3 Spheres, 6 Sides, 9 Points

hey ss,,

just promise you will never stop sharing,,

much love,,

I will do my best, Nobody

Nesting Vortices... that is just stupid cool. Brilliant! I will need to watch that video about a hundred more times. Printed the simple explanation as well. Thank you so much for posting it!

Hopefully it is a little easier to visualize now.

changed mind

Last Edited by WindyMind on 01/22/2013 02:55 PM

It is a theory on how mass manifests into the universe. What everything is 'made' of.

OP , so are you essentially saying that If the universe is essentially created from one universal substance, the aether, it must be form that is used to create different and separate things out of this universal substance. The torus is nature’s perfect flow form to create a seemingly separate entity in the formless aether that is stable enough to last.

DId that make any sense at all?

Yep.

But, this is where it becomes extremely difficult to put into language...

...the aether is dormant electricity and magnetism. CERN may have found that this dormant electricity and magnetism are actually two separate fields of 'charge'. Without movement, they don't exist in the material. But, when movement comes across the aether, it forms the torus as I have said.

When electricity (charge) and magnetism (field) are not in motion, they are two separate 'fields' or charges. They are the two causes that manifest the universe. When they are in motion, they create a singular effect: the torus. Remember, we are talking small...just above the quantum level.

We can think of it another way. There are two 'realities'. One is the non-material, and the other material. The material manifests out of the non-material. The non-material begins manifesting into the material, but there is a type of...a layer of singularity that is completely un-viewable and un-knowable. The Buddhist call this Indra's Net. It is within everything, yet can never be witnessed.


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The non-material, when manifesting into the material, must pass through Indra's Net. Indra's Net holds the blueprint of how electricity and magnetism should behave when in motion.

Ok, here's another small glimpse. The sphere encompasses the three cubic constructs whilst residing at the very heart (arbitrary center), pierced by the eight converving lines we call the polar pyramidal structures.

As the sphere(appears) to flow from center and ebb back to center; the pyramidal structures move from balance upon the each the others tip from x to octahedron. This occurs concurrently with the flow of sphere.

As the pyramidal structures are spinning they create polar vortices which deforms the spheres to torroids. As they reverbrate with an in and out flux.


What I previously describe as the verbum.


How many swords through the sacred heart?

From x to diamond would be a better visualization.

And back we are to the poincare conjecture with the nature of form between the sphere and torroid to encompass a point in space.

3

Do you remember the conversation on times function adhering to the form and the nature of the circle to obscure?

and you postulate that the electric and magnetic aether fields are both eternal...that they have literally ALWAYS existed?

How can that be?

Doesn't everything have to have a beginning?

Or are you saying that these two "fields" are part and parcel with "God"? THey make up "God's" essence?

or are you atheist?

Also remember the nature of the motions of the 3 forms work synergistically to imbue alternative functions to form.

I've been waiting for you to contribute.

The part in bold came to me today. It happened when I was remembering my vision of the charge sequence.

:chargesequence:

The vision I had made it seem that the flow towards through and outward from center was not just that one spin constantly. Like you said, it ebbs and flows (heartbeat, breath, cycles, etc.). Since the sphere is doing this, so too are the pyramidal structures.

7 swords? It would make sense if it were 8.

Not an atheist.

No. Nothing has a 'beginning'. Only changes. Some will associate these two fields just as you did. As if they are 'God's essence' or God itself, and probably immediately turn away from the concepts.

They are a portion of Source, God, whatever anyone wants to call it. Yes, it is very different from the biblical type God.

Perfection can only exist within limitless potential as by definition if it had a finite delimiter it would gain all the properties of limitation and would itself have to reside within a larger form.

Sorry Dion. Trying to finish up work.

Nice!



Perfection is dynamic.

If it has 5, it would make sense, but now I have to look. :)

love it:)

saw this 5 days ago, twas awesome ;)

[link to fbstatic-a.akamaihd.net (secure)]

5?

Then I am missing something, or have misinterpreted something.

“Two psyches, two signals. Set and ground which the twin psyches blend together: one sees set, the other sees ground. so it is essential that they do remain “di” or twain: if they merged into one psyche they would no longer percieve/recieve two differing signals, no longer be able to do a set-ground feature extraction. Twin push-pull psyches working in tandem. more than set-ground: two worlds (spatiotemporal?) based on a common essence; and the common essence can be percieved as archetypal constants (common to both signals or worlds); what i call “archetypes” or “eide” are those elements common to both signals, percieved by both psyches: what overlaps, is present in both (worlds) and to both psyches.”-Philip K. Dick

8 lines, 5 points in a pyramid. Is that where you are getting the 5 from?

Holy crap. Thank you for this quote. That is amazing.

Mr. Dick, I believe, could see.

I think there is 7.

Perhaps '8' is them together as a full entity. As we were talking about earlier, with the full spectrum.

There is 7 swords associated with the Sacred Heart. That's what I thought too.

I was talking about the sacred heart. It popped into mind while I was writing the above; And you know how I feel about free association to loose a deluge.

It is shown as being pierced by 3 and 7.

Remember I'm trying to expose a root commonto all trees.

Truly a fools journey.

But, in my circumstances, it works quite well.

Somewhere betweenSancho and Quixote.

:tetraktys :

Here's our seven within the models.

What I don't understand about them symbolizing it this way, is that they are basing the 7 and 10 off of 2 dimensions. If we look at it 3 dimensionally, there are 16 points, not 10.

With the inner supposedly containing 7, but actually having 13.