## How To Solve This Equation? 3/1(1+2) = x | |

DUCM900 (OP)User ID: 32755121 Italy 01/21/2013 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | X= 9/1 Quoting: Fraction times a whole number WTF!!!!!! I got it right IT's 9/1 GLP is full of retards. A couple posts up and you can see the equation and how it's solved. Anonymous Coward 12786780 Just buy a latest model of a scientific calculator and you'll see that its 1. You know canadian boy, Its not too difficult to do it.. |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 12786780 Canada 01/21/2013 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32726085 Germany 01/21/2013 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As you can see folks, I'm genuine, I did not lie on the operation with casio stuff on previous page. BTW some child (or dumb sheep)here, are still playing Quoting: 'I'm going to take my ball and go home!' if its not 9.Period DUCM900 OP the next time you try to put a equation online make sure you now what 3/1 really means, it's not 3 divide by1 the / makes the 3/1 a fraction making the entire equation a FRACTION TIMES A WHOLE NUMBER WHICH MEAN X= 9/1 A FRACTIONAnonymous Coward 12786780 but not if 3 is red and 1 is green... this whole discussion is like fighting if turqoise is blue or green... it all about interpretation of brackets... |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 18119934 Canada 01/21/2013 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

CalmShockUser ID: 5056346 Canada 01/21/2013 10:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As you can see folks, I'm genuine, I did not lie on the operation with casio stuff on previous page. BTW some child (or dumb sheep)here, are still playing Quoting: 'I'm going to take my ball and go home!' if its not 9.Period DUCM900 OP the next time you try to put a equation online make sure you now what 3/1 really means, it's not 3 divide by1 the / makes the 3/1 a fraction making the entire equation a FRACTION TIMES A WHOLE NUMBER WHICH MEAN X= 9/1 A FRACTIONAnonymous Coward 12786780 A combined total of nearly 150 pages on two threads and you're the only one with that answer... You're a real trendsetter! Last Edited by CalmShock on 01/21/2013 10:05 PM Patience is a virtue I just can't wait to achieve - CalmShock |

NyarlathotepUser ID: 20053617 United States 01/21/2013 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ah I get it now, there are two ways to see it and it is very easy to confuse them together. Quoting: 3/(1*(1+2))=x x is 1 or (3/1)*(1+2)=x x is 9 According to BEDMAS rules the answer is 9. Done in this order: Brackets Exponents Division Addition Subtraction Anonymous Coward 18119934 wtf? NO. It is only 9. Why are you lumping the 1 in with the other parentheses? It isn't there to begin with... Why is this so hard for you all to get? It's basic math! 3/1 TIMES (1+2) 3/1 TIMES 3 3 TIMES 3 9 SUPER SIMPLE. |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 18119934 Canada 01/21/2013 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

NyarlathotepUser ID: 20053617 United States 01/21/2013 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How are Fractions and Division Related? Okay, here’s where things get interesting. Have you ever noticed that the way we write fractions is the same as the way we usually write division problems? In other words: two numbers separated by a horizontal or slashed line? Well, this notational similarity isn’t an accident. Let’s go back to our example fraction 22/7, and think about it in terms of a division problem instead: 22 divided by 7. How can we interpret this problem? Well, imagine you have a single 22 meter long stick that you need to divide into 7 equally sized pieces. How long will each of those pieces be? That question is exactly what the division problem is asking too. So, imagine you go about making marks on your big 22 meter stick and successfully divide it up into 7 pieces. And then imagine using your meter sticks and your 1/7 meter sticks from before to figure out how long one of these divided pieces is. The answer will be 22/7 or 3 1/7—the exact same as before. source: [link to mathdude.quickanddirtytips.com] Last Edited by Nyarlathotep on 01/21/2013 10:07 PM |

NyarlathotepUser ID: 20053617 United States 01/21/2013 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 12786780 Canada 01/21/2013 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32726085 Germany 01/21/2013 10:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

NyarlathotepUser ID: 20053617 United States 01/21/2013 10:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | :| wtf is wrong with you people? Quoting: x = 9... simple as that. Let me break this down into baby steps for you because I have to apparently hold your hand. Anyone that wants to reference this reply, go ahead. Remember PEDMAS as the order of operations. What that means is what we need to work out first... 1. Parentheses (what is inside them) 2. Exponents 3. Division OR Multiplication (which ever comes first left to right) 4. Addition OR Subtraction (Which ever comes first left to right) Our problem is: 3/1(1+2) = x Step 1. First we need to work out the problem in parenthesis. we keep the parentheses around 3 to represent the multiplicative relationship between 3 and 1. 3/1( 1+2) = x --> 3/1(3) = x (or it could have been 3/1 x 3 = X)Step 2. Move onto #2 in the order of operations. 3/1(3) = x --> 3(3) = x Step 3. Now all we have left is a simple multiplication between the two 3's. This could have read as 3 x 3 = X. 3(3) = x --> 9 = X OR X = 9 The answer is 9. Even this calculator here, a scientific calculator, states that is the correct answer: [link to web2.0calc.com] and put in 3/1(1+2) = x. Anyone else who refutes this has some education to catch up on. Where do I think the problem lies in peoples responses? It lies in the fact that people are mixing up Parenthetic importance around the three with a multiplicative relationship between the 3 and the 1. The parentheses only stay because they provide that multiplicative relationship. We could have also written it as 3/1 x 3 = X where the little x is the symbol for multiplication. We don't need to have that extra sign though when we have an existing parentheses around the 3 as it doubles as a multiplicative relationship for the 1.Nyarlathotep for education Last Edited by Nyarlathotep on 01/21/2013 10:21 PM |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32726085 Germany 01/21/2013 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

