The Egyptians DID NOT build the pyramids......

from the top

Thread: European Dedication to the African Origins of Kemet-Black Egypt

Nakht With his Family Hunting the Nile Marshes


IMAGE ( [link to i47.tinypic.com] )



IMAGE ( [link to i49.tinypic.com] )



IMAGE ( [link to i45.tinypic.com] )


Blonde Africans

IMAGE ( [link to i49.tinypic.com] )



IMAGE ( [link to i50.tinypic.com] )


Another one in Another area of painting

IMAGE ( [link to i49.tinypic.com] )

i think the power plant theory makes alot of sense

Providing one link against one man is hardly justification for denial...

Reptilian imagery is common throughout the western half of the world, and if they were not lizardmen per se, they were a cannibalistic entity.

In mexico the mayas used to throw their human sacrifices into pits, for he purpose of feeding/appeasing the gods - who we now were hardly godlike at all, and this strange, backward concept exists even today.

But I digress, and we are simply discussing semantics.

So then as you do not believe in reptillians, who would you surmize built the ancient structures?

When they did the math on the outside diameter circle, and the inner diameter cirle, my ears bled a little. Than they did the Sphynx's line of site demo. I started thinking about the two and thought about the extremly straight lines at Nasca, The run way looking ones. Where do they point when the Sphynx is looking at the "Lions Heart"? I also thought about the "Expanding Earth" theory, and how it affects all these alignments. Please see.

I have no intetion of taking the discussion of track. Just some thoguhts. Great stuff.

Last Edited by NervousAndJerky on 01/20/2013 11:06 PM

truly amazing!

mind = blown

not trying to get into a pissing contest over reptilian history with you friend....

Google 'David dIcke Reptilian Theory'.....

There are HUNDREDS (if not thousands) of sources that discredit the theory... not just one link.

Last Edited by Dr. Charles Norris on 01/20/2013 11:12 PM

Hey Canuck - where do you live? I'm in Ottawa and my studies started 30 years ago, with the ending message of this fantastic video - catastrophism - which invertly lead me to study these ancient megalithic sites. It seems like I did everything in reverse, but ended with the same conclusions and guess what? I work in the Federal Department of Natural Resources and have access to the most emminent scientits working in all of these climate change fields.

Here are the books that started my journey:
Earth in Upheaval
Worlds in Collision
Ages of Chaos

At 60 years of age, I now have the means to jouney to each of these sites and am looking for like minded people. If only they would open the last door in the Queen's chamber shafts - then maybe the light will finally shine on these megalithic enigmas. Post your email and I'll try to contact you.

Cheers and have a great day !!!

The reptilians were humanoid. Generally, they were of mixed et races. They did not eat people.

There were tribes who refused education, and who stayed drunk and f'd up. These tribes were cannibals, and extremely violent.
After et's would leave, even peaceful societies tended to revert back to more tribalistic ways after a generation or two.

Wow what?

Video left me speechless....

I know people are quick to feel that the general masses of people are inept. But that is simply not true, I believe the revelation of information has done a lot to distract us from current events but nevertheless as a race of people we know far more now than any man before us.

I would beg to differ and say, what if at one point the idea of Atlantis is from a far ancient race pre-ice age? How do we know anything and why are we so naive to believe that we could not have survived through the worst up to 'modern' times?

It may just so possible that we are the oldest beings on earth?

Go back a lil further, Enoch, Job, shepards and possibly angels. Check out what the Angel "Uriel machine" is.
The pyramids are pre-flood, the proof is in the pudding.

Why people simply accept the ridiculous theories put forward by the academics in regards to the pyramids and other megalithic structures found on earth, in stark contrast to what there own eyes tell them, is the real mystery.

I wrote a paper many years ago as culmination of the research I had undertaken over a period of many years. I set out to prove using simple economic metrics that the modern theories were dead wrong. I also pointed out that the theory fails to account for a glaring error or defect in the actual design. If the Giza pyramid was indeed built for the burial and wealth repository of Khufu WHY did it fail in such a spectacular manner?

The coffin box has no genuine similarity to a sarcophagus, especially one which was to convey the greatness of such an extraordinary ruler. The lack of any writing on the inside of the great pyramid also begs the question of why its perfect interior walls have no ACTUAL Egyptian functions/qualities/motifs period.

The top chamber was closed from the inside by a single cord which lowered blocks preventing access. Common sense logic seems to be not a part of modern theories which twist simple facts to fit their wretched conclusions. Why would a king have a room designed to close from the inside? And if this was successful... to this very day that room would be blocked by those stones! No mention of this factor of the interior engineering is discussed by the so called experts who simply ignore any fact which does not support the fantasy they believe in and defend.

Take a simple step back and wonder how the very best proof of a "higher civilization" hmmm perhaps called "gods" in ancient times, was reduced to a laughing joke by modern man?

