LOL
???

It's interesting, they (scientists) are giving him props on the math, yet say he needs to learn more about the field to which he is applying his methodology, and make contributions before throwing out a theory. As they follow up with estimates are constantly refined based on logic, understanding, observational data. So I guess the BBT is open for error. Interesting that some are saying the theory about carbon is being overlooked.

Aspergers kids are for the most part, pragmatic thinkers. So in this case it's good because he isn't invested emotionally, one way or another.