UK Prepares For War With Argentina - Military Build up Likely Ahead of Referendum on Falkland Islands Future.

Maybe the Argies will deploy rocky shoreline to scuttle our subs.

Just a lot of political hot air from the Argentine, although the British forces are not at same size of the 1980's military force, they still have a very powerful punch.

It just won't happen.

I must say that while I find the commie KK a lunatic, it's funny how the Brits get all proud about going to war with some lame subdeveloped south american nation. It's probably because of the retarded BS about football, the plebs are so damn ignorant that they cheer about going to war because of sport grudges. Britain is turning into a shit hole filled with third worlders and Brits can't do anything else other than drink like donkeys and cheer for a war with some pathetic subnation. You folks are clueless sometimes (not all, but most).

^^^^
THIS


Argentina will get its ass kicked big time.

They dont even have Exocet missiles anymore.
We have far more superior aircraft then the 80s

We didnt just bomb the shit out of Libya with nothing you know.

If it wasn't for us Brits, who support your Costa Del Sol with our hard earned cash your country would have gone the same way as Greece by now, maybe you should be a bit more grateful hey?

War right now is merely to distract the population that BOTH the UK and Argentina are economically phucked right now

idiocy

JMHO

Our Queen owns your country Aussie.
Remember that.

I don't find it grateful to tell you that you're being smart when you're being dumb, I fully support all that really benefits you, not silly power trip shit that your NWO politicians do to manipulate you.

If you were any smart you'd know where I am coming from.

Last Edited by Manu-K on 01/13/2013 07:06 PM

>>>>It's clear that the Malvinas belong to Argentina<<<<

It's clear that Australia belongs to Indonesia. It's just off their coast FFS.

Time for them to pack their bags in Sydney and head off to New Zealand.

What people don't know is that Thatcher secretly ordered a nuclear armed sub to lie just off the coast .... She threatened to use it and the Argies backed down. True story.

We're being flooded by immigrants because of the idiots in Brussels.
The sooner we leave the EU the sooner we can kick out all the scum that Liebour let in over the last decade without the stupid constraints of the European Union.

But still doesn't change the fact that all the people on here calling out Malvinas and knocking the Brits, happen to be people we have propped up like the Spanish, or countries we still own, like the Aussies.

The Falklands is British territory, there is no way we would stand by and let anyone invade our territory without some sort of retaliation.

After all, we still hold Gibraltar, don't see the Spanish trying to raise an army to take that over do you?

Oh God...not again...

She would have done it too.
We just don't have that caliber of politician nowadays.

Cameron would be our weakest link if the Falklands were invaded.

I am not knocking your right to sovereignty, but some of you still have this imperialistic pride while most of the British imperialistic ventures have benefited everyone but the average British person who sees everyday how his nation turns more into an intolerable hellhole.

Maybe it'd be better for you to stop dreaming of keeping all your far away acquired territories and spend more time fixing your declining culture before there's no solution for that. There won't be any use for the Falklands if Britain becomes a third world shit hole inhabited by mud half wits.

Last Edited by Manu-K on 01/13/2013 07:19 PM

Actually, Thatcher had a nuclear sub parked off the Argentine coast for a different reason.

As Argie Dictator Galtieri had been close to the Reagan administration, Reagan at first wanted to be neutral and refused to give Thatch the satellite data that she needed.

So Thatch went back to Reagan and said WE WILL NOT LOSE THIS WAR. If we lose by land and sea, we'll start blowing Argie cities off the face of the map one by one, starting with Cordoba.

With the Russians supporting Argieland, Reagan went back urgently to Thatch saying, "You do that and it's World War Three and end of the planet"

Thatcher's response to Reagan? "You're choice Buddy"

Within an hour US satellite data began streaming into the UK's Ministry of Defence.

As a result, as the US could not be trusted as an Ally in a Falkland Crisis, the ssame policy has been maintained ever since.

A nuclear sub is always off the coast and the US has been told that the UK won't reconquer the islands again.

Instead, next time, no more Mr. Nice-Guy.

First Argie soldier to land on the Falklands and BANG! Cordoba gets blown straight into the stratosphere...

...just for starters.

ARGentina is already broke.
UK is broke
Let´s make some party for the sheeple
they have no clue really we the banksters are pulling the strings

Well I know it'd be hard to get to that point, but could it happen? it totally could. More weight to the argument that the argie government is insane. In fact most of socialistic south America is really salivating at the prospect of hitting back at what they conceive as imperialistic oppressive powers. And they do have a point there, what they don't have is any fucking means to carry out their desires.

Remember folks , might makes right. Some people tend to lose perspective of that little detail.

That's what I am trying to say, instead I get a Brit going all nationalistic on me with his war pride. Some folks still wanna play the old national rivalries while the NWO is about to decimate the power of Western European peoples worldwide. We're a minority globally and we're about to lose power and these folks still don't get it, they still wish to weaken our side by petty in fighting. These folks frustrate me as much as white libs and their racially tolerant BS.

