results as tainted.

Last Edited by tandym on 01/08/2013 08:28 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27338393
United States
01/08/2013 08:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
check the date at this article: [link to palmerchurch.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11311976
United States
01/08/2013 08:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
I typed it in for 2005 - got all kinds of results... typed in 2000 - got nothing... when was google started I wonder? I never knew that's how google worked... wonder if all search engines do? Thanks OP!
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 08:32 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Yeah -- but this can be manipulated from within the blog software -- its *easy* to do.

So at this point I am thinking that there is a group of hackers out there (that work for the darkside) that are DELIBERATELY falsifying dates on purpose... to OBFUSCATE so that those original *weird* items, that came to light within the first few days of the tragedy, get buried in the nonsense & noise. So that we conspiracy theorists will once again be ignored & laughed off ... its not hard at all to fool the pre-programmed people.
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 08:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
All they need to do now is have talking heads on CNN announce that there is a glitch in Google's search engine that is causing a kerfluffle on the interwebs -- and that people are saying the Sandy Hook entries are from prior to the event -- and voila -- everyone, and I mean *everyone* but us, will immediately buy it and go back to sleep.

And that one small mention on CNN will be powerful enough to get the people to ignore the REST of the mounting body of evidence as more of the same jibber jabber -- 'google glitch' etc.

Last Edited by tandym on 01/08/2013 08:35 PM
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 08:37 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1461405
United States
01/08/2013 08:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Try this search - wow:
[link to www.google.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6622655
United States
01/08/2013 09:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
It's changed, and I noticed this a few weeks ago.

Something I used to do, whenever any news-worthy event happened, that I suspected was somehow manipulated, or false

I would research about it, using dates that predated the events. Often very interesting data emerged that would link up political or financial motives, for example.

Now Google search doesn't work this way- at least not with current news items I have tried

I think it's deliberate, for the obvious reasons. They are controlling the data. They don't want us to see how the dots connect, what are the leads ups to these events, who benefits, or how they change the stories.

Google has shown their true motives, it's to control data.
GladioDaddy-O

User ID: 22439147
United States
01/08/2013 09:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
All they need to do now is have talking heads on CNN announce that there is a glitch in Google's search engine that is causing a kerfluffle on the interwebs -- and that people are saying the Sandy Hook entries are from prior to the event -- and voila -- everyone, and I mean *everyone* but us, will immediately buy it and go back to sleep.

And that one small mention on CNN will be powerful enough to get the people to ignore the REST of the mounting body of evidence as more of the same jibber jabber -- 'google glitch' etc.
 Quoting: tandym


I think it's a deliberate disinfo tactic to derail Sandy Hook skepticism.

But there are so many things beyond internet time stamps that don't add up.

Among the many things about Sandy Hook and Adam Lanza that don't make sense to me is the actual shooting part of it.

Certain witnesses reported hearing "hundreds of rounds" fired. Authorities said he had hundreds of rounds on him.

The coroner said each victim had at least three shots each. He further stated that the victims were shot w/ the "long gun," presumably the Bushmaster 223 SEMI-automatic, which means he would have had to pull the trigger for each shot fired.

So the "rail-thin", autistic kid, armed w/ two pistols, a rifle, magazines w/ hundreds of rounds, vest, mask(?), shot through the window to get in, climbed in, killed people in the hallway, killed all but one child in Rousseau's room, went to Soto's room, killed two teachers and six kids.

26 victims x at least three shots each =78 shots that HIT, not counting however many misses. 78+ pulls of the trigger
TruthNow88

User ID: 28724521
Canada
01/08/2013 09:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
All they need to do now is have talking heads on CNN announce that there is a glitch in Google's search engine that is causing a kerfluffle on the interwebs -- and that people are saying the Sandy Hook entries are from prior to the event -- and voila -- everyone, and I mean *everyone* but us, will immediately buy it and go back to sleep.

And that one small mention on CNN will be powerful enough to get the people to ignore the REST of the mounting body of evidence as more of the same jibber jabber -- 'google glitch' etc.
 Quoting: tandym


I think it's a deliberate disinfo tactic to derail Sandy Hook skepticism.

But there are so many things beyond internet time stamps that don't add up.

Among the many things about Sandy Hook and Adam Lanza that don't make sense to me is the actual shooting part of it.

Certain witnesses reported hearing "hundreds of rounds" fired. Authorities said he had hundreds of rounds on him.

