ME TEL U NOW PHROPHECY UNCONFIRMED 2 SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS JAN 9TH | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't this rehashing one post from 2007-8? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31835807 I feel like I remember this OP from back then. Anyway, give me a timeline spanning 50 years and I'll tell you that the chances of something meaningful happening on may 15th are very high. He's gotta timeline of about 10-15 years I think, and really refers to only the last 6-8 even possibly with most of his predictions because only just recently is bush sr sick, thatchers stroke, mandelas hospitilization, obama accident before obamas time |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/10/2013 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Wow, way to miss the point. No, that is not "prophecy confirmed" that's "prophecy is a giant fucking fail despite it being a routine occurance!" SUPERNOVAE ARE DISCOVERED ALL THE TIME, DAY IN, DAY OUT! If anything it'd be slightly more unsual for there NOT to be at least one supernova discovered on any given day. In 2011 for example there were 888 supernovae discovered. That's what, slightly more than 2 per day on average? So he "predicted" an average day and thus far it's still a fucking fail. [link to www.rochesterastronomy.org] Who's to say he meant supernova? Maybe he literally meant we would witness them explode? Black & white and way too serious for a phrophecy thread bro. Holy shit, do you even know what the word supernova means?! THAT'S WHAT A SUPERNOVA IS! YOU YOURSELF TRIED TO USE OLD SUPERNOVAE AS CONFIRMATION! Explode in real time astro not view the remnants of something that happened lightyears away. jesus christ go to the store and buy a box of crayolas and color in your black and white world. "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode" What part of that do you not understand? There are no reports of any astronomers seeing "2 stars xplode" yesterday (despite 2 per day being about the average), that is what a supernova IS! Are you really this dense? The new supernova discoveries I listed are not fucking remnants, it's the discovery and sight of the explosion itself! For pete's sake, do some research before you dismiss what it is I'm telling you! Last Edited by Astromut on 01/10/2013 03:44 PM |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | me tel u glp very gulible Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12195955 fal for roleplay evryday fal for conspiritainment evryday me cee no hope for human if glp represent "awakened" human GLP and sites alike are the place you derived your information of the existence OF awakened humans FROM, what are you saying? |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: aliensbro Who's to say he meant supernova? Maybe he literally meant we would witness them explode? Black & white and way too serious for a phrophecy thread bro. Holy shit, do you even know what the word supernova means?! THAT'S WHAT A SUPERNOVA IS! YOU YOURSELF TRIED TO USE OLD SUPERNOVAE AS CONFIRMATION! Explode in real time astro not view the remnants of something that happened lightyears away. jesus christ go to the store and buy a box of crayolas and color in your black and white world. "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode" What part of that do you not understand? There are no reports of any astronomers seeing "2 stars xplode" yesterday (despite 2 per day being about the average), that is what a supernova IS! Are you really this dense? The new supernova discoveries I listed are not fucking remnants, it's the discovery and sight of the explosion itself! For pete's sake, do some research before you dismiss what it is I'm telling you! Dude your really just misunderstanding what I'm trying to say. PICTURE THERE WERE 2 STARS 1 AU FROM EARTH AND THEY EXPLODED, WOULD THIS APPEAR THE SAME AS VIEWING A SUPERNOVA A THOUSAND LIGHTYEARS AWAY? We're arguing symantics and it's quite a stupid argument. Your telling me from the point an object explodes it maintains the same visual structure from start to finish? Black and white. Last Edited by aliensbro on 01/10/2013 03:47 PM |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/10/2013 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Setting aside the fact that no new supernovas have yet been reported for Jan. 9th, do you have any idea how common it is? They're CONSTANTLY finding new ones, often multiple per day! It's not unusual at all, it's a bullshit "prediction" of the normal state of things and even then it hasn't even come true yet! I can accept that. But normally new found supernovae aren't reported in the news, unless they're special. Both seem to be. Neither of the ones mentioned were discovered in 2013, let alone on January 9th. But only now the press reports it. Also, technically astroonomers are seeing the stars explode. Seein doesn't equal discovering. They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time! Last Edited by Astromut on 01/10/2013 03:46 PM |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/10/2013 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Holy shit, do you even know what the word supernova means?! THAT'S WHAT A SUPERNOVA IS! YOU YOURSELF TRIED TO USE OLD SUPERNOVAE AS CONFIRMATION! Explode in real time astro not view the remnants of something that happened lightyears away. jesus christ go to the store and buy a box of crayolas and color in your black and white world. "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode" What part of that do you not understand? There are no reports of any astronomers