## How To Solve This Equation? 3/1(1+2) = x | |

HJTRASUser ID: 26396568 United States 01/21/2013 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

kpduties User ID: 28786195 United States 01/21/2013 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

DUCM900 (OP)User ID: 32755121 Italy 01/21/2013 08:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ahh, now it makes sense... You took a comedy class instead of math. That didn't pan out so well. CalmShock you notice most shit talkers are Anonymous CowardsHJTRAS What difference does it make? . Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 01/21/2013 08:43 PM |

CalmShockUser ID: 5056346 Canada 01/21/2013 08:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ahh, now it makes sense... You took a comedy class instead of math. That didn't pan out so well. CalmShock you notice most shit talkers are Anonymous Cowards HJTRAS What difference does it make? . DUCM900 They're smart enough to know better. You failed. Patience is a virtue I just can't wait to achieve - CalmShock |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 22423564 United States 01/21/2013 08:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dear god, people. There are two expressions (3/1) and (1+2) and since there is no operator between the two, standard convention is to solve the expressions and multiply. 3/1 = 3 1+2 = 3 (3)(3) = 9 Think of it like this: a(b) = x Where a is equal to 3/1 and b is equal to 1+ 2. |

CalmShockUser ID: 5056346 Canada 01/21/2013 08:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are confused about parentheses usage. You're answer of nine comes from seeing the equation as this 3/1x(1+2). Quoting: The answer is 1 because you solve the parenthesis as a whole. 1(1+2) is solved first before doing the rest of the multiplication and division. kpduties 28786195 (idiot)s Patience is a virtue I just can't wait to achieve - CalmShock |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 18119934 Canada 01/21/2013 08:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

kpduties User ID: 28786195 United States 01/21/2013 08:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32768715 United States 01/21/2013 08:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Jesus, Lucifer & Muhammad: numeric totals of their names are the sameBest Viewed on you tube because of the annotations Jesus Christ, Lucifer & Muhammad the mathematical mystery. Using one numeric alphabet the name Jesus, Lucifer and Muhammad have a same exact numeric total for the addition of their letters of their names. So what does that mean, watch the video to learn more. |

kpduties User ID: 28786195 United States 01/21/2013 08:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

HJTRASUser ID: 26396568 United States 01/21/2013 08:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are confused about parentheses usage. You're answer of nine comes from seeing the equation as this 3/1x(1+2). Quoting: The answer is 1 because you solve the parenthesis as a whole. 1(1+2) is solved first before doing the rest of the multiplication and division. kpduties 28786195 (idiot)s CalmShock OMFG they are still arguing 1. lets give them a real equation n2-3n+4/2 LMAO Oh wait I bet the answer is 1 all answers are 1 in GLP world Last Edited by HJTRAS on 01/21/2013 08:59 PM RAS |

CalmShockUser ID: 5056346 Canada 01/21/2013 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

CalmShockUser ID: 5056346 Canada 01/21/2013 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32726085 Germany 01/21/2013 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | besides of the colors, which tell us how the equation should be read, it is all a matter of interpretation actually... thats why the fights over this equation, or better, the two equations... because as someone posted before, this is simply a poorly written equation... maybe becauseof things like this, we have uncertaincies in universe, maybe someone forgot some brackets... :D so the problem is, what we recognize as a term... it seems like half of people see it like this: 3/1*(1+2) other half like this: 3/(1*(1+2)) same with calculators, its all about interpretation of brackets... it should be even in the manual, how brackets are interpreted, because manufacturers know about these problems... mathematically both are kind of correct... 3/1*(1+2)=9 is correct however, brackets can also be solved like this: 3/(1*1+1*2)=1 which is correct too no? :P |

NyarlathotepUser ID: 20053617 United States 01/21/2013 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | :| wtf is wrong with you people? x = 9... simple as that. Let me break this down into baby steps for you because I have to apparently hold your hand. Anyone that wants to reference this reply, go ahead. Remember PEDMAS as the order of operations. What that means is what we need to work out first... 1. Parentheses (what is inside them) 2. Exponents 3. Division OR Multiplication (which ever comes first left to right) 4. Addition OR Subtraction (Which ever comes first left to right) Our problem is: 3/1(1+2) = x Step 1. First we need to work out the problem in parenthesis. we keep the parentheses around 3 to represent the multiplicative relationship between 3 and 1. 3/1( 1+2) = x --> 3/1(3) = x (or it could have been 3/1 x 3 = X)Step 2. Move onto #2 in the order of operations. 3/1(3) = x --> 3(3) = x Step 3. Now all we have left is a simple multiplication between the two 3's. This could have read as 3 x 3 = X. 3(3) = x --> 9 = X OR X = 9 The answer is 9. Even this calculator here, a scientific calculator, states that is the correct answer: [link to web2.0calc.com] and put in 3/1(1+2) = x. Anyone else who refutes this has some education to catch up on. Where do I think the problem lies in peoples responses? It lies in the fact that people are mixing up Parenthetic importance around the three with a multiplicative relationship between the 3 and the 1. The parentheses only stay because they provide that multiplicative relationship. We could have also written it as 3/1 x 3 = X where the little x is the symbol for multiplication. We don't need to have that extra sign though when we have an existing parentheses around the 3 as it doubles as a multiplicative relationship for the 1.Last Edited by Nyarlathotep on 01/21/2013 09:16 PM |

