|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Wow a paid shill goes public and ADMITTS he was paid to shill on GLP
|
|
Poster Handle
|
The Guy |
|
Post Content
|
...
Impossible, really. If you try to do that, you end up seeing shills under every rock. It really gets on my nerves when people accuse someone of being a shill just because they don't agree with them. Just test what people are saying. If it doesn't mesh with known facts, then they're wrong, whether they're a shill or not.
Quoting: The Guy No, it is easy to tell when someone genuinely wants to debate. Take Chemtrails. Who in their right mind would take the trouble to continuously oppose honest questioning about the unusual observations many have that Chemtrails are not at all consistent with contrails? There is no danger in letting that discussion take place. Some purport to want to "protect" others, but come on there are shills who have been on the Chemtrail topic FOR YEARS. Any unpaid person would eventually drift away and let the topic go on. Only a paid shill would time and time again come back to attempt to redirect the discussion. It is also apparent because there are different predictable approaches used by shills. They try to create realistic online personas but fail miserably. Do you believe shills exist? Oh, you're referring to me. I'm honored. I argue against chemtrails because the prime tenant of the belief is that contrails can't and don't remain visible and/or form clouds. It bugs me that people keep saying that when 30 seconds of research proves that it simply isn't true. If that doesn't make sense to you, sorry, I'm weird. You claiming that people must be paid to argue against something they disagree with just shows that you lack empathy and understanding that everybody isn't exactly like you. As for the existence of shills, I think they are around. If we could find out what they're paid to mislead us from, we could learn a lot about what are actual conspiracies and what are bullshit. What brought you to this thread? What is your position on the tell-all article linked? Do you dispute that it reflects the reality of paid shills? Um, read what I said above. I'm pretty sure shills exist, and I'd like to know what topics they're paid to distract from.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
