Why the moon landing was NOT a hoax

Bingo !
The man in the dumb hat is shilling hard!

Look at what the "moon astroNOTss" said and did upon returning!

Look at them, think about what was going on in 1969.

We never put men on the moon.

Wake up before you have too.

Link? And confession noted, they "lost" the origional footage......lol.

Dumb hat thinks he knows what was and was not available to the NASA asshats in 1969? How does he "know"?
Really. Really, his point is it would have been EASYER to go than to fake it? Really?
Think people......there are many layers of protective truth yet to be revealed.....guess who said that before he died.

From the youtube original video description:
Published on Dec 3, 2012
collins is not sure if men went to the moon. but he is sure they could not have faked it.
Show more
All Comments

Comments are disabled for this video.
(so much for free speech)

From his channel link:
[link to www.postwar.nl]
Postwar Media is the creative company of writer / director S G Collins.
Collins creates media to help people and companies tell their stories.
He lives and works in Amsterdam.

From:
[link to davesweb.cnchost.com]

'Here is another thing that I sometimes wonder about: why it is that in the 1960s we possessed the advanced technology required to actually land men on the Moon, but in the 21st century we don’t even have the technology required to get an unmanned craft close enough to the Moon to take usable photographs? Or could it be that there’s just nothing there to photograph?'

Are you on drugs?

What EXACTLY would you call LRO?

LRO

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

0.64 Mega pixel?

LRO Official NASA page

[link to www.nasa.gov]

Wiki LRO page

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Please keep in mind that this thread is not about the Moon hoax yes or no, but about if it was possible to fake it (i.e the TV coverage)

That's the best we can do?
Why no "moon rovers"?
Like the man said......40 years and that's the pic we get?
You just proved his point.
Think you twits think and look at where we are.
NASA lied!

Why no moon rovers?

Think that stuff we left would be valuable by now?
40 years ageing on the moon.....ripe for testing?

We can't even get a uesable photo.

Buzz still wants to drink it all away.

Neil tried to spell it out for YOU.....many layers of protected truth,....
Use your noodle.... We never went in 69.....and we couldn't aford to say so.

You mean the suitcase folding car, that just assembled itself with no pictures of the lunar assembly phases?
The one car that the designers also lost all the diagrams for?

You're unable to see that they look shiny? Google doesn't work for you? How sad.

Word AND actions!

Some geologist: "Ooh, that's a nice rock. Can you take a closer look?"
Astronaut saunters over to take a closer look.
Some geologist: "Very interesting. Please bring it along."

That same rock turns up later in a laboratory where it is deemed a rock from another celestial body.

There's dozens of hours of that. Hollywood can't even make a 90-minute movie without loads of continuity errors.


The dust is blown away by the rocket exhaust.
By what magic does it return to the spot it was blown away from?


IOW, like all hoaxies your utterly ignorant of the design of the LM.

Ask an actually aerospace engineer what he expects from a pure non-atmospheric lander.
The specifics of the LM are taught in engineering classes today as an outstanding example of space engineering.
In the real world form follows function, and real world physical restraints, a problem Hollywood designers don't have to bother with.


Dave must have the world record for how many times one can be wrong.
He's never ever right about anything.



You are a sheeple.

You mindlessly regurgitate the lies propagated by the hoax-proponents without any critical thought or any independent research.

For your challenge:
Fucking PROOF that there are no deployment images or designs available for the LRV.

________________________________________________________


Again.
You believe only Apollo 11 was hoaxed?

Did you read my link?


NASA has nothing to proof to people who already ignore a veritable Mount Everest of evidence.
When these images came available the hoaxies just moved their rocket-propelled goalposts to a different continent.
Just as everybody who knows them (including me) had said they would.

Nothing will ever be good enough for the hoaxies.
Their position is not based on evidence but on ignoring evidence, so no evidence will ever change their minds.

IOW hoaxies are basically irrational, their believes are like a religion, "NASA lies" is a a dogma of the Church ot the Hoax.
Meanwhile rational people shake their heads.


YOU didn't get these pictures.

WE, space enthusiasts, did.


A vile and slanderous accusation based on nothing but an argument from ignorance.

And you're to deep down the rabbit-hole to notice that the people laughing are laughing AT you.


Darryl Cunningham Investigates The Moon Hoax [link to darryl-cunningham.blogspot.com]
Moon Base Clavius, for all your debunking needs [link to www.xmission.com]

You havent seen the footage? That is a backup.

Oh please. Everyone knows we didn't go to the moon. Its made of cheese.

Who is supposed to take pictures when it is a two man job? Why do you need pictures when there is video?

[link to www.youtube.com]

Why no moon rovers?

Come on shills

Why no real pictures?
Asshats

here's a nut grabber.

When they video the moon bugger wankering around the moon surface and the dust is being kicked up but comes down just as fast as if it were in the gravity of earth but wait you moon knuckle kissers, the moon has less gravitational stickiness to matter so that shit flying up from the moon as dust and shit should of stayed suspended in the zero gravitational BS cause if its anything like back on earth, the stuff is liter and should remain suspended longer.

But thats not the case and the shit never happened on the moon.

Very good.

Now look up the term "link budget."

Bingo. There are so many ridiculous inconsistencies in the official moon landing story that you would need to write a book to list them all (and people have).

That is one of the standard replies given to the $4 whores.

The only pics I could find of the cross hair and the flag were scans made in 1998 and 2004, they could easily have been touched up. are the originals still available. How do you wash out something next to the film itself?

Last Edited by MHz on 01/23/2013 09:25 PM

@ 4:00 he mentions that the cameras were set for daytime exposure, not true, the f-stop had a big lever attached.

If the cross hairs disappear on a white background why are two visible in this photo?

[link to images.nationalgeographic.com]

Suspended? In what? the nonexistent air? Zero gravity? You forget that the Moon has 1/6 gravity?

The dust comes down in perfect parabolic arcs due to no air resistance and comes down at the speed expected for 1/6 gravity. On Earth fine dust often stays up longer dues to air resistance and aerosolization.

Wow.

This is "heavy boots" stuff here!

One day he may even figure out the Moon is in a vacuum...

I told you.
NASA doesn't fucking care what YOU want.

I bet 500 Euro that when the X-Prize rover visits one of the landing sites you lot will claim it's all CGI.
It's will just be more evidence to handwave away.
Funny you guys don't actually lift-off.



Deliberate lie, or very bad observation skills.


Suspended?

In what?


You're an idiot.

(Or a NASA shill determined to make hoaxies look even dumber than usual.)



Yet none of them has ever actually been proven.

It's just a long list of brain-farts, misunderstandings, lies, confabulations, and sheer stupidity.

Meanwhile the hoax-promoters whose websites you click and whose books you buy are laughing all the way to the bank.
So many sheeple they fleeced.

Why going to name calling?

I'm trying to keep an open mind here:)

This thread is more about the possibility of faking the video.

But it seems to become a Hoax or not thread.

Halcyon Dayz, can you please give us more info on the rover dish antenna? like where did it broadcast to? frequencies aiming etc. We are talking about moving dish here!

Also more info about the data communication protocols and error corrections in latency of minimum 1 second, modem models and data speeds will also be welcome :)

Thanks

Laughing my ass off at how the lander looks like its made from cardboard boxes

This episode of a FOX TV show titled *Conspiracy Theory* was aired on February 2001.