Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,413 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,381,397
Pageviews Today: 3,237,814Threads Today: 782Posts Today: 14,670
10:38 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH

 
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 03:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
Isn't this rehashing one post from 2007-8?
I feel like I remember this OP from back then.

Anyway, give me a timeline spanning 50 years and I'll tell you that the chances of something meaningful happening on may 15th are very high.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31835807


He's gotta timeline of about 10-15 years I think, and really refers to only the last 6-8 even possibly with most of his predictions because only just recently is bush sr sick, thatchers stroke, mandelas hospitilization, obama accident before obamas time
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
01/10/2013 03:44 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
...


headbash
Wow, way to miss the point. No, that is not "prophecy confirmed" that's "prophecy is a giant fucking fail despite it being a routine occurance!" SUPERNOVAE ARE DISCOVERED ALL THE TIME, DAY IN, DAY OUT! If anything it'd be slightly more unsual for there NOT to be at least one supernova discovered on any given day. In 2011 for example there were 888 supernovae discovered. That's what, slightly more than 2 per day on average? So he "predicted" an average day and thus far it's still a fucking fail.
[link to www.rochesterastronomy.org]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Who's to say he meant supernova? Maybe he literally meant we would witness them explode? Black & white and way too serious for a phrophecy thread bro.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Holy shit, do you even know what the word supernova means?! THAT'S WHAT A SUPERNOVA IS! YOU YOURSELF TRIED TO USE OLD SUPERNOVAE AS CONFIRMATION!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Explode in real time astro not view the remnants of something that happened lightyears away. jesus christ go to the store and buy a box of crayolas and color in your black and white world.
 Quoting: aliensbro


"on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode"
What part of that do you not understand? There are no reports of any astronomers seeing "2 stars xplode" yesterday (despite 2 per day being about the average), that is what a supernova IS! Are you really this dense? The new supernova discoveries I listed are not fucking remnants, it's the discovery and sight of the explosion itself! For pete's sake, do some research before you dismiss what it is I'm telling you!

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 01/10/2013 03:44 PM
astrobanner2
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 03:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
me tel u glp very gulible
fal for roleplay evryday
fal for conspiritainment evryday
me cee no hope for human if glp represent "awakened" human
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12195955


GLP and sites alike are the place you derived your information of the existence OF awakened humans FROM, what are you saying?
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 03:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
...


Who's to say he meant supernova? Maybe he literally meant we would witness them explode? Black & white and way too serious for a phrophecy thread bro.
 Quoting: aliensbro


Holy shit, do you even know what the word supernova means?! THAT'S WHAT A SUPERNOVA IS! YOU YOURSELF TRIED TO USE OLD SUPERNOVAE AS CONFIRMATION!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Explode in real time astro not view the remnants of something that happened lightyears away. jesus christ go to the store and buy a box of crayolas and color in your black and white world.
 Quoting: aliensbro


"on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode"
What part of that do you not understand? There are no reports of any astronomers seeing "2 stars xplode" yesterday (despite 2 per day being about the average), that is what a supernova IS! Are you really this dense? The new supernova discoveries I listed are not fucking remnants, it's the discovery and sight of the explosion itself! For pete's sake, do some research before you dismiss what it is I'm telling you!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Dude your really just misunderstanding what I'm trying to say. PICTURE THERE WERE 2 STARS 1 AU FROM EARTH AND THEY EXPLODED, WOULD THIS APPEAR THE SAME AS VIEWING A SUPERNOVA A THOUSAND LIGHTYEARS AWAY? We're arguing symantics and it's quite a stupid argument. Your telling me from the point an object explodes it maintains the same visual structure from start to finish? Black and white.

Last Edited by aliensbro on 01/10/2013 03:47 PM
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
01/10/2013 03:46 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
...


