You're making that figure up.


Gardasil was released in the June of 2006. Call it 78 months ago for ease of calculations.
So if there were "over 100 deaths per month from Gardasil that would mean that there have been over 78,000 deaths from it?
Is that correct?
Well it has to be as that's what you're saying.

Up until November 2012 there has been 24,000 adverse effects reported to VAERS.
Just so you understand what a reported adverse effect is; anything in the Reportable Events Table which happens to a patient within a certain time-period after a vaccination can be reported as an adverse effect. It doesn't mean that the vaccination actually caused it, just that it has been reported.
These can range from a mild headache to anaphylaxis. Naturally a death would also be reported.

Do you understand that?

Now lets look at the numbers again.
You say you got this figure of "over 100 per month" from VAERS. Really?
Just to reiterate, there have been 24,000 reported events (that figure is easily researchable in VAERS. It's even referenced on anti-vax sites) yet you say there has been over 78,000 DEATHS (which generally only form a minute percebtage of reported events). Now if we assume that your wildly incorrect figures are somehow not incorrect, if we were to add all of the other events in proportion we would probably be looking at over 1 million reported events.

That's not the correct figure is it?
You've made this all up yourself I think.

Either that or you really do need to do your research better.

(As a footnote VAERS is an incredibly poor source to try to combine vaccines with effects. As I mentioned above, events can be reported whether they're caused by the vaccine or not. Using VAERS for research like that is essentially dumpster diving. You never know what you're going to one day to the other).