Man who helped Sandy Hook kids is harassed by conspiracy theorists

NOT EVEN ONE REAL TEAR RUNNING DOWN A CHEEK IN ALL THE INTERVIEWS AND PRESS CONFERENCES BY THOSE INVOLVED.

There's your answer

Ever heard of extreme coercion !

We have pics of your kids going to school .... wanna help us out ?

sj, your posts are always spot on.

He may be a fake or an actor, and maybe the truth will out about his role in this. I believe there is a conspiracy here, but maybe this dude is genuine. I have to admit I haven't seen the video of him talking and crying or changing his story. But if I found 6 traumatized kids my first concern would be making them safe and them contacting the police, then their parents individually. So quiet the kids down comfort them distract them. Toys distract kids. So spend two minutes getting toys, sit them down where you can see them, the hit the phones. Where does the pedophile angle come in? Do pedophiles usually abuse kids in front of other kids? Kids they know are going to be questioned to hell and back. I don't want to insult you , but I don't follow your reasoning on the pedophile angle.

O.K. there's just 1 Eugene Rosen in Sandy Hook, but this Intellius search result for Gene Rosen in Newtown says they found 17 in Newtown, CT
[link to www.intelius.com]

It's in big green letters at the top. That is suspicious and why does your Eugene Rosen have an I for a middle initial when the other news story have it as S?
I bet there are more than 17 Gene Rosen's in the whole country, so think that over a bit. I searched for Newtown, CT and got 17. That's a fact. I live in a much bigger town, and when I searched my name, there was just me. My last name is fairly common too.

thanks OP.

dirty fuckers like NAM are shitters.

Maybe it had to be done in a very specific way (e. g., date, time, particulars). We know the luciferians/illuminutties are constantly trying to set up "spells" to try and make their desired goals come to pass. We see this in movies, TV, even commercials.

So, no, they could not just wait for some massacre to happen, so they could milk it for their own purposes. They had to MAKE a fake bloodbath, and we will probably be hearing about all the "consequences" of Sandy Hoax for quite some time.

But we'll know the truth. Well, not you, but people who give it half a moment's thought.

I'm disappointed in you.

Have you watched video after video of the parents of 6 year olds brutally shot to death, laughing a smiling? I still have not seen a tear from anyone in this crowd! They're either the World's Most Gosh Darn Positive People or something is seriously wrong with this picture.

Do you mean to say you are really buying this steaming pile of horseshit?

I honestly believe they will do another in order to distract from Sandy Hook and to push harder for gun control.

Isn't opa Dutch for Grandfather? Your hacking on someone's Grandfather? Jeeze chill man.

Best thread on the forums in the past few months.

This is what happens when people take absolutely shaky conspiracy theory's with little to no evidence too far. Leave this man alone. Leave Sandyhook alone. It was not some government planned agenda to ban military style assault weapons.

The problem is the entire story that he told, makes ZERO sense. It makes no sense that a school bus driver is going to take children, in a panic situation, right past a firehouse and into some stranger's home. That's not logical imo.

He also sometimes mentioned just a bus driver, sometimes a bus driver and a teacher, sometimes he referred to the bus driver or/and teacher as male, sometimes female. This is not mis-speaking imo. And it's not the press reporting here, it's all coming directly from him.

I don't know. who would have enough toys for 6 kids anyway?. Even if he was a grandad.
My Grandad never had loads of childrens toys lying around to hand.

And they were still in the living room during the interview. Very handy. I saw the video an he was fucking fake.

I only heard one version of his story because I only listened once. And it still was weird.

He said he saw these little kids sitting in a perfect circle in his driveway. So, he went to talk to them and they said someone shot their teacher. Then he took them inside and gave them stuffed animals and asked questions. Eventually, he got their phone numbers from the bus driver.

It may have all happened just like that, but it's kind of an odd story. Most people would call the school or the cops or parents or someone. As in immediately. He made it sound like some time passed.

Anyway, I would never bother anyone. However, just being on TV gets attention both good and bad. Not everyone is like me. But, still... this guy is a bit of a drama queen. I mean, if I spent the day with 5 to 6 traumatized kids, I wouldn't be too interested in telling that tale on TV. I'd be, hello, upset for the kids!

How do they know he was being called and harrassed by conspiracy theorists? Maybe it was disinfo agents pretending to be conspiracy theorists in order to make real conspiracy theorists look bad?

Nope, not a single tear. People will say, "Everyone grieves in their own way." Well, if that's the case, why aren't ANY of these parents crying and sad and distraught? Why were they ALL smiling and laughing? Seems to me they're all grieving in the SAME way.

Does shilling bring you a good living? Do your friends and family know what you do? If I wondered before, and I know this is shallow, but your photo made you look like a good guy, then I'm sure now, and will remember whenever I see your name - you are a shill!

Know how I know? Because you don't give any room for speculation. You don't say, "Well, maybe I could see where people would wonder, given the COMPLETE LACK of proof." No, you blather about this situation as if the coverage had actually shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that something had happened to anyone.