The coroner said each victim had at least three shots each. He further stated that the victims were shot w/ the "long gun," presumably the Bushmaster 223 SEMI-automatic, which means he would have had to pull the trigger for each shot fired.

So the "rail-thin", autistic kid, armed w/ two pistols, a rifle, magazines w/ hundreds of rounds, vest, mask(?), shot through the window to get in, climbed in, killed people in the hallway, killed all but one child in Rousseau's room, went to Soto's room, killed two teachers and six kids.

26 victims x at least three shots each =78 shots that HIT, not counting however many misses. 78+ pulls of the trigger
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


I agree... people focusing on these timestamps are wasting their time. People really need to learn how Google Timestamps work with dynamic (changed after the fact) pages. The Google Timestamp, and the snippit of content do not sync up (time wise). The fact that a page for example says Feb 2012, and has sandy hook info simply means that page was crawled, and updated in the index on that day but that DOESN'T mean that content was there at that time. The content of the page can be changed after the fact and the timestamp of the crawl (based on your custom range) would not change. Basically the timestamp and the snippit are not necessarily synced up (the timestamp is static IF you enter a custom date, while the snippit always dynamic and will simply load the CURRENT content found on that page NOW).


And GladioDaddy-O I think the main reason for the contradictions / impossibilities in the Sandy Hook story are because there were actually 2 events that day.
1 fake non-event at the actual Elementary School
1 realistic DHS/FEMA simulation nearby

After both events were complete all participants of the drill (which have 1 eyewitness variation), and the students/staff from the actual school (a different eyewitness variation) BOTH groups met up at the same firehouse near Sandy Hook. Half the people were from the actual school and would have very limited details and eyewitness accounts of their event (i heard a noise and then cops got us out), the other half were people from the nearby drill which would have a lot more specific details about their event (hundreds of shots fired, what weapons were used, personal encounters with the gunman, step by step breakdowns). This is because half the people were involved in 1 event at the school where they heard a bit of noise over the intercom and then were evacuated, while the other half just did a realistic DHS active-shooter drill simulating a school (and involved children), and have detailed specifics of there event due to that. This is why you will hear 2 similar yet different sides to every aspect of this event (the majority of the details tend to usually be on the drill side, while the actual school details are much more vague).

For example when 1 person is interviewed and says it sounded like someone knocking on a door or had dropped something that was someone from the actual non-event in the school, while another person minute later is interviewed and says they heard hundreds of shots they are referring to the realistic drill that was being held nearby, they are actually both telling the truth in a sense... what they (or the MSM) aren't telling you is they are actually referring to 2 different events (both of which are completely fake) but passing all the info off as 1 single real event (Sandy Hook).

Last Edited by TruthNow88 on 01/08/2013 09:55 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31783724
Canada
01/08/2013 09:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
It's changed, and I noticed this a few weeks ago.

Something I used to do, whenever any news-worthy event happened, that I suspected was somehow manipulated, or false

I would research about it, using dates that predated the events. Often very interesting data emerged that would link up political or financial motives, for example.

Now Google search doesn't work this way- at least not with current news items I have tried

I think it's deliberate, for the obvious reasons. They are controlling the data. They don't want us to see how the dots connect, what are the leads ups to these events, who benefits, or how they change the stories.

Google has shown their true motives, it's to control data.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6622655


I used to use another search engine when I had a PC and it was the best ever for really going back and connecting the dots.

Then I changed to Mac and it wasn't compatible.

Remember Webferret?
amplified2

User ID: 2769657
Philippines
01/08/2013 09:31 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
The pages were created before the event happened.. often times blogs and news pages are created then page is renamed and a new article is inserted.

you can find dated info for 1812.. that doesn't mean the article was posted online in 1812
MCB

User ID: 26816346
United States
01/08/2013 10:33 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
OP - excellent thread...

I was wondering about this as well. Never trusted Google.

All that is necessary to create confusion is to sabotage the metadata... Irreconcilable ambiguity.

There must be some code that generates spam-bearing "news" to order so that it can flood the searches with ads...

Good luck figuring this out.

MCB
To measure a circle - start anywhere... Charles Fort

Total Choas!

Belief is the enemy - John Keel

Is it a coincidence that right there in the middle of the word "believe" is the word "lie?"

When less are born, less will die... Varzan

War is the first casualty of Truth.

Invisible College Press
www.invispress.com
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2577464
United States
01/08/2013 10:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
I believe this too, that some of the articles were in fact posted before the event and they are now pouring out a bunch of them to discredit the whole idea.

