|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Moral Authority And The Dilemma Of The Christian American Warrior
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
No, moron. The thing is you are saying people can't go against the Constitution as it is today. But the fact that it ALLOWS change and allows amendments (which can later be removed) shows that discussion of change is not against the Constitution. You are trying to stop the process the Constitution allows, and that is where it is against the Constitution itself. It wants people to change things if the need comes, and not feel locked in. To say political speech is to be stopped if it goes against the current form of the Constitution is to go against that very Constitution which guarantees free political speech (and disagreement with the Constitution). You want to stop that. And that is where you fail to understand anything.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3050697 What need is there to change the Second Amendment? Do you believe that restricting or eliminating it all together will reduce violence? It is clear to me you have never served in a military unit, because you do not rush into the teeth of your enemy's defense, you find their gaps. Violent people will still find a way to kill, and destroying the Second Amendment simply makes it easier for them to do so - because they know law abiding citizens will follows the rules, while they clearly will not, as evidenced by their desire to murder. Again, moron, you are going with "I agree with it, so don't change it and if you try to change it, I find you an enemy." The Constitution doesn't. That is where you fail you moron. Whether or not there is a "need" is not the question of the Constitution itself. Fucking moron, you fucking fail. Your childish antics are comical at best. What you fail to realize is that America will only survive as long as there are those willing to defend it. If we lose the principles of liberty and freedom, then we have already lost our country, AND our constitution. Your intentions are becoming clearer by the moment... Childish? You are the one who is going against the Constitution in the name of the Constitution, which is what happens with a lot of morons. You are the one who thinks the rights currently in play can be stopped (freedom to criticize the Constitution, for example). You think we must limit ourselves to how it is now without ability to question and change it. I am not saying it should or should not be changed - I am pointing out your position runs against the Constitution and the right to criticize it and the right to try to change it. Would you have been willing to attack those who wanted to allow alcohol to return to common use when the Constitution didn't allow it? Tell them they are unAmerican? The only child is you who holds on to a childish view: don't look to change things or else. Sorry fucktard, you fail.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