The film left out allot of information but it was good to see they were at least pointing out the consistent factors of these mega sites and the precise mathematical relationships these structures embodied, thereby, telling us modern man about the real makers AND their level of abilities compared to our own even today.

MY original paper has long since disappeared from the web, but I am sure eventually some one else will come along and point out, that if a theory is to hold its weight, it has to start with real facts and not modernized myths. My paper was based on the Multiplier-Effect which is quite simple and requires nothing more than basic math. For example: how many cooks are needed to feed both slaves and guards? Just to answer that simple question involves a much more significant population then has ever been postulated for good reason. Very little is known about the Khufu era, despite the glaring oddity he (and his sons) had giant pyramids in which to leave a fully illustrated history.

If a king has to expend HIS entire countries wealth to build his final resting place.... how did his sons follow in his foot-steps and oddly enough, also fail to achieve the very thing modern theories demand people to believe?

'We spent the family fortune on masons and could not hire a beggar to write our own names....'

The world is a very funny place.

Great video!!!

This kind of stuff is what keeps me coming back to GLP when the doom gets stale XD

There was not much that I have not come across in the past, but this video did a very good job of putting everything together and connecting the dots.

5 stars and a bump from me!

Yes, literally. This video gave me a new respect for math and I loathe math.

This film is fundamentally misleading.

It is true that current day equipment would not be able to build the pyramids, BUT THERE IS A TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD, but has simply been forgotten about for many decades.

For years, like everyone else, I was left wondering how the pyramids were built, until one day, I suddenly realised that I could not work it out because I was asking the WRONG QUESTIONS.

Like everyone else, I kep asking...

- How did they get all that stone up to the top of mountanis in places like Delphi and the pyramids of the ancient Mayans?
- How did they move big blocks uphill, abandoning some half way up the mountainside?
- How did they manage to spread the culture and knowledge around the globe?
- How did they manage to build with such big blocks of stone?
- How did they manage to build all the ley lines in perfect aling\nment?

THis gets you NOWHERE.

The REAL QUESTIONS are the same, but start with WHY not HOW.

Once you start asking this, there is a blindingly simple answer so devastatingly obvious, that it answer everything else.

>>>>Hey Canuck - where do you live?

...I'm in Aylmer, and I am CONVINCED that I know how and why Stonehenge and the Pyramids were built.

I've done the maths and it DOES all stack up.

Well now that we all realize this, lets think back to Stonehenge. No ancient technology could have lifted and arranged those stones perfectly!
ALIENS

That's what life will be like when we advance--right now it's like we as a whole can't handle the truth.

But I agree with you 100% forget heaven--I'm so not interested--what you describe is what I'm after.

OCCAM'S RAZOR.

So, just why would primative man build vast edifices?

...Because it was EASIER.

Why would primative man build on the tops of mountains instead of in the valleys?

...Because it was EASIER.

Why would primative man build with huge slabs of stone instead of small ones?

...Because it was EASIER.

Why would primative man set out very straight ley lines?

...Because it was EASIER.


...And just why did they abandon stones half way up a mountain side?

...Because ti was EASIER - and why? because these stones wer not ones being hauled uphill - the abandoned stones were ones on the way DOWNHILL.

maybe joseph the son of jacob built them for the seven years of famine

see the original "planet of the apes" movie.
dr. zaius explains why.

the knowledge of our past is hidden

Consider the following...a;; the pyramdis sites of the Ancient Mayans and Egyptians have a whole series of things in common

- THese areas were inhabited by pigs/wild boar
- These areas were thickly wooded (at least at the time)
- These areas are associated with the trade winds
- These temple complexes all have vast dead straight wide roads stretching for approxiamtely a mile through them

And standing stone circles were all built in areas with the following in common...

- Presence of corrupted or saline water (eg marsh, river or sea)
- Presence of horse and worship of horses
- Presence of salt
- At one end of the transatlantic trade winds.
- At one end of the Ley Lines.
- Often found with TWO circles, a small one near the sea/river/marsh and a big main one.

>>>>>No ancient technology could have lifted and arranged those stones perfectly!

UNTRUE! THere is one and, as I can see it, ONLY one ancient technology that could have done it. So I ran the figure and it is stunning! It drops out correctly.

According to my calculations, doing by this one particular means would have taken 21.8 years to have built the pyramids, and history records that it took them just under 22 years!

The similarity of the sites, to me, demonstrates the ancients accessing PRECISELY the resources necessary to construct this type of technoology.

...And, furthermore, the fact that Puma Punkuu is under 5 miles from Basaltic Florspar, to me makes this a "no-brainer". It is OBVIOUS that thyis is how they constructed the pyramids.

Remember, the Ley lines not only connect the major temple sites across Europe, but they ALSO run EXACTLY through the Alps through low lying passes.