DUCM900 (OP)User ID: 32755121 Italy 01/21/2013 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | instead of repeating same things over and over again, tell me, if you are such a genius, what is wrong in my calculation? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32726085 check that one as well >>>> Thread: How To Solve That Equation? 6/((2)¹+(2)²) = x . |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 24904482 Canada 01/21/2013 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

MHzUser ID: 32332417 Canada 01/21/2013 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | what sign does the equation use for 'divide'? 3 over 1 times (1+2) 3 over (1 times 3) 3 over 3 equals 1 3 divided by 1 times (1+2) 3 divided by (1 times 3) 3 divided by 3 equals 1 btw whole numbers are not expressed as 3 over 1, they are put as 3, a (fraction) is 1/3 or 1 divided by 3. Your question could have been. 3/1((1(1+2))) Last Edited by MHz on 01/21/2013 10:39 PM |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 25764830 Canada 01/21/2013 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The answer is that its a poorly written equation and the answer depends upon your interpretation. Quoting: I would say the answer is 1, because I see the equation as 3 ----- 1(1+2) Those who say the answer is 9 are interpreting it as: 3 --(1+2) 1 Anonymous Coward 21687950 This guy gets it Anonymous Coward 24904482 he gets their misinterpretation. there is only one RIGHT way to interpret this and every calculator in the world will agree. |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 12786780 Canada 01/21/2013 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes if the OP knew how to right an equation on a keyboard. 3/1 is a fraction not a divide so he messed up big time. 3/1(1+2) in this form is a fraction times a whole number. This what the equation should look like OP 3÷1(1+2)= X NOT 3/1(1+2) WHICH IS ONCE AGAIN A FRACTION TIMES A WHOLE NUMBER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32726085 Germany 01/21/2013 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The answer is that its a poorly written equation and the answer depends upon your interpretation. Quoting: I would say the answer is 1, because I see the equation as 3 ----- 1(1+2) Those who say the answer is 9 are interpreting it as: 3 --(1+2) 1 Anonymous Coward 21687950 This guy gets it Anonymous Coward 24904482 exactly, and this was written numerous times now, but people still want to fight about 1or 9 ... and all of them think, they are such geniuses, but only show their narrow mind as they cannot understand both points of view... |

NyarlathotepUser ID: 20053617 United States 01/21/2013 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes if the OP knew how to right an equation on a keyboard. Quoting: 3/1 is a fraction not a divide so he messed up big time. 3/1(1+2) in this form is a fraction times a whole number. This what the equation should look like OP 3÷1(1+2)= X NOT 3/1(1+2) WHICH IS ONCE AGAIN A FRACTION TIMES A WHOLE NUMBER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anonymous Coward 12786780 [link to www.matthewcompher.com] |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32776229 United States 01/21/2013 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32726085 Germany 01/21/2013 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The answer is that its a poorly written equation and the answer depends upon your interpretation. Quoting: I would say the answer is 1, because I see the equation as 3 ----- 1(1+2) Those who say the answer is 9 are interpreting it as: 3 --(1+2) 1 Anonymous Coward 21687950 This guy gets it Anonymous Coward 24904482 he gets their misinterpretation. there is only one RIGHT way to interpret this and every calculator in the world will agree. Anonymous Coward 25764830 you are wrong there... brackets can be interpreted differently... if you compare calculators, you will see, every calculator has a manual, where is written, how ths specific calculator handles brackets... you are also wrong, if you think, every equation has only one correct result... it depends on how exact the equation is defined, this one leves space for interpretation, so allowing 1and 9 as correct answers... |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 25764830 Canada 01/21/2013 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I would say the answer is 1, because I see the equation as 3 ----- 1(1+2) Those who say the answer is 9 are interpreting it as: 3 --(1+2) 1 Anonymous Coward 21687950 This guy gets it Anonymous Coward 24904482 exactly, and this was written numerous times now, but people still want to fight about 1or 9 ... and all of them think, they are such geniuses, but only show their narrow mind as they cannot understand both points of view... Anonymous Coward 32726085 math is fixed and definite. it isn't someone political or religious views, there are no different points of views. it's either right or wrong. and, i'm 100% certain people don't consider themselves geniuses for doing grade 5 math, they are just laughing at you for not being able to do it. |