Last Edited by Manu-K on 01/13/2013 07:25 PM

Its letting go of the Empire and giving up British territories that has got us into the mess we are in today.
There was more pride in Britain when we were an Empire, but we let the do gooders win, we gave back territories, we let land we owned fall and didn't take it back, Thatcher actually changed that when she said "NO, enough is enough!"
She managed to instill some pride back into this country which Blair single handedly destroyed by giving up our constitution to Europe.

So no it wouldn't be a good idea to just let go of another territory, its that mentality that has led us to where we are today.

Argentina might be broke, we are in a recession, but we are a long way from being broke.

I don't know man, I can't tell you for sure what came first, if the loss of land or the loss of appropriate culture, but I can tell you at the exact place you are right now as a nation, it's more crucial for you to regain a true nationalistic control of your country than to keep the Falklands. If you could do both at the same time then great, but I think going into another war will bring you faster towards an Orwellian state, the gov would use it to erode whatever few freedoms you have left.

It's preoccupying that while Americans are so worried, and with reason, with their current situation, you folks are as comfortable as to think about going to war with Argentina. It would seem to me that the prospect of some nationalistic revolution in Britain is null, you folks are totally absorbed by the NWO. I don't think the British people have any say to what goes on to their nation anymore, but maybe you're just too content with being subjects of your rulers.

Look, this is why it is so mega-dangerous...

During the 1950's and 1960s' and 1970's, everyone EXPECTED an all out nuclear war between Russia and the US...so it did not happen.

During the First World War, Germany expected to count on Mexico entering on its side to fight the USA, so USA got tough, posted troops, so it DID NOT HAPPEN.

Exeryone has been EXPECTING a big bust up between Isreal and Iran, yet it HAS NOT HAPPENED.

Why? Because everyone prepares well and is ready.

But the Falkland War came out of the blue. no-one expected it and no-one thought it would ACTUALLY end up in fighting, so IT DID.

Same now.

No-one ACTUALLY thinks the UK would nuke Cordoba so the Argies are prepared to try it on, so...GOD HELP US ALL.

Sounds like you've got a point mate

>>>>Cameron would be our weakest link if the Falklands were invaded.<<<<

You are deeply wrong.

No British Prime Minister would ever, ever. EVER wish to look weak. It is utter suicide in Britain. British voters are ruthless f*kkers who EXPECT a British PM to beat the snot out of "foreign Johnies" wherever possible.

Consider the 1930's. One of the most utterly popular Prime Ministers to have ever been elected, a man who everyone thoroughly loved was Neville Chamberalin...until he allowed Hitler to walk all over him and then he was immediately booted.

In the 1950's, Anthony Eden was super-popular as he had some brilliant ideas about solving the housing problem caused by the Germans bombin gout cities. Then Suez Crisis where he lost. He was kicked out to pels of laughter and hatred.

John Major refused to walk the mile and actually bomb the Serbs in Bosnia - he was branded as weak as water and his Conservative Party were chucked out in their worst ever election defeat that took them a generation to recover from.

If Cameron does not take out Cordoba or blitz the Falklands with paratroops, he knows he's screwed and will be out of office in utter ignomy in hours.

Consider, which Prime Ministers do the working class voters of the UK admire most? Peaceful Atlee who created the National Health Service? Of MacDonald who brought in socialism for the first time to the UK? NAH!

- Winston Churchill who kicked Hitler in the crotch.
- The Duke Of Wellington who beat the snot out of Napoleon and the French.
- Thatcher who kicked the Argies butt round the block.
- Harold Macmillan who gave Britain its first comprehensive nuclear detereent.

With so much talk of south America being a safe haven to survive WW3, imagine if the Argies invade the damned islands, the brits nuke Cordoba or Buenos Aires and then Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Cuba and all of these socialist nations push for war to recover the Islands. Then Iran could get involved in someway and America would jump into the whole thing, then the Russians would come along.....

Its not just a case of giving up the Falkland Islands, if we did that whats to stop the same thing happening in places of strategic interest like Diego Garcia, we still use that as a base for operations, would we just give that up too?

Your trying to mix up too separate issues, defending the Falklands has nothing to do with the state our country is in today, that was down to the shabby mismanagement by the previous Labour government.

Cameron doesn't have any backbone, besides, hes so in tune with the Lib Dems, he might as well just join their party at the next election.
I have never seen such a soft and wishy washy conservative PM.

Oh I see you're also consumed by the two party fake paradigm. I guess you just believe the official story, so go nuke the argies and get into imperialistic wars again while the Muslims take over your nation. Your marines(or whatever they're called) will have a nice surprise when coming back from war and find their nation totally invaded and culturally broken. I wish Western Europeans could join together to preserve our common culture, but people like you who are blinded by the government propaganda and by dreams of imperialistic pride stand between us ever achieving such thing. We have too many enemies to succeed separately and imperialism hasn't brought anything good to our peoples so far, but guess some people never learn. The bankers will keep pulling the strings of people of your nature and you will continue doing their bidding in our detriment. When we fail is due to our own stupidity. But keep believing the hype bro.

Last Edited by Manu-K on 01/13/2013 07:57 PM

Agreed... at least let's hope it's all hot air... BOTH countries are bankrupt and the last thing either us need is a war...