DUCM900 (OP)User ID: 32755121 Italy 01/21/2013 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 30842846 United States 01/21/2013 09:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

NyarlathotepUser ID: 20053617 United States 01/21/2013 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | besides of the colors, which tell us how the equation should be read, it is all a matter of interpretation actually... thats why the fights over this equation, or better, the two equations... because as someone posted before, this is simply a poorly written equation... maybe becauseof things like this, we have uncertaincies in universe, maybe someone forgot some brackets... :D Quoting: so the problem is, what we recognize as a term... it seems like half of people see it like this: 3/1*(1+2) other half like this: 3/(1*(1+2)) same with calculators, its all about interpretation of brackets... it should be even in the manual, how brackets are interpreted, because manufacturers know about these problems... mathematically both are kind of correct... 3/1*(1+2)=9 is correct however, brackets can also be solved like this: 3/(1*1+1*2)=1 which is correct too no? :P Anonymous Coward 32726085 First off, they are parentheses. Secondly, Math is very clear and precise on how it handles the breakdown of equations. Their is no "interpretation" of a math problem unless it has no clear answer (x = y). The problem lies in the fact that people are leaving the parentheses around the 3 and attempting to give it primary order of operation status. This is false. The only reason we keep the parentheses around the 3 is because we have a multiplicative relationship with the 1 next to it. We could have also written it as: 3/1 x 3 = X. We keep the parentheses because it provides that multiplicative (multiplication) relationship between the two without needing an additional sign. |

HJTRASUser ID: 26396568 United States 01/21/2013 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | :| wtf is wrong with you people? Quoting: x = 9... simple as that. Let me break this down into baby steps for you because I have to apparently hold your hand. Anyone that wants to reference this reply, go ahead. Remember PEDMAS as the order of operations. What that means is what we need to work out first... 1. Parentheses (what is inside them) 2. Exponents 3. Division OR Multiplication (which ever comes first left to right) 4. Addition OR Subtraction (Which ever comes first left to right) Our problem is: 3/1(1+2) = x Step 1. First we need to work out the problem in parenthesis. we keep the parentheses around 3 to represent the multiplicative relationship between 3 and 1. 3/1( 1+2) = x --> 3/1(3) = x (or it could have been 3/1 x 3 = X)Step 2. Move onto #2 in the order of operations. 3/1(3) = x --> 3(3) = x Step 3. Now all we have left is a simple multiplication between the two 3's. This could have read as 3 x 3 = X. 3(3) = x --> 9 = X OR X = 9 The answer is 9. Even this calculator here, a scientific calculator, states that is the correct answer: [link to web2.0calc.com] and put in 3/1(1+2) = x.ucking easy. Anyone else who refutes this has some education to catch up on. Nyarlathotep why does anyone after a thought of 15 seconds think 1. damn 9 is the answer so fucking easy RAS |

CalmShockUser ID: 5056346 Canada 01/21/2013 09:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Smartest thing you've said all day. Patience is a virtue I just can't wait to achieve - CalmShock |

NyarlathotepUser ID: 20053617 United States 01/21/2013 09:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | :| wtf is wrong with you people? Quoting: x = 9... simple as that. Let me break this down into baby steps for you because I have to apparently hold your hand. Anyone that wants to reference this reply, go ahead. Remember PEDMAS as the order of operations. What that means is what we need to work out first... 1. Parentheses (what is inside them) 2. Exponents 3. Division OR Multiplication (which ever comes first left to right) 4. Addition OR Subtraction (Which ever comes first left to right) Our problem is: 3/1(1+2) = x Step 1. First we need to work out the problem in parenthesis. we keep the parentheses around 3 to represent the multiplicative relationship between 3 and 1. 3/1( 1+2) = x --> 3/1(3) = x (or it could have been 3/1 x 3 = X)Step 2. Move onto #2 in the order of operations. 3/1(3) = x --> 3(3) = x Step 3. Now all we have left is a simple multiplication between the two 3's. This could have read as 3 x 3 = X. 3(3) = x --> 9 = X OR X = 9 The answer is 9. Even this calculator here, a scientific calculator, states that is the correct answer: [link to web2.0calc.com] and put in 3/1(1+2) = x.ucking easy. Anyone else who refutes this has some education to catch up on. Nyarlathotep why does anyone after a thought of 15 seconds think 1. damn 9 is the answer so fucking easy HJTRAS Because no one wants to admit their wrong or they are just THAT stupid. |

DUCM900 (OP)User ID: 32755121 Italy 01/21/2013 09:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we follow some basic logic its 1 for sure.BTW as I told before, do the job well and you can verify yourself if you have one, the other ones scientific calculatorsnot.However there must be a mess in a certain models some years ago, probably they messed up with some chips with other ones in some models: look for example at this >>>>> [link to s20.postimage.org] . Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 01/21/2013 09:31 PM |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32726085 Germany 01/21/2013 09:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