MHzUser ID: 32332417 Canada 01/21/2013 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 3 friends rent a room for the night and the clerk charges them $30 or $10 each. The manager comes back and says they were charged too much so he gives the clerk $5 to give back to the men. The clerk gives each man back $1 and he keeps $2. The 3 men each paid $9 for the room which is $27 and the $2 the clerk has is $29. where is the other dollar? |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32726085 Germany 01/21/2013 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I would say the answer is 1, because I see the equation as 3 ----- 1(1+2) Those who say the answer is 9 are interpreting it as: 3 --(1+2) 1 Anonymous Coward 21687950 This guy gets it Anonymous Coward 24904482 exactly, and this was written numerous times now, but people still want to fight about 1or 9 ... and all of them think, they are such geniuses, but only show their narrow mind as they cannot understand both points of view... Anonymous Coward 32726085 math is fixed and definite. it isn't someone political or religious views, there are no different points of views. it's either right or wrong. and, i'm 100% certain people don't consider themselves geniuses for doing grade 5 math, they are just laughing at you for not being able to do it. Anonymous Coward 25764830 read my post above this, laugh if you want, still you are wrong |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 25764830 Canada 01/21/2013 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | exactly, and this was written numerous times now, but people still want to fight about 1or 9 ... and all of them think, they are such geniuses, but only show their narrow mind as they cannot understand both points of view... Anonymous Coward 32726085 math is fixed and definite. it isn't someone political or religious views, there are no different points of views. it's either right or wrong. and, i'm 100% certain people don't consider themselves geniuses for doing grade 5 math, they are just laughing at you for not being able to do it. Anonymous Coward 25764830 read my post above this, laugh if you want, still you are wrong Anonymous Coward 32726085 yeah, calculators are wrong too. |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32726085 Germany 01/21/2013 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ...exactly, and this was written numerous times now, but people still want to fight about 1or 9 ... and all of them think, they are such geniuses, but only show their narrow mind as they cannot understand both points of view... Anonymous Coward 32726085 math is fixed and definite. it isn't someone political or religious views, there are no different points of views. it's either right or wrong. and, i'm 100% certain people don't consider themselves geniuses for doing grade 5 math, they are just laughing at you for not being able to do it. Anonymous Coward 25764830 read my post above this, laugh if you want, still you are wrong Anonymous Coward 32726085 yeah, calculators are wrong too. Anonymous Coward 25764830 if you would just check it, instead of bullshitting around, you would see for yourself... you are the idiot, not me... ;) |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32776229 United States 01/21/2013 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 3 friends rent a room for the night and the clerk charges them $30 or $10 each. The manager comes back and says they were charged too much so he gives the clerk $5 to give back to the men. The clerk gives each man back $1 and he keeps $2. The 3 men each paid $9 for the room which is $27 and the $2 the clerk has is $29. where is the other dollar? Quoting: MHz Of the original $30 the men got $3 back, and the clerk got $2. There is no other dollar. The men paid $27 for a $25 room. Clerk has a $2 tip. |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 32614604 Australia 01/21/2013 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes if the OP knew how to right an equation on a keyboard. Quoting: 3/1 is a fraction not a divide so he messed up big time. 3/1(1+2) in this form is a fraction times a whole number. This what the equation should look like OP 3÷1(1+2)= X NOT 3/1(1+2) WHICH IS ONCE AGAIN A FRACTION TIMES A WHOLE NUMBER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anonymous Coward 12786780 so? you can multiply a fraction by a whole number. for example: what is half of ten? |

CalmShockUser ID: 5056346 Canada 01/22/2013 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Related Threads

- Pentagon Announces It Will Quarantine Soldiers Returning From Ebola Mission
- Nintendo is making a fatigue and sleep-tracking health device
- Pope Francis: ‘Evolution of Nature Is Not Inconsistent With the Notion of Creation’
- Government Agencies Are Secretly Going Through Your Snail Mail, Too
- Breast Cancer Charity Accused of Partnering with Corporations Linked to Cancer-Causing Products
- Rising Global Temperatures from Climate Change Linked to Increase in Violence
- Flight MH17 - What You're Not Being Told
- Lowe’s Hires Robots for the Holidays
- Chicago Official Illegally Offers Cash, Prizes for People who Vote
- 7 in 10 Young Americans Too Fat, Uneducated, or Criminal to Join Army
- Reid warns of impeachment fears in fundraising email
- Obamacare Covers Foreign Diplomats
- New Crystal Could Let Divers Breathe Underwater
- Scientists Found Signs Of Life Deeper In The Earth Than Ever Before
- Ex-CBS reporter says government bugged her computer
- Businesses and schools prep for civil unrest in Ferguson
- Muslim Leader Warns Canada It’s ‘Under Attack’
- Did You Hear? Texas Plans to Fingerprint EVERYONE within the Next 12 Years
- Now We Will Watch How The Stock Market Performs Without The Fed’s Monetary Heroin
- Globalization = Permanent Instability
- Google Pill to Diagnose Disease
- WTO Says U.S. Consumers Don’t Need to Know Where Meat Comes From
- A Dallas Company Finds Profit in Video-Only Jail Visitations http://www.
- Why Are TV Stations Advertising Viagra to Children?
- Pope Contradicts Genesis Account of Creation, Argues ‘God and Evolution’ Are Compatible