seeing "2 stars xplode" yesterday (despite 2 per day being about the average), that is what a supernova IS! Are you really this dense? The new supernova discoveries I listed are not fucking remnants, it's the discovery and sight of the explosion itself! For pete's sake, do some research before you dismiss what it is I'm telling you! Dude your really just misunderstanding what I'm trying to say. PICTURE THERE WERE 2 STARS 1 AU FROM EARTH AND THEY EXPLODED, WOULD THIS APPEAR THE SAME AS VIEWING A SUPERNOVA A THOUSAND LIGHTYEARS AWAY? Whether the light reaches you 8 minutes or 8 million years after the explosion happened is irrelevant to the fact that it's when the light actually arrives that you see it. The claim was that "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Does it say "on 9 january 2 star xplode?" Nope. It's more specific. It says "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 03:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31686426 I can accept that. But normally new found supernovae aren't reported in the news, unless they're special. Both seem to be. Neither of the ones mentioned were discovered in 2013, let alone on January 9th. But only now the press reports it. Also, technically astroonomers are seeing the stars explode. Seein doesn't equal discovering. They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time! THEY ARE SEEING STARS THAT HAVE EXPLODED THEY ARE NOT SEEING A STAR EXPLODE. JESUS. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/10/2013 03:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Neither of the ones mentioned were discovered in 2013, let alone on January 9th. But only now the press reports it. Also, technically astroonomers are seeing the stars explode. Seein doesn't equal discovering. They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time! THEY ARE SEEING STARS THAT HAVE EXPLODED THEY ARE NOT SEEING A STAR EXPLODE. JESUS. YES THEY ARE SEEING A STAR EXPLODE! I DON'T FUCKING CARE IF IT'S ONE GODDAMN AU AWAY, EVEN IN THAT CASE IT "EXPLODED" 8 MINUTES BEFORE YOU SAW IT, BUT YOU STILL SAW IT FUCKING EXPLODE! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12195955 United States 01/10/2013 03:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | me tel u glp very gulible Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12195955 fal for roleplay evryday fal for conspiritainment evryday me cee no hope for human if glp represent "awakened" human GLP and sites alike are the place you derived your information of the existence OF awakened humans FROM, what are you saying? me tel u hav bad reading comprehension |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: aliensbro Explode in real time astro not view the remnants of something that happened lightyears away. jesus christ go to the store and buy a box of crayolas and color in your black and white world. "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode" What part of that do you not understand? There are no reports of any astronomers seeing "2 stars xplode" yesterday (despite 2 per day being about the average), that is what a supernova IS! Are you really this dense? The new supernova discoveries I listed are not fucking remnants, it's the discovery and sight of the explosion itself! For pete's sake, do some research before you dismiss what it is I'm telling you! Dude your really just misunderstanding what I'm trying to say. PICTURE THERE WERE 2 STARS 1 AU FROM EARTH AND THEY EXPLODED, WOULD THIS APPEAR THE SAME AS VIEWING A SUPERNOVA A THOUSAND LIGHTYEARS AWAY? Whether the light reaches you 8 minutes or 8 million years after the explosion happened is irrelevant to the fact that it's when the light actually arrives that you see it. The claim was that "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Does it say "on 9 january 2 star xplode?" Nope. It's more specific. It says "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Going off of this he could mean anything by that. From witnessing the explosion of a star right next to you, to a supernova lightyears away. Who knows dude its all speculation. Fuck I could go get an astronomer and show him the pictures we posted earlier of the supernova, and technically that would make the phrophecy come true, thats not the point though is it |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | me tel u glp very gulible Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12195955 fal for roleplay evryday fal for conspiritainment evryday me cee no hope for human if glp represent "awakened" human GLP and sites alike are the place you derived your information of the existence OF awakened humans FROM, what are you saying? me tel u hav bad reading comprehension I comprehended each sentence. Your going to call us gullible, while citing the representation of awakened humans. Right. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31686426 Germany 01/10/2013 03:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Do you know how many new supernovas are seen and discovered on an average day? SN 2009ip isn't new either. Quoting: Dr. Astro [link to www.rochesterastronomy.org] Image Credit Date Mag Filter Comments CHASE 2009/08/26.11 17.9 C Discovery Nor is SN SCP-0401 [link to www.eurekalert.org] "Supernova SCP-0401, nicknamed “Mingus,” was collected by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2004" No supernovas have been reported for January 9th yet, but they probably will be considering that's usually one found nearly every day and often multiple per day. [link to www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu] It takes a few days for each discovery to be verified. As of yet though there are no reports of supernovae discovered on January 9th awaiting confirmation. [link to www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu] Latest potential discovery was on January 8th. Yay my favorite debunker is here. Few things to note: SN 2009ip was only known as a Supernova imposter until very recently. You know what 2009 means? It was found in 2009. Not January 9th, 2013. Also you should have pasted the full quote about SN SCP-0401: Quoting: ACSupernova SCP-0401, nicknamed “Mingus,” was collected by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2004 but could not be positively identified until after the installation of a new camera that serendipitously acquired more data. You're reaching, really really reaching. Worse, it wasn't seen on January 9th: [link to www.stsci.edu] It was seen prior to that and the story is just now being published. So basically, both supernovae are new, as in not verified as supernova before. Quoting: ACThey're not new, both were suspected discoveries and were seen long before now, the claim was that they would be seen specifically on January 9th. Who says no one is looking at them right now. Also, lots of astronomers are seeing them in newspapers/TV/internet. I know what you mean. But consider this: This (supposed) entity obviously is not an astronomer, doesn't even speak proper english. I think errors in translation are very likely. Two different supernovae in MSM are odd. And don't belittle us please, ofcourse i read that SN2009ip was discovered in '09. Also found this link on your link about the SN: [link to arxiv.org] Not sure about the duration of such an event, guess it takes several months/up to years? Concluding words: Think out of the box and don't put every word on the gold scale. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/10/2013 03:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Going off of this he could mean anything by that. From witnessing the explosion of a star right next to you, to a supernova lightyears away. Quoting: aliensbro It's straightforward, "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Nowhere in there does it say when the star physically exploded, it's about when you see it. It's self-explanatory and you still don't even understand the conditions of the claim. It doesn't matter if it's right next to you or a million light years away or more. You're desperately trying to re-define the plain simple meaning of the claim because it's a miserable failure. Even an idiot could figure out that it simply means actually seeing a star explode, which is exactly what happens when a new supernova is found. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/10/2013 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Do you know how many new supernovas are seen and discovered on an average day? SN 2009ip isn't new either. Quoting: Dr. Astro [link to www.rochesterastronomy.org] Image Credit Date Mag Filter Comments CHASE 2009/08/26.11 17.9 C Discovery Nor is SN SCP-0401 [link to www.eurekalert.org] "Supernova SCP-0401, nicknamed “Mingus,” was collected by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2004" No supernovas have been reported for January 9th yet, but they probably will be considering that's usually one found nearly every day and often multiple per day. [link to www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu] It takes a few days for each discovery to be verified. As of yet though there are no reports of supernovae discovered on January 9th awaiting confirmation. [link to www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu] Latest potential discovery was on January 8th. Yay my favorite debunker is here. Few things to note: SN 2009ip was only known as a Supernova imposter until very recently. You know what 2009 means? It was found in 2009. Not January 9th, 2013. Also you should have pasted the full quote about SN SCP-0401: Quoting: ACSupernova SCP-0401, nicknamed “Mingus,” was collected by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2004 but could not be positively identified until after the installation of a new camera that serendipitously acquired more data. You're reaching, really really reaching. Worse, it wasn't seen on January 9th: [link to www.stsci.edu] It was seen prior to that and the story is just now being published. So basically, both supernovae are new, as in not verified as supernova before. Quoting: ACThey're not new, both were suspected discoveries and were seen long before now, the claim was that they would be seen specifically on January 9th. Who says no one is looking at them right now. They exploded years ago, they're not still exploding. If you looked at them now all you'd see, at best, is a remnant. Dozens of such remnants are seen by astronomers every night, at least. Can't have it both ways. Also, lots of astronomers are seeing them in newspapers/TV/internet. Quoting: ACAgain, severe confirmation bias trying to change the plain simple meaning of the claim post-facto. And in that case, hundreds were seen in various images online by astronomers yesterday, not 2. Concluding words: Think out of the box and don't put every word on the gold scale. Quoting: ACIncredible claims require incredible proof. This claim was very specific and straightforward, stop trying to twist it because it's stupid. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Going off of this he could mean anything by that. From witnessing the explosion of a star right next to you, to a supernova lightyears away. Quoting: aliensbro It's straightforward, "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Nowhere in there does it say when the star physically exploded, it's about when you see it. It's self-explanatory and you still don't even understand the conditions of the claim. It doesn't matter if it's right next to you or a million light years away or more. You're desperately trying to re-define the plain simple meaning of the claim because it's a miserable failure. Even an idiot could figure out that it simply means actually seeing a star explode, which is exactly what happens when a new supernova is found. No your reaching for things that aren't said in the phrophecy. It literally says they cee 2 star xplode, and nothing more. And I guarantee atleast 2 astronomers saw 2 stars explode today |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31686426 Germany 01/10/2013 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time! Quoting: Dr. Astro Ha alright, answered my question about the duration of such an event there. I'd have never thought that stars explode so frequently. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31686426 Germany 01/10/2013 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 04:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Defj@m User ID: 7806954 United Kingdom 01/10/2013 04:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | helo Quoting: aliensbro me tel u day be4 me have important thing 2 tel u elders finish calculate they say ok me can tel u this important thing now so me tel u know in best wordings me have lernt on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode yor line time this 2 star xplode is part of yor 2nd witnesing prophesy now u must lisen me very good and lisen warning ok make yorself ready u know lite travel faster than sound ok yes on 9 january yor nasas cee lite of 2 star xplode ok yes elders calculate that from now it is time for sound wave of 2 star xploding come hit earth anyday soon now window open from today til end july yor line time for when wave hits why nasas wait so long 2 tel u on 14 may only about this me not know their reason 4 delay me lern wording sonicboom me tel u know what is coming yor way wil be a cosmosonicboom this sound wave wil change many things and cause big disasters and many sufferings this sound wavings make comets ignite ok this sound wavings make moons forget placing ok this sound wavings make planets lose or change orbit ok there is no more forgivnes earth this thing is coming yor leaders get desperat want escape try use cern but make things worsening but not sure yor leaders try haarp only make earth angry me sory 4 have to tel u this bad news ok sory but elders give some beter news also elders have problem calculate where yor sun wil be position when wave hits if earth is behind sun when wave hit earth sufering wil be much les ok sun wil absorb much damage but then sun damge wil have efect tranfer on earth also but not as big if not behind sun elders not al agree but many say earth wil be behind sun so this some good news ok u just be ready in mind spirit and yor body ok please tel every1 everywhere be ready with body and spirit from today can 1 u please post this front screen to warn me also need leve yor line time soon ok me witnesing completed soon And could be coincidence but Jan 9th.. #1 [link to www.bbc.co.uk] #2 [link to zeenews.india.com] Two supernova explosions first seen and photographed today, jan 9th. So, sound travels in the vacuum of space now? Do you know what a sound wave is? Last Edited by Defj@m on 01/10/2013 04:01 PM When you do things right people won't be sure you've done anything at all |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 04:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Touché OP Piers is a dick but don't send him back to us, use him for target practice or something. lol let him stay I dont care anymore... but for fucks sake make the fucker obtain citizenship!! If you are gonna run your mouth about my countries rights... at least be a citizen! lol either that or deport him to the moon. helo Quoting: aliensbro me tel u day be4 me have important thing 2 tel u elders finish calculate they say ok me can tel u this important thing now so me tel u know in best wordings me have lernt on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode yor line time this 2 star xplode is part of yor 2nd witnesing prophesy now u must lisen me very good and lisen warning ok make yorself ready u know lite travel faster than sound ok yes on 9 january yor nasas cee lite of 2 star xplode ok yes elders calculate that from now it is time for sound wave of 2 star xploding come hit earth anyday soon now window open from today til end july yor line time for when wave hits why nasas wait so long 2 tel u on 14 may only about this me not know their reason 4 delay me lern wording sonicboom me tel u know what is coming yor way wil be a cosmosonicboom this sound wave wil change many things and cause big disasters and many sufferings this sound wavings make comets ignite ok this sound wavings make moons forget placing ok this sound wavings make planets lose or change orbit ok there is no more forgivnes earth this thing is coming yor leaders get desperat want escape try use cern but make things worsening but not sure yor leaders try haarp only make earth angry me sory 4 have to tel u this bad news ok sory but elders give some beter news also elders have problem calculate where yor sun wil be position when wave hits if earth is behind sun when wave hit earth sufering wil be much les ok sun wil absorb much damage but then sun damge wil have efect tranfer on earth also but not as big if not behind sun elders not al agree but many say earth wil be behind sun so this some good news ok u just be ready in mind spirit and yor body ok please tel every1 everywhere be ready with body and spirit from today can 1 u please post this front screen to warn me also need leve yor line time soon ok me witnesing completed soon And could be coincidence but Jan 9th.. #1 [link to www.bbc.co.uk] #2 [link to zeenews.india.com] Two supernova explosions first seen and photographed today, jan 9th. So, sound travels in the vacuum of space now? Do you know what a sound wave is? Think shockwave instead of sonicboom. Sound the trumpets. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1667343 United States 01/10/2013 04:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 04:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Reddwolf User ID: 24577177 United States 01/10/2013 04:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/10/2013 04:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time! Quoting: Dr. Astro Ha alright, answered my question about the duration of such an event there. I'd have never thought that stars explode so frequently. They do. All the time. The universe is very big. Duration depends on the supernova type. Type II are the classical kind where the star actually explodes and forms either a neutron star/pular/or black hole. The explosion itself takes just seconds, but the light from it can take days to diminish (the rate depends on sub-type as well). The other common type, Ia, are due to accretion on a white dwarf and are also very fast events and have even sharper peak luminosities. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 31172160 United States 01/10/2013 04:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They didn't look at these supernovae on January 9th, the explosion itself is long done. Supernovae are very transient events (though they do leave behind remnants that are seen long after which the OP seems to think I was talking about, I wasn't). It's when they discover new ones that they're actually seeing stars explode, and that DOES happen ALL the time! Quoting: Dr. Astro Ha alright, answered my question about the duration of such an event there. I'd have never thought that stars explode so frequently. They do. All the time. The universe is very big. Duration depends on the supernova type. Type II are the classical kind where the star actually explodes and forms either a neutron star/pular/or black hole. The explosion itself takes just seconds, but the light from it can take days to diminish (the rate depends on sub-type as well). The other common type, Ia, are due to accretion on a white dwarf and are also very fast events and have even sharper peak luminosities. Was there a discovery on the 8th? |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/10/2013 04:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/10/2013 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Going off of this he could mean anything by that. From witnessing the explosion of a star right next to you, to a supernova lightyears away. Quoting: aliensbro It's straightforward, "on 9 january yor astronomers cee 2 star xplode." Nowhere in there does it say when the star physically exploded, it's about when you see it. It's self-explanatory and you still don't even understand the conditions of the claim. It doesn't matter if it's right next to you or a million light years away or more. You're desperately trying to re-define the plain simple meaning of the claim because it's a miserable failure. Even an idiot could figure out that it simply means actually seeing a star explode, which is exactly what happens when a new supernova is found. No your reaching for things that aren't said in the phrophecy. It literally says they cee 2 star xplode, and nothing more. And I guarantee atleast 2 astronomers saw 2 stars explode today Nope, you don't get to have it both ways. Either it literally means seeing 2 stars explode for real, which would mean 2 new supernovae discoveries which would not be unusual at all, or it means seeing pictures of 2 supernovae, in which case it's wrong AND meaningless since hundreds are seen by astronomers every single fucking day, not "2." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31807577 01/10/2013 04:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1667343 United States 01/10/2013 04:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Setting aside the fact that no new supernovas have yet been reported for Jan. 9th, do you have any idea how common it is? They're CONSTANTLY finding new ones, often multiple per day! It's not unusual at all, it's a bullshit "prediction" of the normal state of things and even then it hasn't even come true yet! I can accept that. But normally new found supernovae aren't reported in the news, unless they're special. Both seem to be. Neither of the ones mentioned were discovered in 2013, let alone on January 9th. But only now the press reports it. Also, technically astroonomers are seeing the stars explode. Seein doesn't equal discovering. But yeah, no time to panic yet, unless Mandela or Bush Sr. or Thatcher or someone else mentioned in the original thread dies. Well, they are all pretty old and frail ... so chances are actually not out of the realm of possibility. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1667343 United States 01/10/2013 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, so what? The claim was that there would be 2 on the 9th, which would be an average day, but even that is a fail. That should tell you that it's complete bullshit, but for some reason you still don't get it. What time zone was the discovery made in? Time Zones muck everything up. |