Setting aside the fact that no new supernovas have yet been reported for Jan. 9th, do you have any idea how common it is? They're CONSTANTLY finding new ones, often multiple per day! It's not unusual at all, it's a bullshit "prediction" of the normal state of things and even then it hasn't even come true yet!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

I can accept that. But normally new found supernovae aren't reported in the news, unless they're special. Both seem to be.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426


Neither of the ones mentioned were discovered in 2013, let alone on January 9th.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

But only now the press reports it.
Also, technically astroonomers are seeing the stars explode. Seein doesn't equal discovering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426

They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time!

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 01/10/2013 03:46 PM
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
01/10/2013 03:48 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
...


Holy shit, do you even know what the word supernova means?! THAT'S WHAT A SUPERNOVA IS! YOU YOURSELF TRIED TO USE OLD SUPERNOVAE AS CONFIRMATION!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Explode in real time astro not view the remnants of something that happened lightyears away. jesus christ go to the store and buy a box of crayolas and color in your black and white world.
 Quoting: aliensbro


"on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode"
What part of that do you not understand? There are no reports of any astronomers seeing "2 stars xplode" yesterday (despite 2 per day being about the average), that is what a supernova IS! Are you really this dense? The new supernova discoveries I listed are not fucking remnants, it's the discovery and sight of the explosion itself! For pete's sake, do some research before you dismiss what it is I'm telling you!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Dude your really just misunderstanding what I'm trying to say. PICTURE THERE WERE 2 STARS 1 AU FROM EARTH AND THEY EXPLODED, WOULD THIS APPEAR THE SAME AS VIEWING A SUPERNOVA A THOUSAND LIGHTYEARS AWAY?
 Quoting: aliensbro


Whether the light reaches you 8 minutes or 8 million years after the explosion happened is irrelevant to the fact that it's when the light actually arrives that you see it. The claim was that "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Does it say "on 9 january 2 star xplode?" Nope. It's more specific. It says "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode."
astrobanner2
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 03:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
...

I can accept that. But normally new found supernovae aren't reported in the news, unless they're special. Both seem to be.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426


Neither of the ones mentioned were discovered in 2013, let alone on January 9th.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

But only now the press reports it.
Also, technically astroonomers are seeing the stars explode. Seein doesn't equal discovering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426

They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


THEY ARE SEEING STARS THAT HAVE EXPLODED THEY ARE NOT SEEING A STAR EXPLODE. JESUS.
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
01/10/2013 03:50 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
...


Neither of the ones mentioned were discovered in 2013, let alone on January 9th.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

But only now the press reports it.
Also, technically astroonomers are seeing the stars explode. Seein doesn't equal discovering.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426

They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


THEY ARE SEEING STARS THAT HAVE EXPLODED THEY ARE NOT SEEING A STAR EXPLODE. JESUS.
 Quoting: aliensbro


YES THEY ARE SEEING A STAR EXPLODE! I DON'T FUCKING CARE IF IT'S ONE GODDAMN AU AWAY, EVEN IN THAT CASE IT "EXPLODED" 8 MINUTES BEFORE YOU SAW IT, BUT YOU STILL SAW IT FUCKING EXPLODE!
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12195955
United States
01/10/2013 03:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
me tel u glp very gulible
fal for roleplay evryday
fal for conspiritainment evryday
me cee no hope for human if glp represent "awakened" human
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12195955


GLP and sites alike are the place you derived your information of the existence OF awakened humans FROM, what are you saying?
 Quoting: aliensbro


me tel u hav bad reading comprehension
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 03:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
...


Explode in real time astro not view the remnants of something that happened lightyears away. jesus christ go to the store and buy a box of crayolas and color in your black and white world.
 Quoting: aliensbro


"on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode"
What part of that do you not understand? There are no reports of any astronomers seeing "2 stars xplode" yesterday (despite 2 per day being about the average), that is what a supernova IS! Are you really this dense? The new supernova discoveries I listed are not fucking remnants, it's the discovery and sight of the explosion itself! For pete's sake, do some research before you dismiss what it is I'm telling you!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Dude your really just misunderstanding what I'm trying to say. PICTURE THERE WERE 2 STARS 1 AU FROM EARTH AND THEY EXPLODED, WOULD THIS APPEAR THE SAME AS VIEWING A SUPERNOVA A THOUSAND LIGHTYEARS AWAY?
 Quoting: aliensbro


