Man who helped Sandy Hook kids is harassed by conspiracy theorists

You can tell by how you insult people that do not agree with you. You follow the mainstream propaganda that if you think differently you're stupid or insane. You do that.

Parents that have their children slaughtered by a "crazy gunman" should be acting like it.

None of the people interview cried.

How did the principal give a statement to the newspaper when she was supposedly killed by the "gunman?"

Did he kill her in the office since they let him in or did he shoot his way into the building?

Obvious hack job of a flase-flag event.

This is one of the big problems in any situation or crisis.

People don't understand the "fog of War" phenomenon in real terms, so when they here conflicting data they can't put it into perspective. Ergo, it must be a lie.

What they don't understand is that the modern press changes what people say, for a host of reasons (not all of them sinister at all, most just having to do with the best sound bite and time constraints) which can totally change the apparent meaning of what was said.

A man takes in some kids during an emergency and recounts his story.

In one place he talks about the six kids (the total) and in another mentions five. He could have misspoken, or it could be the remainder of the children or an account of what only five of them did, but lacking thew whole story people at home can't see it.

So obviously the man is not telling the truth, right? You can check the tape! Six in one place, five in another... Sinister!

And we know what lies mean right? In a case like this, it has to mean the worst thing possible. Always.

Except of course, that it doesn't really.

Sometimes the press just reports the wrong thing. Sometimes they make stuff up for a better story and often witnesses say things that make sense to them, but not to the people at home, that weren't there.

Fuck that lieing piece of shit. Was it 5 or 6? Oh, he just forgot, how convenient. Hey, I've got a bridge to sell you.

Right... Not everything.

Not like Robbie Parker faking it and getting into character. Or Rosen pretending to cry and never producing any tears. None of them cried tears. They're all lying actors.

These people are some very bad actors.

Fuck that lieing piece of shit. Was it 5 or 6? Oh, he just forgot, how convenient. Hey, I've got a bridge to sell you.

the point of the thread is that nobody is buying into this thing or Rosen's part.

nobody is falling for this and the response is incredible.

That makes no sense whatsoever.

Me and my kind? A lot of lies to work through?

I don't really care what you believe, I am only giving you friendly advice to up your discernment skills.

Play the What's more likely game.

Is it more likely that:

A)The government, at a huge huge risk, set the whole thing up, the people may or may not be dead, and everyone is in on it including crisis actors all to try and get a ban on semi auto firearms...

or

B)The government as Rham Emanuel said, will use tragedies to push an agenda. Not let it go to waste. A real tragedy happened and they pounce all over it, to try and further their agenda. Then, no risk to them, no needing to keep secrets, no trying to keep a whole town isolated from the rest of the country to keep them from talking. They can use the media to cover the story 24/7 to keep it in the publics mind.


Any sane rational thinker would choose B.

Yes, Rosen is probably an actor in the situation, and they are playing it up- it's a bad move to attack him- now they're going to start saying conspiracy theorist say no children died, when there is ample proof that they did-

I am going to post this interview later on today in it's own thread when i have time- but this is an interview with a woman that lives 4 miles away from the school...she's monitored everything she can, knows some survivors, etc- kids really died! But that doesn't mean actors and staging were not involved. This is a satanic ritual folks! The whole point of it being a ritual sacrifice is that they actually do, really kill people!

Either he deserves it, or he is collateral damage. Allow no remorse. There will be innocent victims, it's inevitable. For the greater Good.

From a strategic point of view, the genuinely innocent who are targeted do great serving. Because they aren't trained to handle pressure and gang-stalking, and they got no support, neither the infra-structure to escape. When they are picked on, they will make obvious mistakes. That will convince the mindless sheep that there is in fact a conspiracy going on.

It's ironic, but it will work. And for now, that is all that counts.

i am not convinced that anybody died, especially children.

there is photographic evidence that suggests the kids were very much alive after the alleged shooting.

i think it makes it easier for actors to get on board and stay on board if there are no actual murders involved.

remember, these people think the general population are complete idiots and they are superior in intellect that most.

Either he deserves it, or he is collateral damage. Allow no remorse. There will be innocent victims, it's inevitable. For the greater Good.

From a strategic point of view, the genuinely innocent who are targeted do great serving. Because they aren't trained to handle pressure and gang-stalking, and they got no support, neither the infra-structure to escape. When they are picked on, they will make obvious mistakes. That will convince the mindless sheep that there is in fact a conspiracy going on.

It's ironic, but it will work. And for now, that is all that counts.

but seriously, nobody should be harassing anyone for any reason. that is definitely not the way to handle the situation.

:blackcat: He's 69 for crying out loud.

SO, my neighbor is 86 and has a memory sharp as a tack.

I'm sure that soon there will be a story coming out that he is suffering from beginning stages of Alzhemers and thats why he can't keep his story straight.

but seriously, nobody should be harassing anyone for any reason. that is definitely not the way to handle the situation.