CalmShockUser ID: 5056346 Canada 01/21/2013 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we follow some basic logic its 1 for sure.BTW as I told before, scientific calculators do the job well and you can verify yourself if you have one, the other ones not.However there must be a mess in a certain models some years ago, probably they messed up with some chips with other ones in some models: look at this >>>>> [link to s20.postimage.org] . DUCM900 ok... now look at the model of each of the texas instruments posted. TI-85 and TI-86 TI-86 is the newer model see the answer? You just proved yourself wrong. Thanks for sharing. Patience is a virtue I just can't wait to achieve - CalmShock |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 12786780 Canada 01/21/2013 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's a fraction times a whole number 3/1 * (1+2) = X 3/1is how we do fraction with a keyboard. 3/1(3)=x you put a 1 under the whole number to make it a fraction ex.3/1 * 3 to multiply you would turn your 3 into a fraction as so 3/1* 3/1 = x then you would multiply the two fractions 3/1 * 3/1 = (3 x 3 = 9 and 1 x 1=1) = 9/1 X= 9/1 So all you 9's and ones were 50% right. You all looked at it like a divide when in fact 3/1 is a fraction. |

DUCM900 (OP)User ID: 32755121 Italy 01/21/2013 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

CalmShockUser ID: 5056346 Canada 01/21/2013 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As you can see folks, I'm genuine, I did not lie on the operation with casio stuff on previous page. BTW some child (or dumb sheep)here, are still playing Quoting: 'I'm going to take my ball and go home!' if its not 9.Period DUCM900 So you admit that the newer scientific calculator which you linked a picture to is right? and by that I mean you were wrong? Patience is a virtue I just can't wait to achieve - CalmShock |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 12786780 Canada 01/21/2013 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

CalmShockUser ID: 5056346 Canada 01/21/2013 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's a fraction times a whole number Quoting: 3/1 * (1+2) = X 3/1is how we do fraction with a keyboard. 3/1(3)=x you put a 1 under the whole number to make it a fraction ex.3/1 * 3 to multiply you would turn your 3 into a fraction as so 3/1* 3/1 = x then you would multiply the two fractions 3/1 * 3/1 = (3 x 3 = 9 and 1 x 1=1) = 9/1 X= 9/1 So all you 9's and ones were 50% right. You all looked at it like a divide when in fact 3/1 is a fraction. Anonymous Coward 12786780 PACIFIST!!!! Patience is a virtue I just can't wait to achieve - CalmShock |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 12786780 Canada 01/21/2013 09:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As you can see folks, I'm genuine, I did not lie on the operation with casio stuff on previous page. BTW some child (or dumb sheep)here, are still playing Quoting: 'I'm going to take my ball and go home!' if its not 9.Period DUCM900 OP the next time you try to put a equation online make sure you now what 3/1 really means, it's not 3 divide by1 the / makes the 3/1 a fraction making the entire equation a FRACTION TIMES A WHOLE NUMBER WHICH MEAN X= 9/1 A FRACTION |

Related Threads

- Marty McFly's " hoverboard" and a future beyond wheels
- Feds Continue Orwellian Surveillance of Social Media
- Top Scientist: This Version Of Ebola Looks Like ‘A Very Different Bug’
- 153 people being monitored for Ebola in Ohio
- World's First Biometric Credit Card Will Arrive in 2015: Pay with Your Fingerprint
- Muslim Throws Brick At German Shepherd, What Happens Next
- 124-year-old “Grave” Warning About Democrats
- Man Wakes Up From Colonoscopy Wearing Pink Panties
- Classic Example of Origin of HIV and Gates Foundation Hypocrisy and Conflicting Interests
- Obama to Allow 100,000 Haitians into America Without a Visa
- Johns Hopkins Scientist Reveals Shocking Report on Flu Vaccines
- Facebook, Apple now paying for female employees to freeze their eggs cryonically
- If A Few Ebola Cases Can Make The Stock Market Crash This Much, What Would A Full-Blown Pandemic Mean?
- FEMA Conducting Pandemic Drills Amidst Ebola Crisis
- Propaganda 101 – How the Pentagon is Trying to Rewrite Vietnam War History
- What you need to know about EZ-Pass & privacy
- Parents May Be Liable for What Their Kids Post on Facebook, Court Rules
- How Ebola Aerosolized in Pigs Could Kill Millions
- The Rise of All-Purpose Antidepressants: Doctors are increasingly prescribing SSRIs to treat more than just depression
- Why Nations (and organizations) Fail: Self-Serving Elites
- Bad news: Facepaint is racist and is now banned at Arizona State University
- FBI Director: Government Surveillance 'Enhances Liberty'
- It's Starting: Russians and Chinese Are Ditching the Dollar and Europeans Are Using Renminbi in Their Reserves
- Emergency Healthcare Worker Tells Man To Call Back When He’s Unconscious
- Travel Ban Issued for Ebola Control, But NOT for Liberians