Whether the light reaches you 8 minutes or 8 million years after the explosion happened is irrelevant to the fact that it's when the light actually arrives that you see it. The claim was that "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Does it say "on 9 january 2 star xplode?" Nope. It's more specific. It says "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode."
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Going off of this he could mean anything by that. From witnessing the explosion of a star right next to you, to a supernova lightyears away. Who knows dude its all speculation. Fuck I could go get an astronomer and show him the pictures we posted earlier of the supernova, and technically that would make the phrophecy come true, thats not the point though is it
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 03:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
me tel u glp very gulible
fal for roleplay evryday
fal for conspiritainment evryday
me cee no hope for human if glp represent "awakened" human
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12195955


GLP and sites alike are the place you derived your information of the existence OF awakened humans FROM, what are you saying?
 Quoting: aliensbro


me tel u hav bad reading comprehension
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12195955


I comprehended each sentence. Your going to call us gullible, while citing the representation of awakened humans. Right.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31686426
Germany
01/10/2013 03:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
Do you know how many new supernovas are seen and discovered on an average day? SN 2009ip isn't new either.
[link to www.rochesterastronomy.org]
Image Credit Date Mag Filter Comments
CHASE 2009/08/26.11 17.9 C Discovery
Nor is SN SCP-0401
[link to www.eurekalert.org]
"Supernova SCP-0401, nicknamed “Mingus,” was collected by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2004"

No supernovas have been reported for January 9th yet, but they probably will be considering that's usually one found nearly every day and often multiple per day.
[link to www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu]
It takes a few days for each discovery to be verified. As of yet though there are no reports of supernovae discovered on January 9th awaiting confirmation.
[link to www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu]
Latest potential discovery was on January 8th.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Yay my favorite debunker is here. hf

Few things to note:
SN 2009ip was only known as a Supernova imposter until very recently.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426

You know what 2009 means? It was found in 2009. Not January 9th, 2013.
Also you should have pasted the full quote about SN SCP-0401:
Supernova SCP-0401, nicknamed “Mingus,” was collected by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2004 but could not be positively identified until after the installation of a new camera that serendipitously acquired more data.
 Quoting: AC

You're reaching, really really reaching. Worse, it wasn't seen on January 9th:
[link to www.stsci.edu]
It was seen prior to that and the story is just now being published.
So basically, both supernovae are new, as in not verified as supernova before.
 Quoting: AC

They're not new, both were suspected discoveries and were seen long before now, the claim was that they would be seen specifically on January 9th.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

Who says no one is looking at them right now. Also, lots of astronomers are seeing them in newspapers/TV/internet. tounge

I know what you mean. But consider this: This (supposed) entity obviously is not an astronomer, doesn't even speak proper english. I think errors in translation are very likely.

Two different supernovae in MSM are odd.

And don't belittle us please, ofcourse i read that SN2009ip was discovered in '09. Also found this link on your link about the SN:
[link to arxiv.org]
Not sure about the duration of such an event, guess it takes several months/up to years?

Concluding words: Think out of the box and don't put every word on the gold scale. cool2
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
01/10/2013 03:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
Going off of this he could mean anything by that. From witnessing the explosion of a star right next to you, to a supernova lightyears away.
 Quoting: aliensbro

It's straightforward, "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Nowhere in there does it say when the star physically exploded, it's about when you see it. It's self-explanatory and you still don't even understand the conditions of the claim. It doesn't matter if it's right next to you or a million light years away or more. You're desperately trying to re-define the plain simple meaning of the claim because it's a miserable failure. Even an idiot could figure out that it simply means actually seeing a star explode, which is exactly what happens when a new supernova is found.
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
01/10/2013 03:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
Do you know how many new supernovas are seen and discovered on an average day? SN 2009ip isn't new either.
[link to www.rochesterastronomy.org]
Image Credit Date Mag Filter Comments
CHASE 2009/08/26.11 17.9 C Discovery
Nor is SN SCP-0401
[link to www.eurekalert.org]
"Supernova SCP-0401, nicknamed “Mingus,” was collected by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2004"

No supernovas have been reported for January 9th yet, but they probably will be considering that's usually one found nearly every day and often multiple per day.
[link to www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu]
It takes a few days for each discovery to be verified. As of yet though there are no reports of supernovae discovered on January 9th awaiting confirmation.
[link to www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu]
Latest potential discovery was on January 8th.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Yay my favorite debunker is here. hf

Few things to note:
SN 2009ip was only known as a Supernova imposter until very recently.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426

You know what 2009 means? It was found in 2009. Not January 9th, 2013.
Also you should have pasted the full quote about SN SCP-0401:
Supernova SCP-0401, nicknamed “Mingus,” was collected by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2004 but could not be positively identified until after the installation of a new camera that serendipitously acquired more data.
 Quoting: AC

You're reaching, really really reaching. Worse, it wasn't seen on January 9th:
[link to www.stsci.edu]
It was seen prior to that and the story is just now being published.
So basically, both supernovae are new, as in not verified as supernova before.
 Quoting: AC

They're not new, both were suspected discoveries and were seen long before now, the claim was that they would be seen specifically on January 9th.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

Who says no one is looking at them right now.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426

They exploded years ago, they're not still exploding. If you looked at them now all you'd see, at best, is a remnant. Dozens of such remnants are seen by astronomers every night, at least. Can't have it both ways.
Also, lots of astronomers are seeing them in newspapers/TV/internet. tounge
 Quoting: AC

Again, severe confirmation bias trying to change the plain simple meaning of the claim post-facto. And in that case, hundreds were seen in various images online by astronomers yesterday, not 2.
Concluding words: Think out of the box and don't put every word on the gold scale. cool2
 Quoting: AC

Incredible claims require incredible proof. This claim was very specific and straightforward, stop trying to twist it because it's stupid.
astrobanner2
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 03:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
Going off of this he could mean anything by that. From witnessing the explosion of a star right next to you, to a supernova lightyears away.
 Quoting: aliensbro

It's straightforward, "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Nowhere in there does it say when the star physically exploded, it's about when you see it. It's self-explanatory and you still don't even understand the conditions of the claim. It doesn't matter if it's right next to you or a million light years away or more. You're desperately trying to re-define the plain simple meaning of the claim because it's a miserable failure. Even an idiot could figure out that it simply means actually seeing a star explode, which is exactly what happens when a new supernova is found.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


No your reaching for things that aren't said in the phrophecy. It literally says they cee 2 star xplode, and nothing more. And I guarantee atleast 2 astronomers saw 2 stars explode today
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31686426
Germany
01/10/2013 03:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

Ha alright, answered my question about the duration of such an event there.
I'd have never thought that stars explode so frequently. tounge
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31686426
Germany
01/10/2013 03:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
So doom off? cry
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 04:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
Astro didn't you say there WAS a potential discovery on the 8th?
Defj@m

