Adam Lanza's SSDI Death Record States He Died 1 Day Before Sandy Hook Event (Dec 13, 2012) - Added: FOIA Statement of Death Matches Dec 13 Date

Our first shill!

Don't be so simple-minded.

This isn't about just "typos all over the net".

It's about several incongruencies with the official narrative.

ROTFL.

That guy isn't a shill, MORAN.
The SS# was issued in NH.

they are correct.

PS: The record does NOT come up via a ancestry.com, familysearch.com, or familytreelegends.com SSDI search.

Wow, great kitten! :)

:Smiley:

26 People killed by a ghost with guns. Well I suppose that's a first.

Maybe if I had seen some genuine grieving, I would be less inclined to be so ruthless and graphic in my graphic denouncing of this charade.

On the other hand, type in someone you personally know who died. They will come up accurately on this site ...

So unless you believe that this is a fake site that is so smart it can read your mind, it must be legit.

To be clear, I do not believe the official Sandy Hook narrative. I am not a shill. I want to get the creeps that did this myself.

But to be fair I tested this database by looking up my father's death record. They have the date of his death 4 days prior to the actual day that he died. So maybe this website isn't necessarily all that accurate?

Maybe others can think of someone they know the exact day they died and see what they come up with.

If it were a typo then why does Thursday agree with it being the 13th?

A typo would be Friday, Dec.13.
Or Thursday, Dec. 14th.
Or Froday Dec. 14th.
etc.

I searched on Family Search and found no matching results for an Adam Lanza, death in CT.

[link to familysearch.org (secure)]

Also, a search for a birth for Adam Lanza showed no results, even when searching the year range 1991-1993 (age 19-21 yrs of age)

[link to familysearch.org (secure)]

So why would one website show results and another one not, when they are both supposedly drawing from the same SS index?


And searching same website for Emilie Parker, born in Utah, 2006 yielded no results when go to the website and enter those search terms . This is what I got on the page:

Search Results from Historical Records

No records found for > Name : Emilie Parker, Event : Birth, Place: Utah, Event Range : 2006-2006


Try your own search and see.

[link to familysearch.org (secure)]

I have a jpg of it but don't know how to post it here.

This it the genealogical website sponsored by the Mormon church. Wasn't it said that the Parker family is Mormon? Isn't it strange she wasn't in that database when I first search, considering the emphasis Mormon church puts on family records?

But wait, there's more.

So then I post the link

[link to familysearch.org (secure)]

to the webpage in this forum post and test it while in preview and the information changes when I test the link. Now it does show her listed.

WTF! So can someone explain all of this?

Just like we can't be sure Osama Bin Laden was captured in May of 2011.

They've been doing this in more recent events where they aren't showing any proof, as like they did with Columbine with all the photographic evidence. We're just suppose to take their word for it.

I know that when a loved one dies, even a pet, people in the process of grieving, if they didn't see the body might suddenly doubt whether it happened, or that they were actually dead. It can cause a person to freak out and not have closure. I can imagine that the children's parents are going to go through that. Let's hope at some point one of them demands to have a grave exhumed.

It could be also some "joker" employee at the site with the access to the web servers. You have seen other "jokers" editing and backdating FB pages. Some people just have weird sense of humor.

Nope.. just 26 more SS#'s to sell or to give out for certain needs in certain job sectors or the WPP

Glitch in the Matrix by the sound of it.

Occam's Razor:

A psychotic 20 year old 'outcast', undoubtedly hopped up on drugs [er, meds] got so paranoid and pissed off he killed his semi-crazy mom, then went to a nearby elementary school, and killed the head mistress, a couple of teachers and a classroom full of 1st graders before killing himself when he ralized the police had shown up.

1) The kid came from a dysfunctional and broken family; financially well off and well educated but dysfunctional never-the-less.

2) By every account given of him, he obviously had at the very least high functioning Autism or Asperger's. He may well have had an additional psychiatric issue, including possibly a so-called personality disorder, possibly even the somewhat early onset of schizophrenia.

3) One very unusual aspect is his mom was a firearm's collector [that's fine], but she apparently didn't secure them so her batshit crazy son could get his hands on them. Not only that, she took him target practicing. Way to go,mom...R.I.P.

4) His only brother hadn't spoken to him in 2 years [!], and his dad was estranged. How a dad becomes estranged from his mentally ill 20 year old son I have difficulty in understanding. But it sounds like his old man just threw $ at his ex-wife [Adam's mom] to take care of the problem. Pretty typical of people in the socioeconomic background, actually.

So they took a guy that was dead gave his identity to someone else ? This new Lanza was the actor in the sandy hook event?

I figured he was killed and then transported to the shootings.

They are running low on SS#'s and names to give out and sell to the stock market.

