Sandy Hook AR-15 hoax? Still no school surveillance footage released
There are a lot of mysteries out there, and they deserve to be explored and questioned: Why is there still mercury in vaccines? Why did the WTC 7 building implode and fall when no airplane hit it? If the government can create money from nothing, why are we still paying taxes?
And today, I'm adding to that list this commonsense question: Why has no surveillance footage been released from the Sandy Hook shooting, showing Adam Lanza blasting away with an AR-15?
Here's why the non-release of this video footage is so interesting:
Every time a school shooting takes place, one of the very first things that gets released to the media is the school surveillance footage depicting the gun and the shooter. The purpose of this is to associate the pain and anguish of the massacre to the image of a scary-looking rifle.
In mere days after the Columbine shooting in 1998, for example, the media received footage from the massacre and began playing it over and over again, hammering home the images of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold with their guns. The same is true with numerous other school shootings as you'll see below.
Russell Scott ONLY interviews the best, the brightest and the most-brilliant in their field.
Russell has interviewed: The inventor of the world's first working home cold-fusion reactor; Andrea Rossi, elongated skulls expert; Brien Foerster, Back to the Future actor; Crispin Glover, former-director of 'Project Stargate'; Dale Graff, Saved by the Light author; Dannion Brinkley, geo-politicist; F. William Engdahl, trends-forecaster; Gerald Celente, author of The Creature from Jekyll Island; G. Edward Griffin, BBC investigative journalist; Greg Palast, founder of The Venus Project; Jacque Fresco, mathematics professor; Jim Stein, cosmologist; Lawrence M. Krauss, political analyst; Webster Tarpley and hundreds more.
Re: Sandy Hook AR-15 hoax? Still no school surveillance footage released
The article below, just proves that all the reports and quotes that the AR-15 wasn't used, in Aurora, or that a shotgun was also used, but would someone need two rifles if they had an AR-15 with them? I don't know, but the young kid (who resides just down the block from Sandy Hook) in the article below was hit by "shot-gun" pellets (rock-salt?) in Aurora, not an AR-15, note photo #2 in articles slideshow: [link to www.washingtonpost.com]
Video below shows the later news report that "no assault rife" was used inside the SH school, only pistols, but everyone is still running with the rifle belief, even so many of the experts, like the BullHorn guy from Austin Texas, why? This media outlet is doing their job, but it is not getting traction.
Canada
United States