The fact that Deseree took down her page so quickly and MSNBC also, was convincing to me that they didn't want people to know about this.

The cache date on the Newtown Bee article is 12/13 as well and we know that many of the FB pages requesting funds were up well before 12/14.

I also agree that it is very difficult to search online now, information is definitely being controlled. We should be able to find a lot of past articles about Sandy Hook school, Newtown, etc. There's nothing.
The Free Galatian

User ID: 31541650
United States
01/08/2013 11:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
I think there is much more to Sandy Hook than meets the eye, but I am having a hard time believing that all of these 'Sandy Hook' elements coming to light now (United Way, Vimeo, etc) having the wrong dates on them is actually 'valid'.

Someone is having fun at our expense.

Try it for yourself...

Go to Google
Type in 'Sandy Hook Tragedy'
Click Search
When the list comes back , at the top of the page just under the logo/search bar, choose Search Tools
Click the triangle next to 'Any Duration' and scroll down to choose 'Custom Range'
When the box pops up, use the << Next to January 2013 to scroll backwards in time. Pick any day you like.... Heck, pick January 1st, 2012!
Choose this date for both the From & To dates of your search.
Click Go.

Behold -- Sandy Hook Tragedy has results even for January 2012.

I don't buy it. Someone jacked with the search in Google -- or else, their search NEVER worked the way we 'thought' it did.

Just ANOTHER way for them to manipulate us. To get us to think that we can *trust* whatever Google gives us -- when in reality the results are staged just like everything else.

Computer Code does exactly what you tell it to do. Someone told Google's Search algorithm to report results that don't make sense.
 Quoting: tandym


Take a look at the background of that prayer. The blue curtain, with the black preacher giving a prayer for Sandy Hook victims.

!!!!!! THAT IS NOT THE US SENATE !!!!!!!

That is some movie studio somewhere!!
"The Truth Shall Set You Free."
SevenThunders

User ID: 15851599
United States
01/08/2013 11:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Please really is this so hard to understand?

From one article I have this quote:

"For student-run coin drives, please submit all donations by February 14, 2012.

The Newtown community has requested only monetary donations at this time. For service or product donation inquiries, please contact newtownboe@gmail.com. To contact Sandy Hook PTA, please email sandyhook@ctpta.org."


Guess what happened? The article put 2012 instead of 2013 for the donation deadline. It's a typo. If an older date appears anywhere in the article it could show up in your dated searches. Mystery solved.
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 11:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
damned
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3041808
United States
01/08/2013 11:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Dutchsinse new video... 'Sandy Hook Twitter from November'.

[link to www.youtube.com]


bump
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 11:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Dutchsinse new video... 'Sandy Hook Twitter from November'.

[link to www.youtube.com]


bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3041808


looks like he removed his vid?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3041808
United States
01/08/2013 11:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Wow. Check out Idahopickers new video-

[link to www.youtube.com]





siren2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3041808
United States
01/08/2013 11:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Dutchsinse new video... 'Sandy Hook Twitter from November'.

[link to www.youtube.com]


bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3041808


looks like he removed his vid?
 Quoting: tandym


It says removed, but hen I clicked on the video, there was a short commentary between Idaho and Dutch.

Click on Idahos vid!

hiding
tandym (OP)

User ID: 28804628
United States
01/08/2013 11:44 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Wow. Check out Idahopickers new video-

[link to www.youtube.com]





siren2
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3041808


says it doesn't exist. What happened? What was it about?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3041808
United States
01/08/2013 11:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Wow. Check out Idahopickers new video-

[link to www.youtube.com]





siren2
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3041808


says it doesn't exist. What happened? What was it about?
 Quoting: tandym



[link to www.youtube.com]



try this
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15676325
United States
01/08/2013 11:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SANDY HOOK -- Something is wrong with those web stats / dates -- We're all being Had.
Yeah -- but this can be manipulated from within the blog software -- its *easy* to do.

So at this point I am thinking that there is a group of hackers out there (that work for the darkside) that are DELIBERATELY falsifying dates on purpose... to OBFUSCATE so that those original *weird* items, that came to light within the first few days of the tragedy, get buried in the nonsense & noise. So that we conspiracy theorists will once again be ignored & laughed off ... its not hard at all to fool the pre-programmed people.
 Quoting: tandym


Exactly this! It is the only way to discredit ALL of the stuff that was found before 12/14/2012. Brilliant! We are SO screwed!!!!

News