Guess you can use that info for your next assignment!

:money:

(Maybe that's not really your picture. Your bosses probably think having a picture of a regular guy makes you more believeable. Not any more!)

Wow.

It doesn't sound like you've done your homework.

I'm not going to get roped in to laying it all out there, but you can look at the 10 threads I posted for a start.

Comments like yours are pointless because they bring absolutely nothing of value to the discussion.

You cannot be considered a psychologist with a B. A.

Also, the theater? Interesting!

Sorry man, I had to leave the office for a bit, didn't see your responses.

Anyway, I just don't believe that this is a hoax. For many reasons.

I do fully believe the government will and is taking full advantage of the tragedy to push through their anti gun agenda. They have openly admitted that they will not let a good crisis go to waste.

It doesn't add up to me being a hoax. The amount of people who would be in on it would be quite large. It would be a huge risk to stage such an event. When it's sooo simple for "them" to wait for a nut to pull something off, and then put 24/7 media coverage on it. Have talking heads start calling for gun control, etc etc

As for the first reports changing after some time passed, the way the news works now a days, every media outlet wants to be the first one on the scene, wants to be the first to report new info. So they start reporting rumors before facts come out, then must go back and cover their tracks from reporting rumors.

That is how the media has operated the past few yrs. It increasingly gets worse.

Also I cannot and will not believe it's a hoax based on interviewees not crying, or acting strange. Anyone who has been through a tragedy understands there is no "norm" to how people react. There's a wide range of strange behavior people express when going through something like this.

9-11 is quite different. There are many material facts about that case that just don't make sense.

Also, it's not like I have slammed shut the story, and no longer am willing to hear/see new evidence. But to this point my thoughts are that it is not a hoax, but being used.

Listen, I could be wrong. I am not soo arrogant as to claim I am all knowing, I just have my own ways of discerning truth from fiction, and this case doesn't hit as a hoax to me.

So, the first set of 'parents' are moving as they have to see the Lanza house from theirs, sorry too fucking convenient, let's see how many other ' parents' feel the need to move now
[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

Last Edited by F F S on 01/15/2013 04:43 PM

Do a search for Gene Rosen for the entire United States. Intelius gives you 17 matches. [link to www.intelius.com]

BLASPHEMER!!!

#1 My picture was never me genius, it's from breaking bad.

#2 The shill line is done got old, there are too many members here that I have shared photos and personal info with that know.

#3 I wish I would of seen this post before I gave you the time of day of actually trying to honestly respond to you.

Edit to add: I would be a horrible shill if I believed the government was taking advantage of this to push gun control and adamently disprove of such measures.

Last Edited by *Evan on 01/15/2013 04:48 PM

The criteria by which so many people judge a conspiracy theory on this web-site is ABSURD.

Since I've been on GLP , I have seen a conspiracy for EVERY....SINGLE THING. Every recent earthquake, every near by comet or asteroid that comes close to earth, every SINGLE mass shooting, pretty much ANYTHING that makes the NEWS, a great many of people on here immediately turn it into a conspiracy theory. Are people really THAT paranoid? Some of these individuals are ADULTS. I can understand a misguided child thinking that way, but a NON-Schizophrenic ADULT shouldn't jump to conclusions like that.

We all know that events that happen on the global level don't always get reported accurately on the news. We also know that in life, there are almost ALWAYS hidden agendas and hidden INTENTION behind things. However, when you blatantly and foolishly call EVERYTHING a conspiracy, it just goes to show you are PARANOID, and your paranoia actually makes you OBLIVIOUS to the TRUTH around you.



There is no "conspiracy" behind Sandy Hook. As someone else mentioned, the media just did a terrible job fact checking. Why? Because a story as big as Sandy Hook means they need to jump on it ASAP, every second wasted cost them ratings, etc. The media therefore , in their eagerness to break the story and keep updated on it and compete with other media sources, misquotes people, and gets some facts skewed.

This happens ALL THE TIME in media. I challenge any of you to watch the sitcom Newsroom, it will open your eyes to how things work in the media. Or, watch a documentary on how it works. Knowledge is power.



So again, I will say: THERE IS NO CONSPIRACY with sandy hook. Did some eager politicians, who have an agenda, JUMP on the Sandy Hook disaster, and use it for their own political gain? OF COURSE. Politicians have been doing this civilization started. Anything that grabs peoples attention, politicians will use to further their agenda.

however, Sandy Hook happened. The "conspiracy" isn't Sandy Hook.....it is the fact that the crisis is being used to further the agenda of some powerful people.

That brings up a good point. Is this an example, like Anderson Cooper making a big deal out of the fake murder story on 1/11, of the luciferians trying to actually bring ATTENTION to this story?

I mean, they are crazy, and it sort of seems like they arranged this fake massacre so badly - it almost seems as if they WANT us to know it was a hoax, and to MAKE a big deal out of it!

Is this designed to be a major distraction from something else?

I completely agree with you.

Well said.

you mean thanks google?

I hope you're not their "go-to" guy, 'cause you're not doing very well.