User ID: 7806954
United Kingdom
01/10/2013 04:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
helo
me tel u day be4 me have important thing 2 tel u
elders finish calculate they say ok me can tel u this important thing now
so me tel u know in best wordings me have lernt
on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode yor line time
this 2 star xplode is part of yor 2nd witnesing prophesy
now u must lisen me very good and lisen warning ok make yorself ready
u know lite travel faster than sound ok yes
on 9 january yor nasas cee lite of 2 star xplode ok yes
elders calculate that from now it is time for sound wave of 2 star xploding
come hit earth anyday soon now
window open from today til end july yor line time for when wave hits
why nasas wait so long 2 tel u on 14 may only about this me not know their reason 4 delay
me lern wording sonicboom
me tel u know what is coming yor way wil be a cosmosonicboom
this sound wave wil change many things and cause big disasters and many sufferings
this sound wavings make comets ignite ok
this sound wavings make moons forget placing ok
this sound wavings make planets lose or change orbit ok
there is no more forgivnes earth this thing is coming
yor leaders get desperat want escape try use cern but make things worsening
but not sure yor leaders try haarp only make earth angry
me sory 4 have to tel u this bad news ok sory
but elders give some beter news also
elders have problem calculate where yor sun wil be position when wave hits
if earth is behind sun when wave hit earth sufering wil be much les ok
sun wil absorb much damage
but then sun damge wil have efect tranfer on earth also but not as big if not behind sun
elders not al agree but many say earth wil be behind sun so this some good news ok
u just be ready in mind spirit and yor body ok
please tel every1 everywhere be ready with body and spirit from today
can 1 u please post this front screen to warn
me also need leve yor line time soon ok
me witnesing completed soon


And could be coincidence but Jan 9th.. #1 [link to www.bbc.co.uk]

#2 [link to zeenews.india.com]

Two supernova explosions first seen and photographed today, jan 9th.
 Quoting: aliensbro


So, sound travels in the vacuum of space now? Do you know what a sound wave is?

Last Edited by Defj@m on 01/10/2013 04:01 PM
When you do things right people won't be sure you've done anything at all
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 04:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
your potus is a non citizen
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31890567


Touché

OP Piers is a dick but don't send him back to us, use him for target practice or something.
 Quoting: Wispa


lol

let him stay I dont care anymore...

but for fucks sake make the fucker obtain citizenship!!

If you are gonna run your mouth about my countries rights... at least be a citizen!

lol

either that or deport him to the moon.
 Quoting: Dr. Acula


helo
me tel u day be4 me have important thing 2 tel u
elders finish calculate they say ok me can tel u this important thing now
so me tel u know in best wordings me have lernt
on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode yor line time
this 2 star xplode is part of yor 2nd witnesing prophesy
now u must lisen me very good and lisen warning ok make yorself ready
u know lite travel faster than sound ok yes
on 9 january yor nasas cee lite of 2 star xplode ok yes
elders calculate that from now it is time for sound wave of 2 star xploding
come hit earth anyday soon now
window open from today til end july yor line time for when wave hits
why nasas wait so long 2 tel u on 14 may only about this me not know their reason 4 delay
me lern wording sonicboom
me tel u know what is coming yor way wil be a cosmosonicboom
this sound wave wil change many things and cause big disasters and many sufferings
this sound wavings make comets ignite ok
this sound wavings make moons forget placing ok
this sound wavings make planets lose or change orbit ok
there is no more forgivnes earth this thing is coming
yor leaders get desperat want escape try use cern but make things worsening
but not sure yor leaders try haarp only make earth angry
me sory 4 have to tel u this bad news ok sory
but elders give some beter news also
elders have problem calculate where yor sun wil be position when wave hits
if earth is behind sun when wave hit earth sufering wil be much les ok
sun wil absorb much damage
but then sun damge wil have efect tranfer on earth also but not as big if not behind sun
elders not al agree but many say earth wil be behind sun so this some good news ok
u just be ready in mind spirit and yor body ok
please tel every1 everywhere be ready with body and spirit from today
can 1 u please post this front screen to warn
me also need leve yor line time soon ok
me witnesing completed soon


And could be coincidence but Jan 9th.. #1 [link to www.bbc.co.uk]

#2 [link to zeenews.india.com]

Two supernova explosions first seen and photographed today, jan 9th.
 Quoting: aliensbro


So, sound travels in the vacuum of space now? Do you know what a sound wave is?
 Quoting: Defj@m


Think shockwave instead of sonicboom. Sound the trumpets.
tandym

User ID: 1667343
United States
01/10/2013 04:06 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
ok now that is ....well, i dunno what. But I'm going to go back and read it all again. Scary.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19188476


Whoa.
 Quoting: Starlighttraveller


damned
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 04:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
It's not just your normal GLP prophecy.
Reddwolf

