Moon totally on it's side right now | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your "hypothetical" illustrated your complete ignorance. Believing people without proof is fucking insane, and that's apparently all your into. Quoting: broI GAVE YOU FUCKING PROOF, YOU'RE THE ONE WHO BELIEVES PEOPLE LIKE WATERBUG WITHOUT A SHRED OF PROOF! NOW PROVE IT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE? PROVE THOSE PEOPLE WERE THERE. Quoting: broPROVE WHAT? THAT MY HOMETOWN WAS POPULATED? ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID OR WHAT?! YOU CAN SEE THE GODDAMN PADS FROM US1 IN MY HOMETOWN! I'LL TAKE A FUCKING PICTURE FOR YOU NEXT TIME I'M IN TOWN! Your arguments are no more valid than any other without proof, Quoting: fuckingidiot[link to www.astr.ua.edu] Saturn V, lifting off the pad as seen from my hometown. You can clearly see we have a clear line of sight to the pads. That's true even today even though the rockets are shorter as are the pads. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro You people are so fucking stupid! Rollout for Apollo 14 occurred in NOVEMBER 1970! MONTHS BEFORE LAUNCH! IT EVEN MENTIONS THAT FACT ON YOUR OWN FUCKING LINK! "Al Shepard leads his crew across the swing arm after inspecting the Command Module during rollout. 9 November 1970. Scan by J.L. Pickering." [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] DON'T CALL OTHERS STUPID, MORON! is this the photo you waving here KSC-70PC-649 ( 168k ) Al Shepard leads his crew across the swing arm after inspecting the Command Module during rollout. 9 November 1970. Scan by J.L. Pickering. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] or this [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] perhaps this one [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] You are so stupid it hurts, I have a headache now because of your stupidity. The image list was your link dumbass, and more than one photo's description explicitly tells you when rollout happened... months before launch! Newspaper archives confirm it as well. Anyone who lives near the pads knows that they don't roll rockets out the day before launch, they can be seen on the pads for days and weeks before launch, sometimes even longer. That is standard operating procedure, so for you to assume it was only on the pad starting at the dates they attempted a launch shows your extreme ignorance of spaceflight and NASA. FUCKING IDIOT you are! SHOW US THE PHOTO No. 108-KSC-71P-74 on that official page! STUPID DR.ASSHOLE! 108-KSC-71P-74 isn't on that webpage. So what? I have other NASA photos as well in my personal collection (including from Apollo, particularly KSC center photos like 108-KSC-71P-74) that have never been uploaded to the internet on any NASA site. "If it's not on the internet it's not official/doesn't exist" is not a logical or rational claim. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your "hypothetical" illustrated your complete ignorance. Believing people without proof is fucking insane, and that's apparently all your into. Quoting: broI GAVE YOU FUCKING PROOF, YOU'RE THE ONE WHO BELIEVES PEOPLE LIKE WATERBUG WITHOUT A SHRED OF PROOF! NOW PROVE IT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE? PROVE THOSE PEOPLE WERE THERE. Quoting: broPROVE WHAT? THAT MY HOMETOWN WAS POPULATED? ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID OR WHAT?! YOU CAN SEE THE GODDAMN PADS FROM US1 IN MY HOMETOWN! I'LL TAKE A FUCKING PICTURE FOR YOU NEXT TIME I'M IN TOWN! Your arguments are no more valid than any other without proof, Quoting: fuckingidiot[link to www.astr.ua.edu] Saturn V, lifting off the pad as seen from my hometown. You can clearly see we have a clear line of sight to the pads. That's true even today even though the rockets are shorter as are the pads. Did I ask for proof of a population? Did I ask for proof you had eyesight? Yes its true even today you can still see the pads cause they exist. Wow astro. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27411957 United States 01/18/2013 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32507838 DON'T CALL OTHERS STUPID, MORON! is this the photo you waving here KSC-70PC-649 ( 168k ) Al Shepard leads his crew across the swing arm after inspecting the Command Module during rollout. 9 November 1970. Scan by J.L. Pickering. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] or this [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] perhaps this one [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] You are so stupid it hurts, I have a headache now because of your stupidity. The image list was your link dumbass, and more than one photo's description explicitly tells you when rollout happened... months before launch! Newspaper archives confirm it as well. Anyone who lives near the pads knows that they don't roll rockets out the day before launch, they can be seen on the pads for days and weeks before launch, sometimes even longer. That is standard operating procedure, so for you to assume it was only on the pad starting at the dates they attempted a launch shows your extreme ignorance of spaceflight and NASA. FUCKING IDIOT you are! SHOW US THE PHOTO No. 108-KSC-71P-74 on that official page! STUPID DR.ASSHOLE! 