Man who helped Sandy Hook kids is harassed by conspiracy theorists

Would it surprise you if the majority of people gangstalking Rosen are from GLP?


I hope Trinity sees this thread, and perhaps makes a post about gangstalking.

It is one thing to come on this web-site after work, blow off some steam, and/or engage in wishful thinking and "what ifs"

It is another thing entirely to harass a man because YOU don't believe his story.



To be honest, I'm not convinced ANYTHING about the guy is right. He certainly did contradict himself in MANY of the interviews. He is also a psychologist (or was), and seems like a shady character. HOWEVER, everyone calling this man or e-mailing him to harass him should be charged accordingly. Whether we believe him or not, it is not OUR job to harass him, insult him, yell at him, and BOMBARD his phone and e-mail.

I hope you all realize that, just like "youknowwho"'s interview with Piers Morgan (his YELLING and insults), harassing this man does NOTHING for the 'community' here at GLP, or alternative history/alternative news/conspiracy theorists, etc.



If you don't believe the official story, which is understandable, then POST about it. BLOG about it. Make a youtube video. Get YOUR voice out there. Freedom of speech exists in the United States for that purpose. To be able to have your voice heard, without fear of legal repurcussions.


Harassing an individual that you don't believe, or agree with, is trashy. It makes us ALL look bad.

so, what exactly are we to do with this information?

Last Edited by Mordier L'eft on 01/15/2013 06:17 PM

WTF are you babbling about?

i've already talked to one of the Mods about this.

report any suggestion of gang-stalking...i'm told there will be strict action taken.

I don't buy what DGB sells, but the Arizona address did stand out to me.

The biggest problem I'm seeing with this is that it can go too far. How far will people go to 'get the truth'? What if the truth is staring you right in the face, but is not being listened too? Who will take responsibility if it gets too far? It's very easy to not be able to discern properly because of so many inconsistent stories out there. Some people are too much in the mind and thoughts and have forgotten how to know the truth from deep within their hearts. I know because I too have been there from reading this website, so I understand. There are times one must step back and step away from it in order to absorb and reflect on one's findings.

I've learned a lot from this site, but there's still a boundary that I need to have to separate fact from fiction. A boundary that makes me detached enough without getting caught up, but it takes time to learn that too.

In the end, we must ask ourselves why does it even bother us? Why is this really so important to us that we must know? Why do the inconsistencies being reported by the media bother us in the first place? My guess is that no one likes to be lied to and we just want plain ol' honesty. Then again, I could be wrong.

derka derka snackbar lalalalalalallaallala

What exactly is gang stalking?

Is asking relevant questions about a person with apparent credibilty issues related to an extremely important incident considered gang stalking?

If somebody is threatening the guy, let them be prosecuted for it.

I'm exercising my right to free speech by questioning the veracity of his statements.

Don't try to stereotype every person that posts on glp as a stalker. That is ridiculous.

Have any of you ever thought that it could be the paid alphabet agency shills doing the harassing , to blame us theorists, maybe think about that before spouting off, and as other poster says show the mails , give em to the cops and Feds and then we'll see

I agree that this man is being stalked and that this must stop now.

i'm not calling everyone on GLP a stalker

i'm calling people who advocate gang-stalking, and people who post confidential information to the public with the hopes that some vague action will be taken stalker.

and when there's more than one person doing it, at more than one location, that makes them a gang-stalker.

did i call YOU a stalker? cuz i don't recall that.

and this man IS looking to prosecute for this offence. the problem is that all the crisis-actor-tards start bellowing and screaming that their freedom of speech is being impugned when this is mentioned.



Last Edited by Mordier L'eft on 01/15/2013 06:24 PM

"
In the end, we must ask ourselves why does it even bother us? Why is this really so important to us that we must know? "



You sir just asked two of the most important questions anyone could ever ask themselves. I've studied alternative history, news, conspiracy theories, occultist, and a wide range of topics dealing with an esoteric look at human history for over 15 years. One thing I've learned, is that truth IS in the eyes of the beholder. Truth IS relative. Sure....an absolute truth exists, but so long as you are a living being, and you are PERCEIVING reality.....you can only know RELATIVE truth. Why? Because the very act of perception itself is deceptive. To perceive something, you must be separate from it. The very ACT of perceiving turns what Is, into a relative interpretation.


Having said that, I learned not so long ago that even the people I once thought were at the top of it all, you know, call them illuminati, or whatever you want.....even they believe they are doing GOOD. They believe they are doing RIGHT. And after you meet a few people who actually do hold real power on this planet, you start to realize that reality isn't nor has it ever been black and white...it is more grey than anything.


