|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Ladies and gentlemen, Boys and Girls I give you ~ 100% DOOM!!!! 1 Day only! ~ Friday 15th February 2013 ~ (Updated)
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Just the facts! |
|
Post Content
|
...
So, what in your opinion would be the yeild should the asteroid explode within the upper atmosphere?
Quoting: Just the facts! Um, my yield? My guess is that it couldn't possibly explode, it would burn up upon entering our atmosphere, but depending on the size, that would be of little matter. It would hit earth and cause a massive amount of damage. It would depend on the size of the asteroid. I'm not sure what you're getting at? Well, the common belief is that the Tunguska, Siberia, blast of 1908 was an airborne event, Ok! So, it follows that potentially so could this be and if it was then the resulting detention could react with those brief but very energetic anti-matter particles. You see a nuclear detonation in 1962 managed to do it, so why can't this? I can't see what would be any different? If I remember right, they have already said that the amount of anti-protons in the belt, at any given time, is less than 30 (not to mention, they are rapidly producing and being destroyed). I'm no physicist, but even if it were possible to "ignite" the belt, that wouldn't be enough to do anything spectacular. GLP needs a physicists, but I'm pretty sure common sense is enough in the particular situation. NO, no the energy of the antiprotons has been measured in the range from 60-750 MeV, so 30? Can't see that? You see, the fact that the government managed to ignite it back in '62 would seem to make your argument a nonsense, unless you can explain how it didn't happen?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