108-KSC-71P-74 isn't on that webpage. So what? I have other NASA photos as well in my personal collection (including from Apollo, particularly KSC center photos like 108-KSC-71P-74) that have never been uploaded to the internet on any NASA site. "If it's not on the internet it's not official/doesn't exist" is not a logical or rational claim. True but if it exists as a NASA image in your collection and not in NASA's.. it's probably fake.. Lmao what a fucking idiot. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your "hypothetical" illustrated your complete ignorance. Believing people without proof is fucking insane, and that's apparently all your into. Quoting: broI GAVE YOU FUCKING PROOF, YOU'RE THE ONE WHO BELIEVES PEOPLE LIKE WATERBUG WITHOUT A SHRED OF PROOF! NOW PROVE IT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE? PROVE THOSE PEOPLE WERE THERE. Quoting: broPROVE WHAT? THAT MY HOMETOWN WAS POPULATED? ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID OR WHAT?! YOU CAN SEE THE GODDAMN PADS FROM US1 IN MY HOMETOWN! I'LL TAKE A FUCKING PICTURE FOR YOU NEXT TIME I'M IN TOWN! Your arguments are no more valid than any other without proof, Quoting: fuckingidiot[link to www.astr.ua.edu] Saturn V, lifting off the pad as seen from my hometown. You can clearly see we have a clear line of sight to the pads. That's true even today even though the rockets are shorter as are the pads. Did I ask for proof of a population? Did I ask for proof you had eyesight? Yes its true even today you can still see the pads cause they exist. Wow astro. They had clear line of sight to the pads from my hometown, everyone could see it out there on the pad. You can still see the pads today, of course the structures have changed over time to accomidate space shuttles and are changing again to accomidate future heavy lift rockets similar to the Saturn V, but they just rebuild it on the same location, the same pads. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your "hypothetical" illustrated your complete ignorance. Believing people without proof is fucking insane, and that's apparently all your into. Quoting: broI GAVE YOU FUCKING PROOF, YOU'RE THE ONE WHO BELIEVES PEOPLE LIKE WATERBUG WITHOUT A SHRED OF PROOF! NOW PROVE IT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE? PROVE THOSE PEOPLE WERE THERE. Quoting: broPROVE WHAT? THAT MY HOMETOWN WAS POPULATED? ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID OR WHAT?! YOU CAN SEE THE GODDAMN PADS FROM US1 IN MY HOMETOWN! I'LL TAKE A FUCKING PICTURE FOR YOU NEXT TIME I'M IN TOWN! Your arguments are no more valid than any other without proof, Quoting: fuckingidiot[link to www.astr.ua.edu] Saturn V, lifting off the pad as seen from my hometown. You can clearly see we have a clear line of sight to the pads. That's true even today even though the rockets are shorter as are the pads. Did I ask for proof of a population? Did I ask for proof you had eyesight? Yes its true even today you can still see the pads cause they exist. Wow astro. They had clear line of sight to the pads from my hometown, everyone could see it out there on the pad. You can still see the pads today, of course the structures have changed over time to accomidate space shuttles and are changing again to accomidate future heavy lift rockets similar to the Saturn V, but they just rebuild it on the same location, the same pads. Why are you telling me this? ... What the fuck is this proof of astro? Ok so the rocket launch site is not invisible.. great now lets tackle the next question.. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro You are so stupid it hurts, I have a headache now because of your stupidity. The image list was your link dumbass, and more than one photo's description explicitly tells you when rollout happened... months before launch! Newspaper archives confirm it as well. Anyone who lives near the pads knows that they don't roll rockets out the day before launch, they can be seen on the pads for days and weeks before launch, sometimes even longer. That is standard operating procedure, so for you to assume it was only on the pad starting at the dates they attempted a launch shows your extreme ignorance of spaceflight and NASA. FUCKING IDIOT you are! SHOW US THE PHOTO No. 108-KSC-71P-74 on that official page! STUPID DR.ASSHOLE! 108-KSC-71P-74 isn't on that webpage. So what? I have other NASA photos as well in my personal collection (including from Apollo, particularly KSC center photos like 108-KSC-71P-74) that have never been uploaded to the internet on any NASA site. "If it's not on the internet it's not official/doesn't exist" is not a logical or rational claim. True but if it exists as a NASA image in your collection and not in NASA's.. it's probably fake.. Lmao what a fucking idiot. NASA has them in their collection as well you idiot, just not online. And jumping to the conclusion that "it's probably fake" is not logical statement nor is it supported by any evidence. If you want a copy of 108-KSC-71P-74 or any other KSC photo, call the public affairs office and ask for it! 321.867.5000 Go ahead, knock yourselves out! Not all research is done on the internet you morons. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Your "hypothetical" illustrated your complete ignorance. ... I GAVE YOU FUCKING PROOF, YOU'RE THE ONE WHO BELIEVES PEOPLE LIKE WATERBUG WITHOUT A SHRED OF PROOF! ... PROVE WHAT? THAT MY HOMETOWN WAS POPULATED? ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID OR WHAT?! YOU CAN SEE THE GODDAMN PADS FROM US1 IN MY HOMETOWN! I'LL TAKE A FUCKING PICTURE FOR YOU NEXT TIME I'M IN TOWN! ... [link to www.astr.ua.edu] Saturn V, lifting off the pad as seen from my hometown. You can clearly see we have a clear line of sight to the pads. That's true even today even though the rockets are shorter as are the pads. Did I ask for proof of a population? Did I ask for proof you had eyesight? Yes its true even today you can still see the pads cause they exist. Wow astro. They had clear line of sight to the pads from my hometown, everyone could see it out there on the pad. You can still see the pads today, of course the structures have changed over time to accomidate space shuttles and are changing again to accomidate future heavy lift rockets similar to the Saturn V, but they just rebuild it on the same location, the same pads. Why are you telling me this? ... What the fuck is this proof of astro? Ok so the rocket launch site is not invisible.. great now lets tackle the next question.. Because, everyone saw the rocket out on the pad. There is no way NASA could have lied about when they rolled out the Saturn V. It happened in November 1970, months before launch. End of story. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't want a copy as it serves no purpose.. it's digital imagery astro. When are you gonna realize pictures are not proof? That's like saying obviously tom cruise is ascended.. he was in war of the worlds. Quoting: aliensbro It's up to you to prove it's fake. Otherwise there is no reason to assume it is fake. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't want a copy as it serves no purpose.. it's digital imagery astro. When are you gonna realize pictures are not proof? That's like saying obviously tom cruise is ascended.. he was in war of the worlds. Quoting: aliensbro It's up to you to prove it's fake. Otherwise there is no reason to assume it is fake. On top of that I was just asked for a NASA source of the image. There it is. Now shut the fuck up. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't want a copy as it serves no purpose.. it's digital imagery astro. When are you gonna realize pictures are not proof? That's like saying obviously tom cruise is ascended.. he was in war of the worlds. Quoting: aliensbro It's up to you to prove it's fake. Otherwise there is no reason to assume it is fake. On top of that I was just asked for a NASA source of the image. There it is. Now shut the fuck up. I've been telling you from the start of this thread to put your nasa photo album away.. lol. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't get it, it IS evidence, in order for you to disregard it you must have a LOGICAL reason to do so, or you're not being rational. The burden of proof is on YOU to prove that it's fake. Same as the amateur image which you also ignore. You don't get to assume everything is fake just because it disagrees with your beliefs. I assume things that disagree with my beliefs are real until I prove they're fake, hence the whole point of debunking things like this. I assumed the claim was true, I went out and found pictures like this one that show it is not. Last Edited by Astromut on 01/18/2013 04:32 PM |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You just spent the last ten minutes arguing with me as if they could have. You're a fucking moron. Arguing the point that you couldn't prove any of the things you had said. Any still haven't.. Still not seeing where i'm wrong here lol I proved the things I said already. Just because you automatically reject any evidence that disagrees with you means nothing. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't get it, it IS evidence, in order for you to disregard it you must have a LOGICAL reason to do so, or you're not being rational. The burden of proof is on YOU to prove that it's fake. Same as the amateur image which you also ignore. You don't get to assume everything is fake just because it disagrees with your beliefs. I assume things that disagree with my beliefs are real until I prove they're fake, hence the whole point of debunking things like this. I assumed the claim was true, I went out and found pictures like this one that show it is not. I do have a logical reason to do so. I disregard it because i'm in an argument with someone who would be helped by the contents of the picture. That's all the reason needed to assume it's fake. If you wanna assume shit is real and go around trying to prove everything real vs fake your in for a terrible life lmao. Most people wait til they doubt something before trying to prove it fake. There's just no reason to assume a picture is evidence of anything. I can fake a thousand photos of any type of event you want so I don't see how your holding this as intangible proof. I damn sure don't understand your want to continue in an argument with someone you deemed fucking stupid. One would assume someone who is fucking stupid would have