There are selfish, and selfless people in every race, every religion, every country, coming from every socioeconomic background. There are people who are homeless, who are absurdly selfish and do all kinds of vile things. There are people who are in the 1% of the 1% of the controlling wealth on this planet.....who spend the majority of their time HELPING countries, helping people, etc.

I know this point is long and sort of off topic......but it isn't entirely off topic. My point is this:

So many conspiracy theorists think they have it all figured out. Take for instance the guys calling and harassing this Gene Rosen figure. Do you guys think for one second that ANYONE harassing this man really has ANY idea who he is? NONE of us do.


There is a difference between people who are on a quest for knowledge.....people who just LOVE learning and growing and figuring things out......and then people who are out TO PROVE A POINT.

The conspiracy theory community gets many of BOTH of those personalities. Some, like me, are just passing by on our eternal quest and thirst for knowledge. We just love to learn.

others, for some reason or another, are out to prove the world wrong....to expose this or that....filled with anger and hate at the world, and those they think who run things. THESE are the people who aren't here to LEARN.....instead, they are here for their OWN agenda. I hope you all recognize this.

When did I ever stereotype everyone here at GLP? Wouldn't that also include myself? I simply stated that I wouldn't surprised if at least SOME of the ones harassing Gene Rosen aren't members here at GLP. That shouldn't surprise you OR me if we later find this out.


Also, you say you are just asking questions. Then why are you replying to my post, and quoting it? Didn't I specifically say that asking questions is a GOOD thing, and didn't I even SAY to post about it, make videos about it, blog about it, etc? Did you even read my post?

Gangstalking has to do with harassment. If people are bombarding this man with e-mails and phone calls filled with insults, accusations, threats, etc......THAT is harassment, and illegal. That is FAR different than posting on GLP asking a few questions about the Sandy Hook incident.

you should stamp your little feet

i have i have i have

I do not believe what hes saying, and as stated earlier, from the class photo, ms soto should not have 6 extra students available for Gene, as too many died and were found at the school, but nor do i think its fair harrasing him with no proof of this. He might just be a horrible actor who want some attention, and death threats do not make us and out views look good at all, "they" will win if we follow that path, as more and more "random" people who hear about us, will think were all crazy potential mass murderers. Why would they think that? They will think that when the MSM start feeding them the storys of how bad we are, how crazy our theories are, and how we harras innocent people because of our views.
We need to act sophisticated, and try and make sence, not rant on like lunatics.
They have already started using MSM to demonize us for our theories, with Cooper, and now i wouldnt be suprised if this hit the MSM aswell, and lets use our brains here, really, it just doesnt put us in a good light, the only positive we get from it is that our theories somewhat actually hit the MSM, but im pretty sure it wont be worth it if they label us like crazy people who threat people.

It's simple really. His stories don't match. His first interviews were bad acting. He is an actor.

Like the medical examiner said, he hopes it all doesn't come down on the heads of the people from Newtown.

Well, it's all coming down on their heads.

Who was the guy Rosen refers to at the 1:00 point of this video. "Talking harshly" as the kids sat in "orderly fashion."

they have not been demonized in my eyes through the MSM

they have been demonized in my eyes by being unremorseful, maniacal nut-sacks and by doing it right in front of me. i don't watch MSM, but i see it happening every day.

hAve any of you rang or emailed mr rosen?
i for one have not
we should have a poll set up on here at glp
asking if anyone has or has not harrassed mr Rosen
so they can LOOK ELSEWHERE FOR THE CULPRITS

Meanwhile
Thread: NEWTONBEE reports MAN hunted down IN WOODS off duty out of Town tactical swat

I never personally called or e-mailed Rosen, but if I did, that doesn't constitute harrassment.

I wonder what kind of people the government will go after when they decide to do something about the "Mentally Ill" in this country that might be a danger to other people???

the content of the contact would decide whether or not it constitutes harrassment.

Probably anyone who doesn't fall in line. They'll play the mentally ill card against dissidents. It's been done before.

You're right, Mordier, it would.

For instance, if I called and asked him what happened to the guy "talking harshly" to the children at the end of his driveway, that wouldn't constitute harrassment.

If I asked him if the children had blood on them, that would not constitute harrassment.

If i asked him why he brought up the possiblity of a hunter in the area when the idea is totally ludicrous, that would not constitute harrassment.

If I asked him why he didn't immediately call the police, that wouldn't constitute harrassment.

Last Edited by Gladio on 01/15/2013 06:50 PM

Those are all good questions, by the way.

You actually don't understand what it is I was trying to tell you do you?

i did, and i crushed you under them. lol

Some type of vague threat? I really don't know.

I know you are not referring to me personally because I am of perfectly sound mind and I have plenty of character references as well as a medical history that affirm this.