All they need to do now is have talking heads on CNN announce that there is a glitch in Google's search engine that is causing a kerfluffle on the interwebs -- and that people are saying the Sandy Hook entries are from prior to the event -- and voila -- everyone, and I mean *everyone* but us, will immediately buy it and go back to sleep.
And that one small mention on CNN will be powerful enough to get the people to ignore the REST of the mounting body of evidence as more of the same jibber jabber -- 'google glitch' etc.
Quoting: tandym I think it's a deliberate disinfo tactic to derail Sandy Hook skepticism.
But there are so many things beyond internet time stamps that don't add up.
Among the many things about Sandy Hook and Adam Lanza that don't make sense to me is the actual shooting part of it.
Certain witnesses reported hearing "hundreds of rounds" fired. Authorities said he had hundreds of rounds on him.
The coroner said each victim had at least three shots each. He further stated that the victims were shot w/ the "long gun," presumably the Bushmaster 223 SEMI-automatic, which means he would have had to pull the trigger for each shot fired.
So the "rail-thin", autistic kid, armed w/ two pistols, a rifle, magazines w/ hundreds of rounds, vest, mask(?), shot through the window to get in, climbed in, killed people in the hallway, killed all but one child in Rousseau's room, went to Soto's room, killed two teachers and six kids.
26 victims x at least three shots each =78 shots that HIT, not counting however many misses. 78+ pulls of the trigger
