Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,571 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 165,023
Pageviews Today: 223,247Threads Today: 65Posts Today: 955
01:52 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject 12,000-year-old unexplained structure
Poster Handle PENG
Post Content
...


Are you talking about the same carbon that they base the Big Bang theory on? (Please don't vilify me on stupidity as I am new to all of this). :)
 Quoting: PENG


Many inaccuracies [link to answers.yahoo.com]
 Quoting: Machine42


I asked because I thought it was interesting that a young savant (Jacob Barnett) was challenging the BBT based on carbon inaccuracies, ad then I read your post. I don't know I'd you saw my link in here about him, but I'm sure a search on him and carbon would give you articles on why he believes this.
 Quoting: PENG


Where ddi you hear that he's challanging the BBT based on carbon dating. I thought it had something to do with the mass and velocity of photons and how tachyons interplay with the universe.

Besides, carbon dating only has a range of about 60,000 years. For older aging they use uranium dating.
 Quoting: chrion777


Mind you, he is young but scientists are interested in his theory.


"Jacob tells his college professors and everyone else who will listen that the theories he is currently working on will expand upon the theories offered by Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawkings and are not designed to disprove them altogether. However, Jacob says that the problem that he has with current theories offered by both is that they do not explain the amount of carbon that we see in the Universe today if the “Big Bang” theory is to be upheld as the manner in which our Universe was created. Jake goes on to say that he doesn’t really care about the fundamental elements of Hydrogen and Helium in the moments that supposedly followed the Big Bang, but that he is more concerned how carbon was formed, which he states could not have been created in the quantities that we see in our Universe today if we follow the Big Bang model from the moment of the Bang until now. And, finally, Jake tells his professors and Dr. Tremaine that he can show that Dr. Einstein’s theories of relativity are flawed, especially in the area of the Cosmological Constant that was introduced to explain inconsistencies in those theories, and that he can prove this with a few mathematical expressions that he is working on."

[link to dancalloway.com]
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP