You bring up some really interesting questions, Michael. Quoting: Silentlyknowing 27028191
Thank you for posting. As far as this thread goes, since
Danny Wilten (it is his work we are discussing and not
Spinoza, right?) has NOT tied down a specific meaning yet
for all of this, you can believe what you choose to believe!
(Or that there is no substance whatsoever to the suggestion in the first place.)
But the only problem I have with that is that when you suggest that you have found something that is the "Vatican's biggest SECRET", that implies that you have something very specific
in mind. You can explain what that secret is, as compared to other possible secrets; you can explain why
the Vatican needs that to be kept secret and what they have done to keep it a secret. And you can explain the consequences if that secret were to be made public.
And I don't see much, if any
, of those things in this thread.
In other words, that would be like Einstein saying "I am going to develop one of the most revolutionary physical theories EVER
" in 1899; but, when questioned, he has nothing specific to report.