Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,716 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,275,536
Pageviews Today: 2,977,324Threads Today: 777Posts Today: 12,664
08:13 PM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Message Subject Besides the Bible's account, {Genesis Chapter 6-9}- What evidence do we see on the earth to confirm there was a global flood?
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
The fact is, mainstream science is secular, and if your scientific research doesn't reach secular conclusions it will be ignored by the secular majority.
 Quoting: Lada D

That is not "fact" at all! Where are you getting this from?
Let me explain it to you since you seem to be a bit confused.

"Mainstream" science studies subjects across the board, without the forethought of whether it is 'blasphemous' or not. Experiments are conducted, data gathered, then the findings are posted and picked at, with the main goal of other scientists to PROVE IT WRONG. If the data from a study, let's say on the grand canyon, suggests that it is older than 6,000 years, this does not automatically make the whole of science "secular". If by "secular", you actually mean without an agenda one way or the other, then yes. What would you rather have, the whole of science only work on problems that relate to the bible, or only post data that suggests that the mythologies of Christianity are true? That would be biased, and that would wholly messed up. But I'm sure that's the way you'd like it. I'm sorry science doesn't concern itself with religion, or proving or disproving biblical theories, it has better things to do.
But at no point in time, should anyone suggest that science has an anti-religious standpoint... That's ridiculous. One doesn't automatically give you the other.
That's like saying someone is a comedian just because they happen to make you laugh. That doesn't make them a professional comedian, its the humor that you added on. And I'm afraid that you're convinced of a global conspiracy., but the only proof you have of it is that science doesn't talk about god a lot, or what they find contradicts what the bible days. Still doesn't make it anti religious, just makes it contrary to what you believe.

Gah. Give me a break.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10310280

And also, what you're suggesting, is that when a scientist with a religious viewpoint finds evidence of something biblical, those results ARE posted, they're mainly done by creationist scientists, who've either attained their degree via an online school, or actually have a respected doctorate in something, but have been proven wrong so many times, and their evidence picked apart and shown the holes in it, that they are no longer respected by their peers. That happens a lot. Someone attempts to prove something in the bible actually took place, and often will go to extreem measures to make their data match up to what they're saying.

When you use science, in all its majesty, for something like proving a holy book right, you're going to inevitably have to stretch to come out with something. I'm not making this up. It happens a lot. So, it's not like these "scientists" are being shunned, they're being proved wrong, and you can do that research, there has yet to be a paper suggesting a flood or anything of this manner, that hasn't been blown apart by other academics. I don't know how else to say it. You're dead wrong.
Please verify you're human:

Reason for reporting: