Sandy Hook Twitter From November!! video from livestreamDutchsince minutes ago! BREAKING! | |
katballoo User ID: 31832670 Canada 01/09/2013 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23044929 Do you not understand that the first tweet is specifically about a video named "My Movie" not about the sand hook tribute. And as for the second screen shot it's not credible unless you have a direct link. Anyone can manipulate text on webpages using something as simple as firebug and taking a screenshot. Go ahead label me as a shill. Will be laughing my ass off when you tards find out that you're all being trolled lol Nobody knows if it is shill or no shill so they just call us all shills that has any type of disagreement. nobody will understand it unless it happens to them. If they are shills...they have managed to do what they were meant to do...and that is get you off the subject at hand. Come on guys...you have to be smarter then that...ignore them. |
Roniii User ID: 31438634 United States 01/09/2013 09:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1063875 United States 01/09/2013 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28593910 United States 01/09/2013 09:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Roniii User ID: 31438634 United States 01/09/2013 09:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29946842 Canada 01/09/2013 09:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29946842 Canada 01/09/2013 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28593910 United States 01/09/2013 09:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28593910 United States 01/09/2013 09:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
katballoo User ID: 31832670 Canada 01/09/2013 09:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wow. You dont care that we have had the wool pulled over ours eyes once again. WAKE UP SHEEP. Just wondering...what is anybody going to do with this evidence? Are they going to be able to reach anyone that is going to risk putting it out there in the mainstream? All this talk on here, and other sites isn't going to get this out there. Who is going to sacrifice themselves to do this? Anyone? I'm doing what I can locally. The media is censoring any kind of skepticsm. I am in CT. I know...that is the problem. The mainstream media is controlled by Big Pharma/Government. Judges are told what to do. How can any of this have a positive ending? It is scary to think about, but America is already controlled, and it seems that it is only going to get worse. Good luck to you...be safe. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31027986 United States 01/09/2013 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28593910 United States 01/09/2013 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29946842 Canada 01/09/2013 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28593910 United States 01/09/2013 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1379977 United States 01/09/2013 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28593910 United States 01/09/2013 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1379977 United States 01/09/2013 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, the video by Dutchsomething was posted last night, and he took it down because he realized it was inaccurate; I think his heart was in the right place though when he originally posted it (imo). I don't think he posted it so that anyone looking into this case would look like a nutcase...otherwise, why wouldn't he have just left it up? Quoting: JustCinnamon It was proved enough to me (someone who's fairly illiterate when it comes to all of that timestamp stuff), that the person who created the SH Memorial video did so after the shootings. He just replaced an old video he had with the SH one. That is flat wrong. It was taken off of YouTube by YouTube. Not deleted by him. Censorship. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28593910 United States 01/09/2013 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29946842 Canada 01/09/2013 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, the video by Dutchsomething was posted last night, and he took it down because he realized it was inaccurate; I think his heart was in the right place though when he originally posted it (imo). I don't think he posted it so that anyone looking into this case would look like a nutcase...otherwise, why wouldn't he have just left it up? Quoting: JustCinnamon It was proved enough to me (someone who's fairly illiterate when it comes to all of that timestamp stuff), that the person who created the SH Memorial video did so after the shootings. He just replaced an old video he had with the SH one. That is flat wrong. It was taken off of YouTube by YouTube. Not deleted by him. Censorship. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1048849 United States 01/09/2013 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Go ahead label me as a shill. Will be laughing my ass off when you tards find out that you're all being trolled lol Nobody knows if it is shill or no shill so they just call us all shills that has any type of disagreement. nobody will understand it unless it happens to them. If they are shills...they have managed to do what they were meant to do...and that is get you off the subject at hand. Come on guys...you have to be smarter then that...ignore them. The stupidity in this thread amazes me. Did you not see what the AC posted? The first tweet has clearly nothing to do with Sandy hook an he also clearly states that the second tweet is not credible since you can easily manipulate text on a webpage and he also uploaded an example |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27792917 United States 01/09/2013 10:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My dears, I believe Sandy Hook was a false flag, but unfortunately, this tweet proves nothing... Let me explain why....there is no mention to the words "Sandy Hook" in the tweet from November 10 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13266389 Yeah, it actually says "Sandy Hook Elementary School Tribute, Newtown CT." [link to tatoott1009.com] It also says there were "two retweets" and "one favorite." I don't have Twitter, but maybe this will mean something to someone who does. Man, I hate to sound like a shill (because I also believe it was a false flag), but you are getting it wrong. What you're seeing in this picture: [link to tatoott1009.files.wordpress.com] is not what you think you're seeing... The actual text of the tweet ends in the number "3" That's what was posted on November 10, 2012. The title of the video at that time was "My Movie". The reason why you see the video with the name "Sandy Hook" bellow the tweet, is because Twitter embbeds videos from Vimeo bellow any tweet that has a link to a video hosted on Vimeo. Since you accessed his Twitter page only now, in January, Twitter embbeded the CURRENT VERSION OF THE VIDEO, at the time when you accessed Twitter. The text "Sandy Hook Elementary Tribute" does not comes from the database of Twitter, but from the database of Vimeo, and is the title of the video as of the date when you are seeing it. Again, I'm not a shill, and I believe Sandy Hook was a false flag. But unfortunately, so far we have no undeniable proof this guy had previous knowledge of the shooting.... |
s.j User ID: 31750779 United States 01/09/2013 10:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31829571 United States 01/09/2013 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My dears, I believe Sandy Hook was a false flag, but unfortunately, this tweet proves nothing... Let me explain why....there is no mention to the words "Sandy Hook" in the tweet from November 10 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13266389 Yeah, it actually says "Sandy Hook Elementary School Tribute, Newtown CT." [link to tatoott1009.com] It also says there were "two retweets" and "one favorite." I don't have Twitter, but maybe this will mean something to someone who does. Man, I hate to sound like a shill (because I also believe it was a false flag), but you are getting it wrong. What you're seeing in this picture: [link to tatoott1009.files.wordpress.com] is not what you think you're seeing... The actual text of the tweet ends in the number "3" That's what was posted on November 10, 2012. The title of the video at that time was "My Movie". The reason why you see the video with the name "Sandy Hook" bellow the tweet, is because Twitter embbeds videos from Vimeo bellow any tweet that has a link to a video hosted on Vimeo. Since you accessed his Twitter page only now, in January, Twitter embbeded the CURRENT VERSION OF THE VIDEO, at the time when you accessed Twitter. The text "Sandy Hook Elementary Tribute" does not comes from the database of Twitter, but from the database of Vimeo, and is the title of the video as of the date when you are seeing it. Again, I'm not a shill, and I believe Sandy Hook was a false flag. But unfortunately, so far we have no undeniable proof this guy had previous knowledge of the shooting.... Except for Dutch`s test, it did not do that. There is the screenshot of the embedded tweet saying "Test Upload" with the video in question embedded saying "Test Upload2". Yes yes I saw the date manipulation... Now I understand nothing about social media but it would seem to me if we could somehow track those 2 initial retweets, if they are dated prior to 12/14 and say anything about Sandy Hook, then we might have something. Is this possible given the fact his twitter account has been taken down? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31829571 United States 01/09/2013 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31819563 Yeah, it actually says "Sandy Hook Elementary School Tribute, Newtown CT." [link to tatoott1009.com] It also says there were "two retweets" and "one favorite." I don't have Twitter, but maybe this will mean something to someone who does. Man, I hate to sound like a shill (because I also believe it was a false flag), but you are getting it wrong. What you're seeing in this picture: [link to tatoott1009.files.wordpress.com] is not what you think you're seeing... The actual text of the tweet ends in the number "3" That's what was posted on November 10, 2012. The title of the video at that time was "My Movie". The reason why you see the video with the name "Sandy Hook" bellow the tweet, is because Twitter embbeds videos from Vimeo bellow any tweet that has a link to a video hosted on Vimeo. Since you accessed his Twitter page only now, in January, Twitter embbeded the CURRENT VERSION OF THE VIDEO, at the time when you accessed Twitter. The text "Sandy Hook Elementary Tribute" does not comes from the database of Twitter, but from the database of Vimeo, and is the title of the video as of the date when you are seeing it. Again, I'm not a shill, and I believe Sandy Hook was a false flag. But unfortunately, so far we have no undeniable proof this guy had previous knowledge of the shooting.... Except for Dutch`s test, it did not do that. There is the screenshot of the embedded tweet saying "Test Upload" with the video in question embedded saying "Test Upload2". Yes yes I saw the date manipulation... Now I understand nothing about social media but it would seem to me if we could somehow track those 2 initial retweets, if they are dated prior to 12/14 and say anything about Sandy Hook, then we might have something. Is this possible given the fact his twitter account has been taken down? Would the twitter update automatically update the retweets as well? If so it would be a dead end and lead us back to why Dutch`s test came back different then the original tweet of "My Movie". Perhaps Dutch did not do it right? Perhaps a few more inedependent tests are called for, see if we can reproduce the "My Movie" - "Sandy Hook..." tweet. If we can reproduce it, how is it done? If we cant, does it back up Dutch? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30927848 United States 01/09/2013 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30680703 United States 01/09/2013 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My dears, I believe Sandy Hook was a false flag, but unfortunately, this tweet proves nothing... Let me explain why....there is no mention to the words "Sandy Hook" in the tweet from November 10 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13266389 Yeah, it actually says "Sandy Hook Elementary School Tribute, Newtown CT." [link to tatoott1009.com] It also says there were "two retweets" and "one favorite." I don't have Twitter, but maybe this will mean something to someone who does. Man, I hate to sound like a shill (because I also believe it was a false flag), but you are getting it wrong. What you're seeing in this picture: [link to tatoott1009.files.wordpress.com] is not what you think you're seeing... The actual text of the tweet ends in the number "3" That's what was posted on November 10, 2012. The title of the video at that time was "My Movie". The reason why you see the video with the name "Sandy Hook" bellow the tweet, is because Twitter embbeds videos from Vimeo bellow any tweet that has a link to a video hosted on Vimeo. Since you accessed his Twitter page only now, in January, Twitter embbeded the CURRENT VERSION OF THE VIDEO, at the time when you accessed Twitter. The text "Sandy Hook Elementary Tribute" does not comes from the database of Twitter, but from the database of Vimeo, and is the title of the video as of the date when you are seeing it. Again, I'm not a shill, and I believe Sandy Hook was a false flag. But unfortunately, so far we have no undeniable proof this guy had previous knowledge of the shooting.... No, this is actually wrong. If you tweet a link to a vimeo video or "share" a vimeo video as a tweet through the vimeo website than twitter embeds the actual video you are sharing the link of, no other video. The timestamp on the tweet is the actual time that tweet was tweeted and it has nothing to do with when the video was uploaded to vimeo. If you would like to see how this works I just recorded a screencast of myself doing it. [link to screencast-o-matic.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23540384 United States 01/09/2013 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This was debunked yesterday so soooo quickly. On Vimeo you can replace the content of a video without changing the upload date and other statistics. You sheep will believe anything, literally anything. Baaaaaa [link to i.imgur.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1227147 United States 01/09/2013 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22588530 United States 01/09/2013 11:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^^^^^THIS goes to show that you can just edit and troll people. You guys are too gullible I tried google to see the twitter page of joseph ametrano, message there: Sorry, that page doesn’t exist! [link to twitter.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30989565 United States 01/09/2013 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This brings me to something that was on facebook a couple of days ago about Micheal Holmes' attorney and the fact that she was a teacher at Sandy Hook. The picture was from a facebook page called what the fuck is this, but guess what now its gone!!! |