The Blaze's (Snopes) Attempt to Debunk Sandy Hook Conspiracies! Point by Point!

Which one are you again?

But the parents think thier children are dead based off this guys "word". None of them got to see the dead bodies of thier children to identify them. They only saw pictures.

lol so easy to debunk these delusions from paranoid schizoids.

I love how all of these articles start off with the "parental reactions" as if that's the biggest inconsistency in all of this.

"Supposed" inconsistencies. There's nothing "supposed" about them.

"man who was allegedly chased in the woods nearby the school;"

Uh, no, nothing "alleged" about it. A man was being chased in the woods. Period. And MSM has totally dropped it. Why?

Then he proceeds to cite the Newtown Bee to "debunk" it? "The Newtown Bee, a local outlet, reported that a law enforcement official told them that the man seen in the woods had a gun and was nearby the school."

The same Newtown Bee that quoted the dead principal as describing the gunshots? Yeah Ok.

Not bothering with the rest of this article.

Last Edited by Zuzu's Petals on 01/23/2013 06:21 PM

Just another propagandist on the payroll of you know who.

The guy's first two conspiracies he tried to debunk were bunk themselves. I tried to comment about it, and my post was removed. I'm not sure why GB allowed this libtard to post on the blaze. I'm on the fence about him lately. I always thought that Faux News was the controlled opposition and GB was the anomaly. While I still know FN is the controlled opposition, I'm wondering if GB isn't as well.

So this article says the coronor was wrong.

Whose the medical expert snopes or the coronor?

The coronor was mistaken when he said a long gun was used?
Even though the reporter specifically asked and tried to correct him. He said that is incorrect sir not i dont believe that to be the case. He was difinitive in his answer.

He was also asked if the shots were at point blank range.
He said the first 7 victims he examined were shot 3-11 times with a long gun from a distance.

There is no way that there would not be any wounded if he was shooting from a distance using hand guns.

Its just not a believable story.

Here's a comment that I thought made a lot of sense...



Posted on January 23, 2013 at 3:23pm

I guess I have just one question? Where are the wounded?

Children are the most resilient age group and yet there is not one wounded survivor. Not one who a cop found with a pulse, not one that made it to an ambulance and not one that died at the hospital.

All mass shootings have wounded except this one.

Hook, bait and Holloway sinker.

They are in the shed..

It's funny...wounded kept away from emergency workers.

Kids dropped at Gene Rosens' house (instead of firehouse), with no one calling police...

The Blaze coverage is a complete fail. They gave Gene Rosen a complete pass for changing his stories over and over again.

The website is totally changed from what it was a year ago. Now it is half fluff.

GB wants to be a guru.

What ever happened to his "I'm going blind" story?

Don't bother answering that one. I don't really care.

His site is full of ads and pop-ups, so much so that I hate going there. When I do it takes a few seconds to load as it is searching my computer for info on what targeted ads to place on my screen.

I don't see how the hoax could be debunked when there's too many variables to the story that doesn't add up anyways. Too many holes in the entire situation. The MSM and anyone else who try to back up their claims can't even keep their story straight too.

If it did happen where's the dead and the wounded? Why in the hell didn't they allow ambulances closer to the school building? One kid killed that many people without being seen. Plus the fact that children are often times smaller and faster they would be a pretty hard target for one person.

There was also the aerial footage of the school too which did not look like a crime scene or even remotely like there was anything wrong.

And read somewhere they were planning on demolishing the building? Why? Unless there's evidence within that building that could prove that everything that we've been told about the shooting was false.

None of it makes sense and yet they still keep feeding us the same BS in hopes that we're dumb enough to buy it.

Im tired of 9/11 truthers trying to jump on the sandy hook bandwagon.
Im a former wtc2 employee. I had left my job shortly before everything happened and watched in first person as that harrowing day unfolded.
It happened, it went down the way it was reported.
Sandy Hook is weird and different and there are lot of holes in the official story.
But as someone who witnessed 9/11, 9/11 truthers are undermining the story behind Sandy Hook by bringing up their opinions.


To clarify what has not been properly addressed by sandy hook debunkers:
1. Where is CCTV footage ? In this day and age, in a upscale first world place like a CT. School, where is the proof ?
2. Where is the footage of several hundred kids and their parents leaving the school ?
3. Why did certain families react so unnaturally. Seemed super happy shortly after the deaths ?
And dont tell me grief lends itself to outbursts of laughter, smiling.
Im not talking about that. Im talking about family members who were interviewed (such as vickie soto's with a cooper) and acted blissfully happy.
Not normal.
4. In Emilie 's photos, in group shots why does her head look abnormally small compared to her sister who is 2-3 years younger ? The photoshoping I can understand, but not the size discrepancy.

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

smiling happily a few days after family member was murdered ?
Very odd.

LOL, you are the epitome of hypocrite! You demand video of the Sandy Hook tragedy but turn a blind eye to the video not released by the Pentagon on the obvious missile that hit it on 9/11! Good thinkin Lincoln!

And if you are one of the idiots who think the Pentagon did not have video of it then you should just retreat from this site, and redo fifth grade.

Last Edited by Gimme 3 Steps on 01/23/2013 07:46 PM

I just remember Columbine where we had tons of info within the first week. You could sketch out a diagram of the school and the various locations of bombs, shootings, etc with press released info alone. This case is over a month old and still nothing. The media coverage has been one huge cry fest with no hard evidence. No effort has been made to address simple questions, and all inquiry is met with "truther" attacks.

When I heard the other day that Beck was going to 'debunk' the Sandy Hook theories, I realized I was hearing the announcement of his career suicide.

I'm not a conspiracy freak, but this case struck me as being completely wrong from the outset. Every original detail given in the news has been revoked and replaced with a different account...and bit by bit, the later accounts are being proven false. Not *possibly* false...not questionable...proven false. The police are lying..the 'witnesses' are lying...and most of all, the MEDIA is lying.

FINALLY, we have a huge story of great significance and weight that we are starting to be able to PROVE to be a lie...a story that may well finally bring the MSM crashing down due to its having replaced journalism with Pravda-ism. Glenn Beck and Co should be all over this; he's been trying to show them for who/what they really are for years. We're finally catching them in the act with nothing to hide behind.

And instead, the fat boy cowers like Jesse Ventura and plays ball with the enemy.

Where is video from gas stations , stores or any of the privately owend surveillance cameras that are every where.
Showing Adams mothers car traveling to the school? How about fire house footage. This day an age there are cameras every place you go.

Well, to be fair, the truth usually does turn out to be pretty bizarre these days.

NO one killed at Sandy Hoax, yet the media, the police, and the president (yeah) all lie about it constantly.

Bizarro World!

:after_boom:

eureka

Yes, I remember when I was 3 and a 2 yr old picked on me. O the grudges.

Though I'm leaning towards the 'nobody killed' theory, I'm still undecided about that.

But I do not hesitate at all to say that the story we've been fed is a total crock of BS.

Don't you know? They all stood stock-still and patiently waited for him to take precise aim on each of them.

That makes sense, right?

They just want us to run like a dog chasing it's tail on these stupid addenda to the original theories.

Their little cartoons are so weak.

I will tell you, we don't take aim at children. Point,

I agree with you 100%. The only thing that holds me back from the "no one killed theory" is having a whistle blower come out which hasn't happened yet, and I figure someone would be able to spot one or more of the children alive.