nothing intellectually to offer you, so why are you here still? To say I can't think something is fake because I don't have a reason to is stupid, who defines what a reason would be to assume something is fake? This argument is just so fucking stupid and we got to this point because you wanted to be right about small points in your arguments. Like the visibility of a launch pad.. lmao. |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You just spent the last ten minutes arguing with me as if they could have. You're a fucking moron. Arguing the point that you couldn't prove any of the things you had said. Any still haven't.. Still not seeing where i'm wrong here lol I proved the things I said already. Just because you automatically reject any evidence that disagrees with you means nothing. HOW IS A PICTURE PROOF? Can you hold it up and say, there is NO WAY that i'm coming to any other conclusion than the right one, based on the fact that there is NO WAY someone could've doctored this evidence. If you can't, then you haven't proven anything. And you most certainly are not able to do this with your argument |
aliensbro (OP) User ID: 32040337 United States 01/18/2013 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't get it, it IS evidence, in order for you to disregard it you must have a LOGICAL reason to do so, or you're not being rational. The burden of proof is on YOU to prove that it's fake. Same as the amateur image which you also ignore. You don't get to assume everything is fake just because it disagrees with your beliefs. I assume things that disagree with my beliefs are real until I prove they're fake, hence the whole point of debunking things like this. I assumed the claim was true, I went out and found pictures like this one that show it is not. I do have a logical reason to do so. I disregard it because i'm in an argument with someone who would be helped by the contents of the picture. Holy shit, that is not a logical reason, but that is a transparent revealing of your fucking bias. I can fake a thousand photos of any type of event you want so I don't see how your holding this as intangible proof. Quoting: fuckingbiasedidiotFine, fake a photo of the fucking moon, get in a time machine, publish it in a book 20 years ago, and then take a video of the book you published 20 years ago and make sure I can find it in a library myself and verify you published it 20 years ago if I so choose. I'm willing to bet you don't have a fucking time machine. I damn sure don't understand your want to continue in an argument with someone you deemed fucking stupid. Quoting: broBecause statements such as this "I disregard it because i'm in an argument with someone who would be helped by the contents of the picture" are incredibly telling, useful, and revealing. I would do this 20x over just to get a statement like that out of you. I'm not doing this for your benefit, that's for damn sure. One would This argument is just so fucking stupid and we got to this point because you wanted to be right about small points in your arguments. Like the visibility of a launch pad.. lmao. Quoting: broYou know, rather than obsess about trying to prove me wrong on "small points" in my arguments where I'm clearly right, maybe you should shut up and start learning from me instead. You won't of course, but the amazingly revealing statements you make are worth it anwyay. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro You just spent the last ten minutes arguing with me as if they could have. You're a fucking moron. Arguing the point that you couldn't prove any of the things you had said. Any still haven't.. Still not seeing where i'm wrong here lol I proved the things I said already. Just because you automatically reject any evidence that disagrees with you means nothing. HOW IS A PICTURE PROOF? Can you hold it up and say, there is NO WAY that i'm coming to any other conclusion than the right one, based on the fact that there is NO WAY someone could've doctored this evidence. If you can't, then you haven't proven anything. And you most certainly are not able to do this with your argument There is NO logical reason to assume fakery of a photo taken 40 years ago, published in a book 20 years ago, when this phenomenon is supposedly new to within the last decade. If it didn't happen back then, there is no logical reason to assume they would fake a photo to make the moon look normal in a horizontal position if it really wasn't a normal position for the moon to be in. It's up to you to prove they faked it, or accept it, your choice. There is no logical alternative. Even worse for you, I also showed you an amateur photo published over 20 years ago as well. So now you can't even make ad hominem appeals to "NASA" as being untrustworthy. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 01/18/2013 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fine, fake a photo of the fucking moon, get in a time machine, publish it in a book 20 years ago, and then take a video of the book you published 20 years ago and make sure I can find it in a library myself and verify you published it 20 years ago if I so choose. Quoting: Dr. Astro I'm willing to bet you don't have a fucking time machine. Good luck... |