Do you believe pegging is morally wrong ???

What gay agenda?

You mean the right to exist without fucks like you breathing down their necks?

I don't have a problem with that. No mature individual should have a problem with that.

Maybe we should focus more on destroying the bigot agenda... maybe someone should come slap you down.

name dropper.

Dude, you got him good you fucker!!!

Get back in the CLOSET NOW.
:fandango"s:

Hmph! When I was a teen-ager, "pegging" was what you did with your jeans/slacks. You'd take the bottom seam around the ankle and "take it in" until it was tight around your ankle, sort of like the opposite of "bell-bottoms". The only thing "wrong" with it was that it made your butt look three times bigger than it really was. Oh, and then once you'd "pegged" your jeans, you would go sit in a hot bathtub (still wearing the jeans) and then get out and let them dry (and shrink) on you. Talk about looking "painted on"!!

But obviously this is not what you're referring to in this thread.

Holy shit! I regret looking that up now! LOL!

What gay agenda?




THE PROPAGANDA SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATS DAILY IN EVERY SHAPE, FORM and AVENUE. (pun intended)

I'm all for live and let live...and you having your rights to have Civil Unions......but the GAY AGENDA PROPAGANDA has GOT TO GO.

KUDOS TO PUTIN for keeping a core value of FAMILIES and CULTURE intact.



Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 01/22/2013 10:54 PM

That's what I thought it was to.
Something the Flock of Seagulls crowd did.

Never heard of it, but maybe all gals out there should give this a whirl..give the guys a taste of their own medicine.

Why would you ask?

You assumed I'm gay because I don't have a problem with gay people.

That right there is a big red flag that my time is wasted on you, since you already think you have everything figured out, but I'll cling to hope for now.

Homosexuality is biological.

No straight people are in danger of turning gay. You can't change your own sexual orientation.

No gay people will ever be made straight. You certainly can't change their sexual orientation either.

So, tell me oh clever sir, if logic dictates that gay people will continue to exist regardless, and that nobody can change their sexual orientation, how is seeing them in the media possibly going to make a difference to anyone?

If a certain percentage of people are gay, they deserved to be represented proportionally in the media. Simple as that.

We know nobody's gonna turn gay by seeing gays, that's scientifically impossible.

So what are you so afraid of then? Afraid there's something in your closet? Because I can see no other reason for you to get worked up over gays.

Also, Putin is a dictator, a fascist, and if you think he is any better for the Russian people than the Czars of the past, you're an idiot.

all this stuff has the same outcome - asses that leak and eventual adult diapers.

here's some logic

- if their faces look like they are in pain then it ain't fun.

"So what are you so afraid of then? Afraid there's something in your closet? Because I can see no other reason for you to get worked up over gays."

That is every Gay person retort.
To say it's biological? that hasn't been proven - that's just hypotheses.

Truth is, it's a dangerous way to live. It goes against nature. To each their own - but I believe it's the advertising ad nausea where the backlash stems from - not stereotyping.

2 cents

Anytime somebody asks is something is morally wrong---guess what? They already know the answer....just want someone to tell them it isn't!

I must be old fashioned. I've always been quite content with plain old sex.

I don't have a problem with GAY people either.
Nor did I think you were gay...that was never the issue.
You ASSUME wrong.

....and missed the ENTIRE point of the AGENDA and PROPAGANDA BLITZ.



Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 01/22/2013 11:26 PM

So did I....
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

That is a wiki link so don't fucking ban me!

Actually, yes it has been proven.

Furthermore, I'll prove it to you right now.

You know the only thing that makes a tit or penis more exiting than, say, earlobes, is due to chemical reactions in our brains based on stimuli. A vagina gets us going because your brains are hard-wired to find certain things sexually attractive. That is the definition of sexual orientation.

You cannot edit your sexual orientation at will. I dare you to try. If you like vaginas, you will always like vaginas. Go print a picture of a penis and stare at it. (or if you like dick by default, go stare at a vagina).

Now you stare at that picture for a little while, and you see if you can will yourself into becoming attracted to it.

Go ahead and try, I'll wait.

No?

Nothing happening?

You can't suddenly make yourself like penis?

Well, I guess it's biological then, you moron.

Yes you did.

"I'm all for live and let live...and you having your rights to have Civil Unions......"

Did you not just say that to me?

FAIL. Gays are conditioned to think it's natural. Truth is, most of them do it for acceptance, because they were molested and can't cope with it, etc.

I used to hate beer, but I tried it enough times that I now can appreciate a good ale now and then. That must mean I was born loving beer, right?

Shut up poo fucker.

You know you love cock.

Damn fags.

I used to hate beer, but I tried it enough times that I now can appreciate a good ale now and then. That must mean I was born loving beer, right?


How the fuck would you know? That's bullshit and doesn't stand up to logic.

Most gays were never molested.

Most people who were molested are straight.

Therefore you're full of shit.

So you made yourself like beer. So you're telling me, then, is that you could make yourself like penis too? Well go right ahead then! Prove it, asshole.

Unless you can make yourself like penis, you're a fucking tool to suggest gays can turn straight.

Not morally wrong, but if you can it two or three then that's fucking weird.

Run out of logical arguments?

Can't admit you're full of shit?

Nothing more to say huh?

You've just been outdone. Go fuck yourself.

How the fuck would you know? That's bullshit and doesn't stand up to logic.

Most gays were never molested.

Most people who were molested are straight.

Therefore you're full of shit.

So you made yourself like beer. So you're telling me, then, is that you could make yourself like penis too? Well go right ahead then! Prove it, asshole.

Unless you can make yourself like penis, you're a fucking tool to suggest gays can turn straight.


Many gays can and do turn straight. There are entire programs and ministries dedicated to this. Just one of many things that prove your whole premise is BS.

It's been proven that alcoholism has a genetic root. But many with the gene AREN'T alcoholics, and many alcoholics don't have the gene. Choices.

"You" is meant rhetorically.

...and the only way you would take that the wrong way was, if you were in in fact gay, and had a guilty conscience.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 01/22/2013 11:46 PM

Wrong again, asshole.

"On May 17, 2012 the Pan American Health Organization stated that services that purport to "cure" people with non-heterosexual sexual orientations lack medical justification and represent a serious threat to the health and well-being of affected people, and noted that the professional consensus is that homosexuality is a natural variation of human sexuality and cannot be regarded as a pathological condition."
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Know what else? Exodus International, America's leading Christian "ex-gay" institution. They themselves concluded that they cannot turn homosexuals straight.

In January 2012 the current president of Exodus International, Alan Chambers, during his address to a Gay Christian Network conference, stated that 99.9% of conversion therapy participants do not experience any change to their sexuality and apologized for the previous Exodus slogan "Change Is Possible".
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

You sure have a point to prove huh?

Don't worry, it's not called pegging when your taking from a dude.

You're on the wrong thread anyhow. As weird as pegging might be, at least a woman is involved. So, it's straight.

Go find a fag thread already.

Well, what IS the definition of pegging?

Is there some underlying thing like over at Jizzmopper's, or do you need a$$pounding that will someday result in a between-the-eyes shot of bigtime std's because this pegging is a substitute for some deeper need that is or will be expressed in riskier ways for all concerned when/if it becomes not enough.

Honesty about why is morality.