User ID: 24577177
United States
01/10/2013 04:08 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
It's not just your normal GLP prophecy.
 Quoting: aliensbro


bump
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
01/10/2013 04:08 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

Ha alright, answered my question about the duration of such an event there.
I'd have never thought that stars explode so frequently. tounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426


They do. All the time. The universe is very big. Duration depends on the supernova type. Type II are the classical kind where the star actually explodes and forms either a neutron star/pular/or black hole. The explosion itself takes just seconds, but the light from it can take days to diminish (the rate depends on sub-type as well). The other common type, Ia, are due to accretion on a white dwarf and are also very fast events and have even sharper peak luminosities.
astrobanner2
aliensbro (OP)

User ID: 31172160
United States
01/10/2013 04:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

Ha alright, answered my question about the duration of such an event there.
I'd have never thought that stars explode so frequently. tounge
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426


They do. All the time. The universe is very big. Duration depends on the supernova type. Type II are the classical kind where the star actually explodes and forms either a neutron star/pular/or black hole. The explosion itself takes just seconds, but the light from it can take days to diminish (the rate depends on sub-type as well). The other common type, Ia, are due to accretion on a white dwarf and are also very fast events and have even sharper peak luminosities.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Was there a discovery on the 8th?
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
01/10/2013 04:10 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
Astro didn't you say there WAS a potential discovery on the 8th?
 Quoting: aliensbro


Yes, so what? The claim was that there would be 2 on the 9th, which would be an average day, but even that is a fail. That should tell you that it's complete bullshit, but for some reason you still don't get it.
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
01/10/2013 04:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
Going off of this he could mean anything by that. From witnessing the explosion of a star right next to you, to a supernova lightyears away.
 Quoting: aliensbro

It's straightforward, "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Nowhere in there does it say when the star physically exploded, it's about when you see it. It's self-explanatory and you still don't even understand the conditions of the claim. It doesn't matter if it's right next to you or a million light years away or more. You're desperately trying to re-define the plain simple meaning of the claim because it's a miserable failure. Even an idiot could figure out that it simply means actually seeing a star explode, which is exactly what happens when a new supernova is found.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


No your reaching for things that aren't said in the phrophecy. It literally says they cee 2 star xplode, and nothing more. And I guarantee atleast 2 astronomers saw 2 stars explode today
 Quoting: aliensbro


Nope, you don't get to have it both ways. Either it literally means seeing 2 stars explode for real, which would mean 2 new supernovae discoveries which would not be unusual at all, or it means seeing pictures of 2 supernovae, in which case it's wrong AND meaningless since hundreds are seen by astronomers every single fucking day, not "2."
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31807577
United States
01/10/2013 04:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
Good catch.
tandym

User ID: 1667343
United States
01/10/2013 04:19 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
...


Setting aside the fact that no new supernovas have yet been reported for Jan. 9th, do you have any idea how common it is? They're CONSTANTLY finding new ones, often multiple per day! It's not unusual at all, it's a bullshit "prediction" of the normal state of things and even then it hasn't even come true yet!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

I can accept that. But normally new found supernovae aren't reported in the news, unless they're special. Both seem to be.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426


Neither of the ones mentioned were discovered in 2013, let alone on January 9th.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

But only now the press reports it.
Also, technically astroonomers are seeing the stars explode. Seein doesn't equal discovering.

But yeah, no time to panic yet, unless Mandela or Bush Sr. or Thatcher or someone else mentioned in the original thread dies.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426


Well, they are all pretty old and frail ... so chances are actually not out of the realm of possibility.
tandym

User ID: 1667343
United States
01/10/2013 04:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH
Astro didn't you say there WAS a potential discovery on the 8th?
 Quoting: aliensbro


Yes, so what? The claim was that there would be 2 on the 9th, which would be an average day, but even that is a fail. That should tell you that it's complete bullshit, but for some reason you still don't get it.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


What time zone was the discovery made in? Time Zones muck everything up.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!