Follow the $$$$$$ trail

any big p o l i c y cashed in ??

here is my challenge to you. find a recent shooting that has at least 3 discrepancies in the reporting that you can find. if you can provide that evidence, i might believe what you have to say.

use skype

Occam's razor.

A 6 foot 120 pound geek is wearing a tactical vest that only fits 180 pound men. He has 12 18oz 30 round mags flapping against his thighs, 2 handguns and their mags "somewhere" in there as well, as he stumbles through a jagged hole in a glass door.

He begins firing from an AR-15 in an enclosed area with no carpeting to dampen the acoustics, and even wearing earplugs, immediately goes deaf from the 165 decibel explosions. People are NOT running toward him trying to "stop" him with their bodies (Occam's razor), but fleeing, hiding, maybe throwing items at him. This untrained wimp is firing madly, and after 20 rounds begins to become seriously disoriented as his deafness becomes painful. He is stumbling trying to keep his aim straight while maneuvering around desks and fallen items.

He stops to reload. Begins firing again at someone he sees running out the door trying to escape. With each report of the rifle his head throbs, the acrid cordite burns his throat.

Next, with no motive, he seeks out a classroom full of tiny children and turns his brain to mush after firing another magazine of 30 rounds, missing his targets wildly as they scatter screaming and running hither and tither.

He passes out.

These sites showing deceased people use different sources, that is why some sites will show certain people and other sites don't. genealogybank.com seems to be using local newspapers as their source, most of the other sites use the "Social Security Death Master File" ( [link to www.ssdmf.com (secure)] ).

Too bad it costs money to directly access the database.

Yep! honestly, at this point WE ARE BEING LEAD BY THE HAND.....why?

My theory:they're going to make a run at both the first and the second with the same event. since they've planted all these anomalies through out the whole event, you can be damn sure they have concrete evidence debunking them all.

they're going to say our free speech was used to incite panic against the King and Cort. the king will probably sacrifice the MSM in place of a "State run media, so you can be sure the information is correct and well regulated for public consumption"(the sheep will bob their heads, completely oblivious of the fact it's already ran by the fed). they'll probably start laying down some draconian restrictions on the internet because it was "complicit" in spreading unrest, just like guns were "complicit" in murdering all those children.

just a thought..

Your memory is indeed quite correct:

"Connecticut school shooting: One of gunman's parents found dead in New Jersey Connecticut School Shooting December 14, 2012 By: Danny Cox

It is known that he lived in Connecticut and was 20-years old, but now there is a little bit more that has been revealed. One of the gunman's parents was found dead in their New Jersey home earlier Friday morning.


MSNBC is reporting that early on Friday morning, one of the late gunman's parents was found dead in their New Jersey home. It is not known if it was his mother or his father. Two guns were also found in the home.

20-years-old

Lived in Connecticut, but parents lived in New Jersey"


This report is a good example of the mistakes which were made which were never followed up and corrected....

Adam was using his older brothers ID... OK but his brother is 24 not twenty... If a squad car went to the address on the ID and found a dead body... this little error is not so easy to dismiss out-of-hand. Do officers routinely lie about finding dead bodies and guns? Wrong address? Then there is still a dead body, plus guns, but whose? No follow up of course. Another dangling false-hood.

Then the Mom is found to be dead. How prescient of the false story to ACTUALLY be the truth!

Now that is some hot-shot sleuthing going on here. Stories are plastered all over the news, with the wrong name, wrong age, wrong home addresses and wrong resident locations, plus few remember that Nancy was also found dead in Adams residence (that story is still out there) and not a single word about that either (even on here) just to cover all the amazing facts which were not... but the detectives finally found the right dead body--- at the right address--- by the killer who has no other Id or anything else apparently.

Nothing stinky here.....

That's certainly possible---I looked on ancestry.com and found an entry for Nancy Lanza died Dec 14 but there was no entry at all for Adam.

Went to US Social Security website; you have to subscribe to one of their index services for info. I'm sure even a year or two ago they had a free online lookup because I used it in the past.

We all know they want to censor the internet. But if they do that the sheeple will awaken in mass. The sheeple are addicted to facebook.

I was just informed that the numbers correspond to the president who ordered them...and he said these numbers are JFK's and Obamas would be in the "13's"

OP, the site you went to must have gotten that record before the govt erased it. Those geneology sites do pick up official records from Social Security.

They must have jerked it from the US government's site because Adam's record is NOT there now. I just went to the Social Security Administration Office's web site, paid $10 for a single online inquiry and the search came back "no results". I tried to copy the page, but couldn't.

They do have a disclaimer that says a record might not turn up, even though you may know for sure that the person is dead. No explanation for why that might happen.

Prior to that I had gone on ancestry.com and found Nancy Lanza but nothing for Adam.

Quick clean-up job!

Last Edited by Ralph--a house dog on 01/20/2013 10:28 PM