Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,748 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 202,329
Pageviews Today: 280,698Threads Today: 55Posts Today: 1,284
02:08 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject A digestive system is irrefutable proof that there is no loving god
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
How would you propose to grow cells without nourishment? This is kind of a ridiculous topic, but I'm willing to engage you. Have you studied any biology whatsoever, much less biochemistry? How could a being without cells have continuity of Self?

What are you proposing, beings of pure energy? Is that your litmus test for a proper creation by a benevolent god?

The differentiation of cells is what allows specialization of tissue to occur. That can't happen with nourishment.

Food is consumed by all life, even simple plants that use their roots to absorb nutrients from the soil.

Are you asking for a barren world devoid of the diversity of species? For without the array of creatures to live and die and so form soil or serve as nutrition for other species, there is no food chain.

Even if a being of energy were possible, how would it maintain cohesiveness? How would it grow? What would limit its growth if not bound?

The topic seems very ilogical.
 Quoting: Don'tBeAfraid


Surely a god with unlimited power over the universe can find a way to create a diverse amount of species that didn't involve the food chain? Or are you saying your god is limited?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11421136

Quite the contrary. I'm saying your idea is limited and illogical. You still haven't proposed a lifeform that didn't need nourishment. You didn't study Biology did you?

I'm quite surprised at some of the posts that literally whine about theoretical things, and yet don't pose a solution. In this case, this form of debate is academic as it's impossible to realize, and yet you fail to do the most basic aspects of debating as well as failing to enter into a dialectic with others. You merely complain. It's rather boring, but minorly amusing at 6 am to watch someone rail against what cannot be changed.

Would you like superpowers too? It's like talking to a child.
 Quoting: Don'tBeAfraid


cruise Are you serious?

Now you're just trolling. I didn't create the universe you can't expect me to provide you with solutions, moron. I'm pointing out logical observations about your bullshit idea of a loving god.

Wow, the fail is strong with this one.
putin
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11421136


Sorry OP but when you debate something you need to provide a conlusion and evidence to back up your conclusion. Evan at TAFE level if you make stuff up or don't have evidence you fail...

You need to research your subject, form a hypothesis collect evidence to support your hypothesis. And my personal favourite finding evidence that refutes your hypothesis and figure out a way to make sure your hypothesis can survive debate by structuring your hypothesis in a way that does not reveal or negates the flaw in your hypothesis.

Simply saying, "I don't know." loses the debate.

You should say others fail when you "smurf" up!

Better luck next time.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:



News