I love how all of these articles start off with the "parental reactions" as if that's the biggest inconsistency in all of this.

"Supposed" inconsistencies. There's nothing "supposed" about them.

"man who was allegedly chased in the woods nearby the school;"

Uh, no, nothing "alleged" about it. A man was being chased in the woods. Period. And MSM has totally dropped it. Why?

Then he proceeds to cite the Newtown Bee to "debunk" it? "The Newtown Bee, a local outlet, reported that a law enforcement official told them that the man seen in the woods had a gun and was nearby the school."

The same Newtown Bee that quoted the dead principal as describing the gunshots? Yeah Ok.

Not bothering with the rest of this article.